Influence of using different toothpaste during bleaching with violet LED light (405 nm) on the colour and roughness of dental enamel: an in vitro study.
{"title":"Influence of using different toothpaste during bleaching with violet LED light (405 nm) on the colour and roughness of dental enamel: an in vitro study.","authors":"Franco Sousa Leticia, Mazzalli Redondo Victor, Ferraz Nobre Laura, Vitti Pino Rafael, Renata Siqueira Scatolin","doi":"10.1007/s10103-024-04161-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This in vitro study aimed to investigate potential changes in the color and roughness of dental enamel resulting from the use of different toothpaste formulations during bleaching with violet LED light (405 nm). Sixty specimens of bovine incisors, each measuring 6 × 6 × 3 mm, were segregated into six distinct experimental groups based on their respective treatments (n = 10): C + VL: Brushing with Colgate<sup>®</sup> Total 12 + bleaching with violet LED; LB + VL: Brushing with Colgate<sup>®</sup> Luminous White Brilliant + bleaching with violet LED; LI + VL: Brushing with Colgate<sup>®</sup> Luminous White Instant + violet LED bleaching; C: Brushing with Colgate<sup>®</sup> Total 12; LB: Brushing with Colgate<sup>®</sup> Luminous White Brilliant; LI: Brushing with Colgate<sup>®</sup> Luminous White Instant. The examined variables included alterations in color (∆L*, ∆a*, ∆b*, ∆Eab, and ∆E00), surface roughness (Ra), and scanning electron microscopy observations. No statistically significant distinctions emerged in total color variations (∆E00 and ∆E) among the groups under scrutiny. Notably, the groups that employed Colgate<sup>®</sup> Luminous White Instant displayed elevated roughness values, irrespective of their association with violet LED, as corroborated by scanning electron microscopy examinations. It can be concluded that whitening toothpastes associated to violet LED do not influence the color change of dental enamel in fifteen days of treatment. Toothpastes with a higher number of abrasive particles showed greater changes in enamel roughness, regardless of the use of violet LED.</p>","PeriodicalId":17978,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Medical Science","volume":"39 1","pages":"217"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-024-04161-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This in vitro study aimed to investigate potential changes in the color and roughness of dental enamel resulting from the use of different toothpaste formulations during bleaching with violet LED light (405 nm). Sixty specimens of bovine incisors, each measuring 6 × 6 × 3 mm, were segregated into six distinct experimental groups based on their respective treatments (n = 10): C + VL: Brushing with Colgate® Total 12 + bleaching with violet LED; LB + VL: Brushing with Colgate® Luminous White Brilliant + bleaching with violet LED; LI + VL: Brushing with Colgate® Luminous White Instant + violet LED bleaching; C: Brushing with Colgate® Total 12; LB: Brushing with Colgate® Luminous White Brilliant; LI: Brushing with Colgate® Luminous White Instant. The examined variables included alterations in color (∆L*, ∆a*, ∆b*, ∆Eab, and ∆E00), surface roughness (Ra), and scanning electron microscopy observations. No statistically significant distinctions emerged in total color variations (∆E00 and ∆E) among the groups under scrutiny. Notably, the groups that employed Colgate® Luminous White Instant displayed elevated roughness values, irrespective of their association with violet LED, as corroborated by scanning electron microscopy examinations. It can be concluded that whitening toothpastes associated to violet LED do not influence the color change of dental enamel in fifteen days of treatment. Toothpastes with a higher number of abrasive particles showed greater changes in enamel roughness, regardless of the use of violet LED.
本体外研究旨在探讨在使用紫光 LED(405 纳米)漂白过程中,使用不同牙膏配方可能导致的牙釉质颜色和粗糙度变化。根据各自的处理方法(n = 10),将 60 个牛门牙标本(每个尺寸为 6 × 6 × 3 毫米)分成 6 个不同的实验组:C + VL:使用高露洁® Total 12刷牙+紫光 LED 漂白;LB + VL:使用高露洁® Luminous White Brilliant刷牙+紫光 LED 漂白;LI + VL:使用高露洁® Luminous White Instant刷牙+紫光 LED 漂白;C:使用高露洁® Total 12刷牙;LB:使用高露洁® Luminous White Brilliant刷牙;LI:使用高露洁® Luminous White Instant刷牙。研究变量包括颜色变化(∆L*、∆a*、∆b*、∆Eab 和 ∆E00)、表面粗糙度(Ra)和扫描电子显微镜观察结果。各组在总颜色变化(∆E00 和 ∆E)方面没有明显的统计学差异。值得注意的是,使用高露洁®夜光净白瞬时美白剂的组别显示出更高的粗糙度值,而与紫光 LED 无关,扫描电子显微镜检查也证实了这一点。由此可以得出结论,与紫光 LED 相关的美白牙膏不会影响牙釉质在十五天治疗后的颜色变化。无论是否使用紫光 LED,含有较多研磨颗粒的牙膏都会使牙釉质的粗糙度发生较大变化。
期刊介绍:
Lasers in Medical Science (LIMS) has established itself as the leading international journal in the rapidly expanding field of medical and dental applications of lasers and light. It provides a forum for the publication of papers on the technical, experimental, and clinical aspects of the use of medical lasers, including lasers in surgery, endoscopy, angioplasty, hyperthermia of tumors, and photodynamic therapy. In addition to medical laser applications, LIMS presents high-quality manuscripts on a wide range of dental topics, including aesthetic dentistry, endodontics, orthodontics, and prosthodontics.
The journal publishes articles on the medical and dental applications of novel laser technologies, light delivery systems, sensors to monitor laser effects, basic laser-tissue interactions, and the modeling of laser-tissue interactions. Beyond laser applications, LIMS features articles relating to the use of non-laser light-tissue interactions.