Investigating the transdiagnostic potential of rumination in relation to Cluster B personality disorder symptoms.

IF 4.2 Personality disorders Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-15 DOI:10.1037/per0000690
Kren Kelley, Julie Anne M Miller, Courtney K Mason, Hilary L DeShong
{"title":"Investigating the transdiagnostic potential of rumination in relation to Cluster B personality disorder symptoms.","authors":"Kren Kelley, Julie Anne M Miller, Courtney K Mason, Hilary L DeShong","doi":"10.1037/per0000690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined several forms of repetitive negative thinking in relation to measures of Cluster B disorders to identify unique and co-occurring cognitive mechanisms contributing to these symptom presentations. MTurk participants (<i>N</i> = 725; 53% men; 76% White) completed categorical and dimensional trait-based measures of Cluster B disorders alongside six measures of rumination and worry. Oversampling strategies were used during participant recruitment to obtain a sample with clinically relevant personality features. Path analyses examined each form of repetitive negative thinking in relation to Cluster B measures while controlling for shared variance between each construct. Anger rumination demonstrated notable relations across all four Cluster B personality disorders. Similarly, sadness rumination was positively associated with all four Cluster B personality disorders. Self-critical rumination and depressive rumination were uniquely associated with borderline symptoms. Worry demonstrated negative associations with measures of narcissistic, histrionic, and antisocial/psychopathy symptoms. Findings expand previous research by highlighting probable transdiagnostic and distinguishing cognitive process contributing to the presentation of Cluster B personality pathology. However, partialling the influence of overlapping constructs presents notable challenges in identifying and interpreting unique relations between various forms of repetitive negative thinking and Cluster B symptoms. Future research investigating these relations within outpatient and inpatient samples may provide avenues for the development of effective cognitive-based interventions for treating these symptoms. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":" ","pages":"469-478"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined several forms of repetitive negative thinking in relation to measures of Cluster B disorders to identify unique and co-occurring cognitive mechanisms contributing to these symptom presentations. MTurk participants (N = 725; 53% men; 76% White) completed categorical and dimensional trait-based measures of Cluster B disorders alongside six measures of rumination and worry. Oversampling strategies were used during participant recruitment to obtain a sample with clinically relevant personality features. Path analyses examined each form of repetitive negative thinking in relation to Cluster B measures while controlling for shared variance between each construct. Anger rumination demonstrated notable relations across all four Cluster B personality disorders. Similarly, sadness rumination was positively associated with all four Cluster B personality disorders. Self-critical rumination and depressive rumination were uniquely associated with borderline symptoms. Worry demonstrated negative associations with measures of narcissistic, histrionic, and antisocial/psychopathy symptoms. Findings expand previous research by highlighting probable transdiagnostic and distinguishing cognitive process contributing to the presentation of Cluster B personality pathology. However, partialling the influence of overlapping constructs presents notable challenges in identifying and interpreting unique relations between various forms of repetitive negative thinking and Cluster B symptoms. Future research investigating these relations within outpatient and inpatient samples may provide avenues for the development of effective cognitive-based interventions for treating these symptoms. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究反刍与 B 群人格障碍症状的跨诊断潜力。
本研究考察了几种形式的重复性消极思维与 B 群障碍测量的关系,以确定导致这些症状表现的独特和共存的认知机制。MTurk 参与者(N = 725;53% 为男性;76% 为白人)在完成六项反刍和担忧测量的同时,还完成了基于分类和维度特质的 B 群障碍测量。在参与者招募过程中采用了过度取样策略,以获得具有临床相关人格特征的样本。路径分析研究了每种形式的重复性消极思维与 B 组测量的关系,同时控制了每种构念之间的共享方差。愤怒反刍在所有四种 B 群人格障碍中都表现出显著的关系。同样,悲伤反刍与所有四种 B 群人格障碍都呈正相关。自我批判性反刍和抑郁性反刍与边缘型症状有独特的关联。忧虑则与自恋型、组织型和反社会/精神病症状呈负相关。研究结果拓展了之前的研究,强调了可能的跨诊断和区分认知过程对B群人格病理表现的影响。然而,在识别和解释各种形式的重复性消极思维与 B 群症状之间的独特关系时,对相互重叠的建构的影响进行部分分析会带来显著的挑战。未来在门诊病人和住院病人样本中调查这些关系的研究可能会为开发有效的基于认知的干预措施来治疗这些症状提供途径。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The network structure of personality functioning and maladaptive traits in adolescents. An evaluation and proposed modifications of personality disorder trait diagnostic sets in the alternative model of personality disorders. Psychoeducational interventions for borderline personality disorder: A scoping review. The most influential decision factors for choosing a formal diagnostic classification system for describing personality pathology. Measurement invariance of the Five-Factor Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory in a U.S. census-matched sample: Demographic differences in obsessive-compulsive personality disorder traits across age, gender, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1