Barriers and Facilitators to Online Grocery Shopping Among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Participants: A Mixed Method Study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Ecology of Food and Nutrition Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-18 DOI:10.1080/03670244.2024.2392557
Elizabeth Anderson Steeves, Rachel Gillespie, Emily DeWitt, Makenzie Barr, Brittany Cox, Travis Hudson, Lindsey Haynes-Maslow, Angela C B Trude, Alison Gustafson
{"title":"Barriers and Facilitators to Online Grocery Shopping Among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Participants: A Mixed Method Study.","authors":"Elizabeth Anderson Steeves, Rachel Gillespie, Emily DeWitt, Makenzie Barr, Brittany Cox, Travis Hudson, Lindsey Haynes-Maslow, Angela C B Trude, Alison Gustafson","doi":"10.1080/03670244.2024.2392557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This mixed methods study explored online grocery shopping perceptions by surveying individuals who do and do not receive SNAP benefits (<i>n</i> = 129) and by conducting interviews with SNAP recipients (<i>n</i> = 26) who have grocery shopped online. T-tests assessed survey findings, codebook thematic analysis was used to identify qualitative themes, and results were interpreted collectively. Survey results found no differences in perceptions of online grocery shopping between SNAP and non-SNAP recipients (p-values = 0.2-1.0) and that 97% of SNAP recipients felt comfortable using SNAP online. Five qualitative themes were identified and provided context to the survey results. The study findings can inform policy actions within SNAP.</p>","PeriodicalId":11511,"journal":{"name":"Ecology of Food and Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"585-604"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology of Food and Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03670244.2024.2392557","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This mixed methods study explored online grocery shopping perceptions by surveying individuals who do and do not receive SNAP benefits (n = 129) and by conducting interviews with SNAP recipients (n = 26) who have grocery shopped online. T-tests assessed survey findings, codebook thematic analysis was used to identify qualitative themes, and results were interpreted collectively. Survey results found no differences in perceptions of online grocery shopping between SNAP and non-SNAP recipients (p-values = 0.2-1.0) and that 97% of SNAP recipients felt comfortable using SNAP online. Five qualitative themes were identified and provided context to the survey results. The study findings can inform policy actions within SNAP.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
补充营养援助计划 (SNAP) 参与者网上购物的障碍和促进因素:混合方法研究。
这项混合方法研究通过调查领取和未领取 SNAP 福利的个人(n = 129),以及对曾在网上购物的 SNAP 领取者(n = 26)进行访谈,探讨了他们对网上购物的看法。通过 T 检验对调查结果进行评估,使用编码本主题分析确定定性主题,并对结果进行综合解释。调查结果显示,SNAP 受助者和非 SNAP 受助者对网上购物的看法没有差异(P 值 = 0.2-1.0),97% 的 SNAP 受助者对在网上使用 SNAP 感到舒适。研究确定了五个定性主题,为调查结果提供了背景信息。研究结果可为 SNAP 的政策行动提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ecology of Food and Nutrition is an international journal of food and nutrition in the broadest sense. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of food and nutrition -- ecological, biological, and cultural. Ecology of Food and Nutrition strives to become a forum for disseminating scholarly information on the holistic and cross-cultural dimensions of the study of food and nutrition. It emphasizes foods and food systems not only in terms of their utilization to satisfy human nutritional needs and health, but also to promote and contest social and cultural identity. The content scope is thus wide -- articles may focus on the relationship between food and nutrition, food taboos and preferences, ecology and political economy of food, the evolution of human nutrition, changes in food habits, food technology and marketing, food and identity, and food sustainability. Additionally, articles focusing on the application of theories and methods to address contemporary food and nutrition problems are encouraged. Questions of the relationship between food/nutrition and culture are as germane to the journal as analyses of the interactions among nutrition and environment, infection and human health.
期刊最新文献
Associations Between Sociodemographic Factors and Adolescent Food Consumption During Independent Eating Occasions. Micronutrient Consumption Among Postpartum Women and Food Insecurity. Association of Chronic Malnutrition, and Not Anemia, with Cognitive Development in Ethiopian Schoolchildren: A Cross-Sectional Study. Evaluation of the Aral Region Adolescent Nutrition with the FFQ_KZ Questionnaire. Biocultural Conservation of Indigenous Foods and Their Potential as Alternative Food Sources in Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHTs), Bangladesh.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1