The conveyor belt for older people nearing the end of life

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Internal Medicine Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-18 DOI:10.1111/imj.16458
Ken Hillman, Adrian G. Barnett, Christine Brown, Leonie Callaway, Magnolia Cardona, Hannah Carter, Alison Farrington, Gillian Harvey, Xing Lee, Steven McPhail, Graves Nicholas, Ben P. White, Nicole M. White, Lindy Willmott
{"title":"The conveyor belt for older people nearing the end of life","authors":"Ken Hillman,&nbsp;Adrian G. Barnett,&nbsp;Christine Brown,&nbsp;Leonie Callaway,&nbsp;Magnolia Cardona,&nbsp;Hannah Carter,&nbsp;Alison Farrington,&nbsp;Gillian Harvey,&nbsp;Xing Lee,&nbsp;Steven McPhail,&nbsp;Graves Nicholas,&nbsp;Ben P. White,&nbsp;Nicole M. White,&nbsp;Lindy Willmott","doi":"10.1111/imj.16458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The current fallback position for the elderly frail nearing the end of life (less than 12 months to live) is hospitalisation. There is a reluctance to use the term ‘terminally ill’ for this population, resulting in overtreatment, overdiagnosis and management that is not consistent with the wishes of people. This is the major contributor to the so-called hospital crisis, including decreased capacity of hospitals, reduced ability to conduct elective surgery, increased attendances at emergency departments and ambulance ramping. The authors recently conducted the largest randomised study, to their knowledge, attempting to inform specialist hospital medical teams about the terminally ill status of their admitted patients. This information did not influence their clinical decisions in any way. The authors discuss the reasons why this may have occurred, such as the current avoidance of discussing death and dying by society and the concentration of healthcare workers on actively managing the acute presenting problem and ignoring the underlying prognosis in the elderly frail. The authors discuss ways of improving the management of the elderly nearing the end of life, such as more detailed goals of care discussions using the concept of shared decision-making rather than simply completing Advanced Care Decision documents. Empowering people in this way could become the most important driver of people's health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":"54 8","pages":"1414-1417"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/imj.16458","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/imj.16458","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current fallback position for the elderly frail nearing the end of life (less than 12 months to live) is hospitalisation. There is a reluctance to use the term ‘terminally ill’ for this population, resulting in overtreatment, overdiagnosis and management that is not consistent with the wishes of people. This is the major contributor to the so-called hospital crisis, including decreased capacity of hospitals, reduced ability to conduct elective surgery, increased attendances at emergency departments and ambulance ramping. The authors recently conducted the largest randomised study, to their knowledge, attempting to inform specialist hospital medical teams about the terminally ill status of their admitted patients. This information did not influence their clinical decisions in any way. The authors discuss the reasons why this may have occurred, such as the current avoidance of discussing death and dying by society and the concentration of healthcare workers on actively managing the acute presenting problem and ignoring the underlying prognosis in the elderly frail. The authors discuss ways of improving the management of the elderly nearing the end of life, such as more detailed goals of care discussions using the concept of shared decision-making rather than simply completing Advanced Care Decision documents. Empowering people in this way could become the most important driver of people's health care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临终老人的传送带。
目前,对于临近生命末期(存活时间少于 12 个月)的体弱老人来说,他们的退路是住院治疗。人们不愿意对这类人群使用 "临终病人 "一词,导致过度治疗、过度诊断和不符合人们意愿的管理。这是造成所谓医院危机的主要原因,包括医院能力下降、进行选择性手术的能力降低、急诊科就诊人数增加以及救护车增加。据作者所知,他们最近进行了一项规模最大的随机研究,试图让专科医院医疗团队了解入院病人的临终状态。这一信息丝毫没有影响他们的临床决策。作者讨论了出现这种情况的原因,例如目前社会对死亡和临终的回避,以及医护人员集中精力积极处理急性病突发问题,而忽视了年老体弱者的潜在预后。作者讨论了改善临终老人管理的方法,例如利用共同决策的概念进行更详细的护理目标讨论,而不是简单地填写高级护理决策文件。以这种方式增强人们的能力可能会成为人们医疗保健的最重要驱动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Internal Medicine Journal
Internal Medicine Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
600
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Internal Medicine Journal is the official journal of the Adult Medicine Division of The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP). Its purpose is to publish high-quality internationally competitive peer-reviewed original medical research, both laboratory and clinical, relating to the study and research of human disease. Papers will be considered from all areas of medical practice and science. The Journal also has a major role in continuing medical education and publishes review articles relevant to physician education.
期刊最新文献
Final results of the National Oncology Mentorship Program 2023 and its impact on burnout and professional fulfilment. Platelet factor 4 immune disease: medical emergencies that look like heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Correction to: 'Managing cancer-related pain in the setting of proven IgE-mediated opioid anaphylaxis'. Real-world impact of pembrolizumab availability for deficient mismatch repair metastatic colorectal cancer. Environmental impact of large language models in medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1