[ARGEN-IAM-ST Registry: older adults with infarction: Are they all the same?]

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Medicina-buenos Aires Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Yanina Castillo Costa, Flavio Delfino, Soledad Palacio, Adrián Charask, Víctor Mauro, Stella Macín, Gerardo Zapata, Heraldo D Imperio, Jorge Thierer, Juan Gagliardi
{"title":"[ARGEN-IAM-ST Registry: older adults with infarction: Are they all the same?]","authors":"Yanina Castillo Costa, Flavio Delfino, Soledad Palacio, Adrián Charask, Víctor Mauro, Stella Macín, Gerardo Zapata, Heraldo D Imperio, Jorge Thierer, Juan Gagliardi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Currently the patient is defined as an older adult (OA) when the age is at least 60 years. Given the long life expectancy, it is interesting to evaluate whether all OAs with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are equal. The objectives were to know the prevalence of OA in AMI and within them, that of those ≥75 years of age and to analyze characteristics, reperfusion treatments and in-hospital mortality according to whether they are < or ≥ 75 years of age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>OA patients admitted to the National Registry of Infarction with ST segment elevation (ARGENIAM-ST) were analyzed. They were divided into group 1: 60-74 years old and group 2: ≥ 75 years old and compared with each other.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>3626 AM, 75.9% from Group 1, the rest from Group 2. In group 2 there were more women, hypertensive and with a history of coronary arteries. There was a similar percentage of diabetes and dyslipidemia, but fewer of smokers. In Group 2, less reperfusion treatment was used (although more primary angioplasty), with similar door-to-balloon time. Patients in Group 2 received fewer medications of proven efficacy and in the hospital course, they had more bleeding (although not major), more heart failure and more mortality: 18.3% vs. 9.4%, p<0.001. Age ≥75 years was an independent predictor of mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>one in four patients with AMI is over 75 years old; they receive less reperfusion, have more heart failure, bleeding and twice the mortality rate than patients between 60 and 74 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":18419,"journal":{"name":"Medicina-buenos Aires","volume":"84 4","pages":"682-688"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina-buenos Aires","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Currently the patient is defined as an older adult (OA) when the age is at least 60 years. Given the long life expectancy, it is interesting to evaluate whether all OAs with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are equal. The objectives were to know the prevalence of OA in AMI and within them, that of those ≥75 years of age and to analyze characteristics, reperfusion treatments and in-hospital mortality according to whether they are < or ≥ 75 years of age.

Methods: OA patients admitted to the National Registry of Infarction with ST segment elevation (ARGENIAM-ST) were analyzed. They were divided into group 1: 60-74 years old and group 2: ≥ 75 years old and compared with each other.

Results: 3626 AM, 75.9% from Group 1, the rest from Group 2. In group 2 there were more women, hypertensive and with a history of coronary arteries. There was a similar percentage of diabetes and dyslipidemia, but fewer of smokers. In Group 2, less reperfusion treatment was used (although more primary angioplasty), with similar door-to-balloon time. Patients in Group 2 received fewer medications of proven efficacy and in the hospital course, they had more bleeding (although not major), more heart failure and more mortality: 18.3% vs. 9.4%, p<0.001. Age ≥75 years was an independent predictor of mortality.

Conclusions: one in four patients with AMI is over 75 years old; they receive less reperfusion, have more heart failure, bleeding and twice the mortality rate than patients between 60 and 74 years.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[ARGEN-IAM-ST登记:患有脑梗塞的老年人:他们都一样吗?]
导言:目前,年龄至少在 60 岁以上的患者被定义为老年人(OA)。鉴于预期寿命较长,评估急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者中是否所有 OA 都是一样的很有意义。我们的目标是了解急性心肌梗死中OA的发病率,以及其中年龄≥75岁的OA的发病率,并根据年龄小于或≥75岁分析OA的特征、再灌注治疗和院内死亡率:方法:对国家心梗登记处(ARGENIAM-ST)收治的ST段抬高的OA患者进行分析。将他们分为第一组:60-74 岁和第二组:≥ 75 岁,并进行比较:第 2 组中女性、高血压和冠状动脉病史者较多。糖尿病和血脂异常的比例相似,但吸烟者较少。第 2 组使用的再灌注治疗较少(尽管初级血管成形术较多),但从门到气球的时间相似。结论:每四名急性心肌梗死患者中就有一名是75岁以上的老人;他们接受的再灌注治疗较少,心力衰竭和出血较多,死亡率是60至74岁患者的两倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medicina-buenos Aires
Medicina-buenos Aires 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
[Clinical approach to the patient with obesity document by the Argentine Society of Medicine, the Uruguayan Society of Internal Medicine, and the International Forum of Internal Medicine]. JOINT MEETING SAIC SAFIS ALACF 2024. Joint Meeting SAIC SAFIS ALACF 2024. [Angelman syndrome: current approach and the future of therapies]. [Autism: associated medical conditions].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1