Prognostic value of the 5-SENSE Score to predict focality of the seizure-onset zone as assessed by stereoelectroencephalography: a prospective international multicentre validation study.

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY BMJ Neurology Open Pub Date : 2024-08-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjno-2024-000765
Alexandra Astner-Rohracher, Alyssa Ho, John Archer, Fabrice Bartolomei, Milan Brazdil, Melita Cacic Hribljan, James Castellano, Irena Dolezalova, Martin Ejler Fabricius, Mercedes Garcés-Sanchez, Kahina Hammam, Akio Ikeda, Kristin Ikeda, Philippe Kahane, Giridhar Kalamangalam, Gudrun Kalss, Mays Khweileh, Katsuya Kobayashi, Patrick Kwan, Joshua Andrew Laing, Markus Leitinger, Samden Lhatoo, Julia Makhalova, Aileen McGonigal, Iona Mindruta, Mary Margaret Mizera, Andrew Neal, Irina Oane, Prachi Parikh, Piero Perucca, Francesca Pizzo, Rodrigo Rocamora, Philippe Ryvlin, Victoria San Antonio Arce, Stephan Schuele, Andreas Schulze-Bonhage, Ana Suller Marti, Alexandra Urban, Vincente Villanueva, Laura Vilella Bertran, Benjamin Whatley, Sandor Beniczky, Eugen Trinka, Georg Zimmermann, Birgit Frauscher
{"title":"Prognostic value of the 5-SENSE Score to predict focality of the seizure-onset zone as assessed by stereoelectroencephalography: a prospective international multicentre validation study.","authors":"Alexandra Astner-Rohracher, Alyssa Ho, John Archer, Fabrice Bartolomei, Milan Brazdil, Melita Cacic Hribljan, James Castellano, Irena Dolezalova, Martin Ejler Fabricius, Mercedes Garcés-Sanchez, Kahina Hammam, Akio Ikeda, Kristin Ikeda, Philippe Kahane, Giridhar Kalamangalam, Gudrun Kalss, Mays Khweileh, Katsuya Kobayashi, Patrick Kwan, Joshua Andrew Laing, Markus Leitinger, Samden Lhatoo, Julia Makhalova, Aileen McGonigal, Iona Mindruta, Mary Margaret Mizera, Andrew Neal, Irina Oane, Prachi Parikh, Piero Perucca, Francesca Pizzo, Rodrigo Rocamora, Philippe Ryvlin, Victoria San Antonio Arce, Stephan Schuele, Andreas Schulze-Bonhage, Ana Suller Marti, Alexandra Urban, Vincente Villanueva, Laura Vilella Bertran, Benjamin Whatley, Sandor Beniczky, Eugen Trinka, Georg Zimmermann, Birgit Frauscher","doi":"10.1136/bmjno-2024-000765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Epilepsy surgery is the only curative treatment for patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is the gold standard to delineate the seizure-onset zone (SOZ). However, up to 40% of patients are subsequently not operated as no focal non-eloquent SOZ can be identified. The 5-SENSE Score is a 5-point score to predict whether a focal SOZ is likely to be identified by SEEG. This study aims to validate the 5-SENSE Score, improve score performance by incorporating auxiliary diagnostic methods and evaluate its concordance with expert decisions.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>Non-interventional, observational, multicentre, prospective study including 200 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy aged ≥15 years undergoing SEEG for identification of a focal SOZ and 200 controls at 22 epilepsy surgery centres worldwide. The primary objective is to assess the diagnostic accuracy and generalisability of the 5-SENSE in predicting focality in SEEG in a prospective cohort. Secondary objectives are to optimise score performance by incorporating auxiliary diagnostic methods and to analyse concordance of the 5-SENSE Score with the expert decisions made in the multidisciplinary team discussion.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>Prospective multicentre validation of the 5-SENSE score may lead to its implementation into clinical practice to assist clinicians in the difficult decision of whether to proceed with implantation. This study will be conducted in accordance with the Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans (2014). We plan to publish the study results in a peer-reviewed full-length original article and present its findings at scientific conferences.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT06138808.</p>","PeriodicalId":52754,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Neurology Open","volume":"6 2","pages":"e000765"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11340713/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Neurology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2024-000765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Epilepsy surgery is the only curative treatment for patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is the gold standard to delineate the seizure-onset zone (SOZ). However, up to 40% of patients are subsequently not operated as no focal non-eloquent SOZ can be identified. The 5-SENSE Score is a 5-point score to predict whether a focal SOZ is likely to be identified by SEEG. This study aims to validate the 5-SENSE Score, improve score performance by incorporating auxiliary diagnostic methods and evaluate its concordance with expert decisions.

Methods and analysis: Non-interventional, observational, multicentre, prospective study including 200 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy aged ≥15 years undergoing SEEG for identification of a focal SOZ and 200 controls at 22 epilepsy surgery centres worldwide. The primary objective is to assess the diagnostic accuracy and generalisability of the 5-SENSE in predicting focality in SEEG in a prospective cohort. Secondary objectives are to optimise score performance by incorporating auxiliary diagnostic methods and to analyse concordance of the 5-SENSE Score with the expert decisions made in the multidisciplinary team discussion.

Ethics and dissemination: Prospective multicentre validation of the 5-SENSE score may lead to its implementation into clinical practice to assist clinicians in the difficult decision of whether to proceed with implantation. This study will be conducted in accordance with the Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans (2014). We plan to publish the study results in a peer-reviewed full-length original article and present its findings at scientific conferences.

Trial registration number: NCT06138808.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
立体脑电图评估的 5-SENSE 评分预测癫痫发作起始区病灶的预后价值:一项前瞻性国际多中心验证研究。
简介:癫痫手术是治疗耐药性局灶性癫痫患者的唯一方法。立体脑电图(SEEG)是划分癫痫发作起始区(SOZ)的黄金标准。然而,多达40%的患者因无法确定非骤发的局灶性SOZ而未能接受手术。5-SENSE 评分是一种预测 SEEG 是否有可能识别出局灶性 SOZ 的 5 级评分。本研究旨在验证 5-SENSE 评分,通过纳入辅助诊断方法提高评分性能,并评估其与专家决定的一致性:非干预性、观察性、多中心、前瞻性研究,包括全球 22 家癫痫外科中心的 200 名年龄≥15 岁的耐药性癫痫患者和 200 名对照组患者,前者接受 SEEG 检查以确定病灶 SOZ。主要目的是评估 5-SENSE 在前瞻性队列中预测 SEEG 病灶的诊断准确性和通用性。次要目标是通过纳入辅助诊断方法优化评分性能,并分析5-SENSE评分与多学科团队讨论中专家决定的一致性:对5-SENSE评分进行前瞻性多中心验证,可将其应用于临床实践,帮助临床医生做出是否继续植入的艰难决定。本研究将根据三理事会政策声明进行:涉及人类研究的伦理行为》(2014 年)。我们计划将研究结果发表在经同行评审的长篇原创文章中,并在科学会议上介绍研究结果:NCT06138808.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Neurology Open
BMJ Neurology Open Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
46
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Undiagnosed major risk factors in acute ischaemic stroke patients in Qatar: analysis from the Qatar stroke registry. Late-onset myopathy responsive to immunomodulatory treatment: sporadic late-onset nemaline myopathy without nemaline rods? Catatonia in anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: a case series and approach to improve outcomes with electroconvulsive therapy. Analysis of door-to-needle time for thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke using statistical process control charts. Statins are rarely prescribed for incidentally discovered covert cerebrovascular disease: a retrospective cohort in a large electronic health record (EHR) identified using natural language processing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1