From outcomes to practices: Measuring the commitment to sustainability of organisations

IF 4.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Science & Policy Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103868
{"title":"From outcomes to practices: Measuring the commitment to sustainability of organisations","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) outlined in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, organisations must transform their cultures and demonstrate high levels of commitment by developing sustainability-focused practices. However, existing measurement frameworks have often overlooked the concept of commitment or have used non-standardized approaches based on individual perceptions. Additionally, measurement approaches have tended to focus more on the final outcomes of sustainability initiatives rather than on the practices themselves, sometimes leading to behaviours that have undesired societal impacts, especially when short-term outcomes are emphasised.</p><p>This study conceptualises commitment to sustainability as the relationship between a company's resources and its implemented practices. The paper introduces a Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)-based index designed to assess a company's environmental and social sustainability commitment. The approach was tested on a sample of 1411 Italian companies across six different industries.</p><p>The findings demonstrate that this innovative index effectively captures the theoretical concept of commitment to sustainability. Furthermore, assessing social and environmental commitment separately provides a clearer picture than using a single indicator encompassing both dimensions, thereby offering a nuanced understanding that aligns with the comprehensive targets set by the 2030 Agenda.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124002028/pdfft?md5=87bdff9fecb45b65ed751cd2beaa3005&pid=1-s2.0-S1462901124002028-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124002028","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) outlined in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, organisations must transform their cultures and demonstrate high levels of commitment by developing sustainability-focused practices. However, existing measurement frameworks have often overlooked the concept of commitment or have used non-standardized approaches based on individual perceptions. Additionally, measurement approaches have tended to focus more on the final outcomes of sustainability initiatives rather than on the practices themselves, sometimes leading to behaviours that have undesired societal impacts, especially when short-term outcomes are emphasised.

This study conceptualises commitment to sustainability as the relationship between a company's resources and its implemented practices. The paper introduces a Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)-based index designed to assess a company's environmental and social sustainability commitment. The approach was tested on a sample of 1411 Italian companies across six different industries.

The findings demonstrate that this innovative index effectively captures the theoretical concept of commitment to sustainability. Furthermore, assessing social and environmental commitment separately provides a clearer picture than using a single indicator encompassing both dimensions, thereby offering a nuanced understanding that aligns with the comprehensive targets set by the 2030 Agenda.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从结果到实践:衡量组织对可持续发展的承诺
为实现《2030 年可持续发展议程》中概述的可持续发展目标(SDGs),各组织必须转变其文化,并通过发展以可持续发展为重点的实践来展现高度的承诺。然而,现有的衡量框架往往忽视了承诺的概念,或采用基于个人感知的非标准化方法。此外,衡量方法往往更注重可持续发展举措的最终结果,而不是实践本身,有时会导致产生不良社会影响的行为,尤其是在强调短期结果的情况下。本研究将可持续发展承诺概念化为公司资源与其实施的实践之间的关系。本文介绍了一种基于数据包络分析(DEA)的指数,旨在评估公司的环境和社会可持续发展承诺。研究结果表明,这一创新指数有效捕捉了可持续发展承诺的理论概念。此外,与使用包含两个维度的单一指标相比,分别评估社会和环境承诺能提供更清晰的图景,从而提供与 2030 年议程设定的综合目标相一致的细致入微的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Attending to the unattended: Why and how do local governments plan for access and functional needs in climate risk reduction? Beyond Academia: A case for reviews of gray literature for science-policy processes and applied research Of heroes and villains – How coalitions shape their narratives and what the public conservation debate is actually about? Enhancing meaningful Indigenous leadership and collaboration in international environmental governance forums
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1