Digital otoscopy in remote consultations

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology Pub Date : 2024-08-24 DOI:10.1002/lio2.70003
Erik Appelberg MD, Sanna Viitasalo MD, PhD, Lena Hafrén MD, PhD, Juha Laakso MD, Samuli Suutarla MD, PhD, Erkki Hopsu MD, PhD, Saku T. Sinkkonen MD, PhD
{"title":"Digital otoscopy in remote consultations","authors":"Erik Appelberg MD,&nbsp;Sanna Viitasalo MD, PhD,&nbsp;Lena Hafrén MD, PhD,&nbsp;Juha Laakso MD,&nbsp;Samuli Suutarla MD, PhD,&nbsp;Erkki Hopsu MD, PhD,&nbsp;Saku T. Sinkkonen MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/lio2.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Otoscopes and otomicroscopes are the most commonly used instruments for visualizing the ear. Digital otoscopy (DO) could be used to improve diagnostics in primary health care by utilizing image enlargement. The aim of the study was to explore the possibilities of DO in remote consultations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Based on real-life referrals, 45 otologic outpatients were recruited. DO was performed followed by an attending otologist's appointment, serving as the gold standard. Twenty-four patient cases were analyzed on a digital platform as remote consultation cases containing the given referral information supplemented with DO videos (DOVs). A total of 71 evaluations were performed by five otologists. The quality of the DOVs, their suitability for remote consultations, the accuracy of diagnoses and the usefulness of remote consultations were determined.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The average DOV quality was judged to be 7.4 ± 0.3 (mean ± standard error of the mean; scale of 1–10). The diagnosis was correct in 79% of the cases. In 59% of the patients, the otologists considered that remote consultation could have replaced an in-person visit.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In our simulated remote consultation setup, DOV quality was sufficient for diagnostic purposes, DO improved diagnostics and treatment planning in most cases and could be used to reduce the need for in-person visits. DO-aided remote consultation may improve diagnostics and access to care.</p>\n \n <p>Level of evidence: 3.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48529,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lio2.70003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.70003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Otoscopes and otomicroscopes are the most commonly used instruments for visualizing the ear. Digital otoscopy (DO) could be used to improve diagnostics in primary health care by utilizing image enlargement. The aim of the study was to explore the possibilities of DO in remote consultations.

Materials and Methods

Based on real-life referrals, 45 otologic outpatients were recruited. DO was performed followed by an attending otologist's appointment, serving as the gold standard. Twenty-four patient cases were analyzed on a digital platform as remote consultation cases containing the given referral information supplemented with DO videos (DOVs). A total of 71 evaluations were performed by five otologists. The quality of the DOVs, their suitability for remote consultations, the accuracy of diagnoses and the usefulness of remote consultations were determined.

Results

The average DOV quality was judged to be 7.4 ± 0.3 (mean ± standard error of the mean; scale of 1–10). The diagnosis was correct in 79% of the cases. In 59% of the patients, the otologists considered that remote consultation could have replaced an in-person visit.

Conclusions

In our simulated remote consultation setup, DOV quality was sufficient for diagnostic purposes, DO improved diagnostics and treatment planning in most cases and could be used to reduce the need for in-person visits. DO-aided remote consultation may improve diagnostics and access to care.

Level of evidence: 3.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
远程会诊中的数字耳镜检查
导言 耳镜和耳显微镜是观察耳朵最常用的仪器。数字耳镜(DO)可通过放大图像来改善初级卫生保健的诊断。本研究旨在探索数字耳镜在远程会诊中的应用可能性。 材料和方法 根据实际转诊情况,招募了 45 名耳科门诊患者。作为金标准,耳科主治医师会诊后进行 DO。在数字平台上分析了 24 例患者的远程会诊病例,这些病例包含给定的转诊信息,并辅以 DO 视频(DOV)。五位耳科医生共进行了 71 次评估。对 DOV 的质量、远程会诊的适用性、诊断的准确性和远程会诊的实用性进行了判定。 结果 DOV 的平均质量为 7.4 ± 0.3(平均值 ± 平均值标准误差;1-10 分)。79%的病例诊断正确。在 59% 的患者中,耳科专家认为远程会诊本可以取代亲诊。 结论 在我们的模拟远程会诊设置中,DOV 质量足以满足诊断目的,DO 在大多数病例中可改善诊断和治疗计划,并可用于减少亲诊的需要。DO辅助远程会诊可改善诊断和医疗服务。 证据等级:3.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Challenges and outcomes of airway surgery in a post-war low-resource setting: A case series from Mekelle, Ethiopia. Challenges and outcomes of airway surgery in a post-war low-resource setting: A case series from Mekelle, Ethiopia Automated classification of online reviews of otolaryngologists Individualized post-operative prediction of cochlear implantation outcomes in children with prelingual deafness using functional near-infrared spectroscopy Causes and treatment of secondary sphenoid sinus infection post-endoscopic transsphenoidal approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1