The association between attitude towards facemasks, quality of donation experience and relationship with healthcare providers: A cross-sectional exploratory study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY Vox Sanguinis Pub Date : 2024-08-25 DOI:10.1111/vox.13728
Marco Bani, Stefano Ardenghi, Selena Russo, Federico Zorzi, Giulia Rampoldi, Alexia Del Greco, Alessandra Caputo, Barbara Giussani, Erica Magri, Maria Grazia Strepparava
{"title":"The association between attitude towards facemasks, quality of donation experience and relationship with healthcare providers: A cross-sectional exploratory study.","authors":"Marco Bani, Stefano Ardenghi, Selena Russo, Federico Zorzi, Giulia Rampoldi, Alexia Del Greco, Alessandra Caputo, Barbara Giussani, Erica Magri, Maria Grazia Strepparava","doi":"10.1111/vox.13728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Facemasks represent an essential measure of prevention against the spread of infectious diseases; however, they lessen the ability to convey and understand emotions through facial expressions. In blood donation settings, facemask wearing could interfere with professionals' tasks, reduce the satisfaction of blood donors and affect their future blood donation behaviour. This preliminary cross-sectional study explored the association of mandatory facemask wearing with the quality of the blood donation process at the end of the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A sample of 615 voluntary unpaid Italian blood and plasma donors completed an online survey assessing their attitude towards facemask wearing, the perceived distress due to facemasks in the different steps of the donation process, self-reported vasovagal reactions after donation and the intention to donate again.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nearly 24% of donors reported a worsened quality of the donation process due to facemask wearing, and 36% reported moderate to severe distress during the donation itself. Donors with a more negative attitude towards facemasks reported a worse donation experience, mainly related to the interactions and the communication with physicians and nurses, and a higher probability of experiencing vasovagal reactions at their last donation. No significant correlations were observed between negative facemask attitudes towards facemask wearing, distress or future intention to donate blood/plasma.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Facemasks have worsened the quality of blood and plasma donations for one fourth of donors, confirming the interference with the quality of communications and relationships with healthcare professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":23631,"journal":{"name":"Vox Sanguinis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vox Sanguinis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vox.13728","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Facemasks represent an essential measure of prevention against the spread of infectious diseases; however, they lessen the ability to convey and understand emotions through facial expressions. In blood donation settings, facemask wearing could interfere with professionals' tasks, reduce the satisfaction of blood donors and affect their future blood donation behaviour. This preliminary cross-sectional study explored the association of mandatory facemask wearing with the quality of the blood donation process at the end of the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

Materials and methods: A sample of 615 voluntary unpaid Italian blood and plasma donors completed an online survey assessing their attitude towards facemask wearing, the perceived distress due to facemasks in the different steps of the donation process, self-reported vasovagal reactions after donation and the intention to donate again.

Results: Nearly 24% of donors reported a worsened quality of the donation process due to facemask wearing, and 36% reported moderate to severe distress during the donation itself. Donors with a more negative attitude towards facemasks reported a worse donation experience, mainly related to the interactions and the communication with physicians and nurses, and a higher probability of experiencing vasovagal reactions at their last donation. No significant correlations were observed between negative facemask attitudes towards facemask wearing, distress or future intention to donate blood/plasma.

Conclusion: Facemasks have worsened the quality of blood and plasma donations for one fourth of donors, confirming the interference with the quality of communications and relationships with healthcare professionals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对面罩的态度、捐赠体验的质量以及与医疗服务提供者关系之间的关联:一项横断面探索性研究。
背景和目的:面罩是预防传染病传播的一项基本措施;然而,面罩会降低通过面部表情传达和理解情绪的能力。在献血环境中,佩戴口罩可能会干扰专业人员的工作,降低献血者的满意度,并影响他们未来的献血行为。这项初步横断面研究探讨了在 2019 年冠状病毒(COVID-19)大流行结束时,强制佩戴面罩与献血过程质量的关系:615名意大利无偿自愿献血者和血浆捐献者完成了一项在线调查,评估了他们对佩戴面罩的态度、在捐献过程的不同步骤中因面罩造成的痛苦感知、捐献后自我报告的血管迷走神经反应以及再次捐献的意愿:结果:近 24% 的捐献者表示,由于佩戴面罩,捐献过程的质量有所下降,36% 的捐献者表示在捐献过程中感到中度到严重的痛苦。对面罩持负面态度的捐献者表示捐献体验较差,主要与与医生和护士的互动和沟通有关,并且在最后一次捐献时出现血管迷走反应的概率较高。在对佩戴面罩的负面态度、痛苦或未来献血/捐献血浆的意愿之间没有观察到明显的相关性:结论:对四分之一的献血者来说,面罩降低了献血和血浆的质量,证实了面罩干扰了与医护人员的沟通质量和关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vox Sanguinis
Vox Sanguinis 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
156
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Vox Sanguinis reports on important, novel developments in transfusion medicine. Original papers, reviews and international fora are published on all aspects of blood transfusion and tissue transplantation, comprising five main sections: 1) Transfusion - Transmitted Disease and its Prevention: Identification and epidemiology of infectious agents transmissible by blood; Bacterial contamination of blood components; Donor recruitment and selection methods; Pathogen inactivation. 2) Blood Component Collection and Production: Blood collection methods and devices (including apheresis); Plasma fractionation techniques and plasma derivatives; Preparation of labile blood components; Inventory management; Hematopoietic progenitor cell collection and storage; Collection and storage of tissues; Quality management and good manufacturing practice; Automation and information technology. 3) Transfusion Medicine and New Therapies: Transfusion thresholds and audits; Haemovigilance; Clinical trials regarding appropriate haemotherapy; Non-infectious adverse affects of transfusion; Therapeutic apheresis; Support of transplant patients; Gene therapy and immunotherapy. 4) Immunohaematology and Immunogenetics: Autoimmunity in haematology; Alloimmunity of blood; Pre-transfusion testing; Immunodiagnostics; Immunobiology; Complement in immunohaematology; Blood typing reagents; Genetic markers of blood cells and serum proteins: polymorphisms and function; Genetic markers and disease; Parentage testing and forensic immunohaematology. 5) Cellular Therapy: Cell-based therapies; Stem cell sources; Stem cell processing and storage; Stem cell products; Stem cell plasticity; Regenerative medicine with cells; Cellular immunotherapy; Molecular therapy; Gene therapy.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the progress of a decade-long haemovigilance programme in India. Non-neutralizing antibody profiles against hepatitis B virus: A comparative study of Japanese- and US-donor-derived intramuscular human hepatitis B-specific immunoglobulin preparations. Frequency of human platelet antigens (HPA) in the Greek population as deduced from the first registry of HPA-typed blood donors. Autoantibodies to ADAMTS13 in human immunodeficiency virus‐associated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura Extending the post‐thaw shelf‐life of cryoprecipitate when stored at refrigerated temperatures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1