Satisfaction Level of Patients with the Outcome of Genioplasty.

IF 0.9 Q3 SURGERY World Journal of Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.61186/wjps.13.2.58
Farnoosh Razmara, Newsha Sadat Ghorani, Nima Dehghani, Xaniar Mahmoudi
{"title":"Satisfaction Level of Patients with the Outcome of Genioplasty.","authors":"Farnoosh Razmara, Newsha Sadat Ghorani, Nima Dehghani, Xaniar Mahmoudi","doi":"10.61186/wjps.13.2.58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aimed to assess the satisfaction level of patients with the outcome of genioplasty and the influential parameters in this respect.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study was conducted on 70 patients between 18 to 59 years, who underwent genioplasty in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department at Shariati and Sina Hospitals, Tehran, Iran, between 2010 and 2020. Patient records were evaluated and a questionnaire was filled out over the phone to assess the influential parameters on the satisfaction level of patients with the outcome of genioplasty. Data were analyzed by PASS 11 (alpha=0.1).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy patients were evaluated including 56 (80%) females and 14 (20%) males. Forty patients (52.6%) had no complaint with regard to the outcome of genioplasty. Postoperative chin deviation (not correcting the initial complaint) (10.52%), postoperative pain in the chin area (10.52%), and lower lip paresthesia (9.21%) were the most common patient complaints. The minimum and maximum satisfaction scores were 22 and 80, respectively. Number of follow-up sessions had a significant effect on satisfaction with the outcome of genioplasty (P=0.076). Patients who underwent advancement genioplasty alone had the highest level of long-term satisfaction with the outcome while those who underwent setback genioplasty alone had the lowest level of long-term satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Advancement genioplasty had the highest rate of patient satisfaction, and chin asymmetry in the frontal view was the most common patient complaint after genioplasty.</p>","PeriodicalId":23736,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346685/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61186/wjps.13.2.58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We aimed to assess the satisfaction level of patients with the outcome of genioplasty and the influential parameters in this respect.

Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on 70 patients between 18 to 59 years, who underwent genioplasty in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department at Shariati and Sina Hospitals, Tehran, Iran, between 2010 and 2020. Patient records were evaluated and a questionnaire was filled out over the phone to assess the influential parameters on the satisfaction level of patients with the outcome of genioplasty. Data were analyzed by PASS 11 (alpha=0.1).

Results: Seventy patients were evaluated including 56 (80%) females and 14 (20%) males. Forty patients (52.6%) had no complaint with regard to the outcome of genioplasty. Postoperative chin deviation (not correcting the initial complaint) (10.52%), postoperative pain in the chin area (10.52%), and lower lip paresthesia (9.21%) were the most common patient complaints. The minimum and maximum satisfaction scores were 22 and 80, respectively. Number of follow-up sessions had a significant effect on satisfaction with the outcome of genioplasty (P=0.076). Patients who underwent advancement genioplasty alone had the highest level of long-term satisfaction with the outcome while those who underwent setback genioplasty alone had the lowest level of long-term satisfaction.

Conclusion: Advancement genioplasty had the highest rate of patient satisfaction, and chin asymmetry in the frontal view was the most common patient complaint after genioplasty.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者对根管成形术结果的满意度。
背景:我们的目的是评估患者对生殖器成形术效果的满意度以及在这方面的影响因素:我们的目的是评估患者对基因成形术结果的满意度以及对其有影响的参数:这项回顾性研究针对 2010 年至 2020 年期间在伊朗德黑兰 Shariati 和 Sina 医院口腔颌面外科接受牙根成形术的 70 名 18 至 59 岁患者。对患者的病历进行了评估,并通过电话填写了一份调查问卷,以评估影响患者对基因成形术结果满意度的参数。数据采用 PASS 11(alpha=0.1)进行分析:对 70 名患者进行了评估,其中女性 56 人(80%),男性 14 人(20%)。40名患者(52.6%)对基底成形术的效果没有任何抱怨。术后下巴偏斜(未纠正最初的主诉)(10.52%)、术后下巴部位疼痛(10.52%)和下唇麻痹(9.21%)是患者最常见的主诉。最低和最高满意度分别为 22 分和 80 分。随访次数对基底成形术结果满意度有显著影响(P=0.076)。单独接受前移式牙根成形术的患者对手术效果的长期满意度最高,而单独接受后退式牙根成形术的患者对手术效果的长期满意度最低:结论:颏前移成形术的患者满意度最高,颏部正面不对称是颏前移成形术后患者最常见的主诉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
11.10%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
A Giant Nevus Sebaceous Lesion in an 18 Year-Old Male: A Case Report. Assessing the Utility of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Posters as Educational Aids in Dental Education for Undergraduate Students: Is it Useless or Helpful? Comparison of the Effect of Two Low to High Lateral Osteotomy Methods, Percutaneous and Internal On the Tear Trough and Scleral Show in Patients Undergoing Esthetic Open Rhinoplasty. Comparison the Effect of Conventional and Nanofat Injection Methods on Nasolabial Fold Lipofilling: A Case- Control Study. Satisfaction and Quality of Life in Patients Who Underwent Post Massive Weight Loss Body Contouring Procedures: A Tertiary Center Experience in Bahrain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1