Reviewing 20 years of redevelopment trajectories of industrial sites literature and highlighting new research perspectives

IF 6 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Land Use Policy Pub Date : 2024-08-29 DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107326
Belinda Ravaz , Pierre-Henri Bombenger , Massimiliano Capezzali , Teva Meyer
{"title":"Reviewing 20 years of redevelopment trajectories of industrial sites literature and highlighting new research perspectives","authors":"Belinda Ravaz ,&nbsp;Pierre-Henri Bombenger ,&nbsp;Massimiliano Capezzali ,&nbsp;Teva Meyer","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although there has been a large amount of study into the future of post-industrial site, there have been few efforts to synthesize and connect this research. This paper presents a systematic review of the international literature on the redevelopment trajectories of post-industrial land. Its aim is to consolidate existing knowledge, identify gaps and provide a solid basis for future research. We will answer the following questions: (i) what are the trends in research into the redevelopment of post-industrial sites? (ii) what factors influence their redevelopment trajectories? and (iii) how do these factors interact? To understand this, we conducted a systematic literature review, based on 71 carefully selected articles published between 2002 and 2021. Using a methodology combining statistics and content analysis, we noted an increase in research on this subject in the mid-2010s. We also observed that monocase studies were the most common, and that the most studied fields were on the Asian continent. Furthermore, we identified three main approaches: the industrial heritage approach; the brownfield approach; and the governance approach. We conclude by identifying gaps in current research trends and new research perspectives.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17933,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Policy","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 107326"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837724002795/pdfft?md5=385a070e7e2bd1e93c2c0c1516188310&pid=1-s2.0-S0264837724002795-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Use Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837724002795","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although there has been a large amount of study into the future of post-industrial site, there have been few efforts to synthesize and connect this research. This paper presents a systematic review of the international literature on the redevelopment trajectories of post-industrial land. Its aim is to consolidate existing knowledge, identify gaps and provide a solid basis for future research. We will answer the following questions: (i) what are the trends in research into the redevelopment of post-industrial sites? (ii) what factors influence their redevelopment trajectories? and (iii) how do these factors interact? To understand this, we conducted a systematic literature review, based on 71 carefully selected articles published between 2002 and 2021. Using a methodology combining statistics and content analysis, we noted an increase in research on this subject in the mid-2010s. We also observed that monocase studies were the most common, and that the most studied fields were on the Asian continent. Furthermore, we identified three main approaches: the industrial heritage approach; the brownfield approach; and the governance approach. We conclude by identifying gaps in current research trends and new research perspectives.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
回顾 20 年来的工业用地重建轨迹文献,强调新的研究视角
尽管对后工业用地的未来进行了大量研究,但很少有人对这些研究进行综合和联系。本文系统回顾了有关后工业用地再开发轨迹的国际文献。其目的是整合现有知识,找出差距,为今后的研究奠定坚实的基础。我们将回答以下问题:(i) 后工业用地再开发研究的趋势是什么?(iii) 这些因素是如何相互作用的?为了了解这些问题,我们对 2002 年至 2021 年间发表的 71 篇文章进行了系统的文献综述。通过统计和内容分析相结合的方法,我们注意到在 2010 年代中期,有关这一主题的研究有所增加。我们还注意到,单一案例研究最为常见,研究最多的领域位于亚洲大陆。此外,我们还发现了三种主要方法:工业遗产方法、棕地方法和治理方法。最后,我们确定了当前研究趋势中的差距和新的研究视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Land Use Policy
Land Use Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
553
期刊介绍: Land Use Policy is an international and interdisciplinary journal concerned with the social, economic, political, legal, physical and planning aspects of urban and rural land use. Land Use Policy examines issues in geography, agriculture, forestry, irrigation, environmental conservation, housing, urban development and transport in both developed and developing countries through major refereed articles and shorter viewpoint pieces.
期刊最新文献
Rethinking household food security under a changing climate in drought prone areas of Ethiopia Analysis of demand for land consolidation works in Poland – A case study of the Bałtów commune A mechanics-based theoretical framework of urban sprawl force: A case study in Nanjing, Wuxi, and Yangzhou, China Long-term landscape structure change in contrasting land occupation strategies of the Brazilian Amazon Co-design in policy development: Leveraging opportunities, addressing challenges, and proposing solutions for inclusive governance - Lessons from England
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1