Routine cognitive screening for older people undergoing major elective surgery: Benefits, risks and costs.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1177/0310057X241232421
Luke Km Chan, Alwin Chuan, Christophe R Berney, Daniel Ky Chan
{"title":"Routine cognitive screening for older people undergoing major elective surgery: Benefits, risks and costs.","authors":"Luke Km Chan, Alwin Chuan, Christophe R Berney, Daniel Ky Chan","doi":"10.1177/0310057X241232421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive impairment and older age are major risk factors for postoperative delirium. Professional societies have advocated preoperative screening to identify at-risk individuals for implementation of interventions, which have moderate effectiveness in preventing delirium. However, it remains unclear from the guidelines whether screening should be completed routinely for all older individuals or targeted, and also which specific screening tool is preferred. In addition, the responsibility for screening remains undesignated in the guidelines provided. We reviewed the benefits and risks of routine screening. We also performed a cost-benefit analysis of routine screening (versus no screening). Furthermore, we summarised the sensitivities and specificities of commonly used screening tools and reviewed evolving screening tools that may have an increasing role in future practice. We concluded that routine screening is useful and appears to be cost-effective for reducing postoperative delirium, with a cost-benefit ratio of 2.89 (adjusted ratio of 2.34), and has additional advantages over other approaches such as targeted screening or routine intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":7746,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":" ","pages":"275-282"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X241232421","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cognitive impairment and older age are major risk factors for postoperative delirium. Professional societies have advocated preoperative screening to identify at-risk individuals for implementation of interventions, which have moderate effectiveness in preventing delirium. However, it remains unclear from the guidelines whether screening should be completed routinely for all older individuals or targeted, and also which specific screening tool is preferred. In addition, the responsibility for screening remains undesignated in the guidelines provided. We reviewed the benefits and risks of routine screening. We also performed a cost-benefit analysis of routine screening (versus no screening). Furthermore, we summarised the sensitivities and specificities of commonly used screening tools and reviewed evolving screening tools that may have an increasing role in future practice. We concluded that routine screening is useful and appears to be cost-effective for reducing postoperative delirium, with a cost-benefit ratio of 2.89 (adjusted ratio of 2.34), and has additional advantages over other approaches such as targeted screening or routine intervention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对接受重大择期手术的老年人进行常规认知筛查:益处、风险和成本。
认知障碍和高龄是术后谵妄的主要风险因素。专业协会提倡通过术前筛查来识别高危人群,以便实施干预措施,这些措施对预防谵妄有一定的效果。然而,指南中仍然没有明确指出筛查是应该对所有老年人进行常规筛查还是有针对性地进行筛查,也没有明确指出哪种特定的筛查工具更可取。此外,所提供的指南中仍未指明筛查的责任。我们审查了常规筛查的益处和风险。我们还对常规筛查(与不筛查)进行了成本效益分析。此外,我们还总结了常用筛查工具的敏感性和特异性,并回顾了不断发展的筛查工具,这些工具在未来的实践中可能会发挥越来越大的作用。我们得出的结论是,常规筛查对于减少术后谵妄非常有用,而且似乎具有成本效益,其成本效益比为 2.89(调整后的比值为 2.34),与目标筛查或常规干预等其他方法相比具有更多优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
150
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Anaesthesia and Intensive Care is an international journal publishing timely, peer reviewed articles that have educational value and scientific merit for clinicians and researchers associated with anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, and pain medicine.
期刊最新文献
Experiences and outcomes of patients participating in a perioperative shared decision-making pathway. JG Farrell and The Lung: An early description of intensive care delirium in literature. Promoting behavioural change by educating anaesthetists about the environmental impact of inhalational anaesthetic agents: A systematic review. MET call prevention. A cross-sectional study of the relationship between iron deficiency anaemia and chronic pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1