Doses, serum concentrations and diagnoses of Norwegian quetiapine users 2001–2019 in a therapeutic drug monitoring material

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1111/bcpt.14074
Håvard Breivik, Andreas Austgulen Westin, Joachim Frost
{"title":"Doses, serum concentrations and diagnoses of Norwegian quetiapine users 2001–2019 in a therapeutic drug monitoring material","authors":"Håvard Breivik,&nbsp;Andreas Austgulen Westin,&nbsp;Joachim Frost","doi":"10.1111/bcpt.14074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Over the past decade, increasing off-label use of quetiapine has been reported worldwide from various sources. We wanted to investigate how this is reflected in therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) data. Requisitions for serum concentration measurements of quetiapine from a TDM service in Central Norway during 2001–2019 were obtained and analysed for age, gender, trends in quetiapine doses, serum concentrations and indicators of diagnoses. There were 19 759 requisitions from 7459 individuals. Daily doses of quetiapine decreased by 24 mg per year (95% CI: −25.61 to −21.48, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, <i>N</i> = 4505). A corresponding decrease in quetiapine serum concentrations was not seen. The proportion of requisitions with diagnoses indicating reimbursable use was 13% for the whole study period. Mean daily doses were slightly higher in the reimbursable group, but declined over time in these samples, as well. To our understanding, these results signal a trend towards lower prescribed doses of quetiapine, possibly reflecting drug repurposing and/or off-label use. The discrepancy in the decrease of doses <i>versus</i> serum concentrations may reflect the intake of higher doses than prescribed and/or inappropriate TDM sampling. Our findings show that TDM data have limitations when it comes to making inferences about the use of quetiapine based on serum concentrations and clinical information on the requisitions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8733,"journal":{"name":"Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology","volume":"135 4","pages":"523-533"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bcpt.14074","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcpt.14074","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past decade, increasing off-label use of quetiapine has been reported worldwide from various sources. We wanted to investigate how this is reflected in therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) data. Requisitions for serum concentration measurements of quetiapine from a TDM service in Central Norway during 2001–2019 were obtained and analysed for age, gender, trends in quetiapine doses, serum concentrations and indicators of diagnoses. There were 19 759 requisitions from 7459 individuals. Daily doses of quetiapine decreased by 24 mg per year (95% CI: −25.61 to −21.48, p < 0.001, N = 4505). A corresponding decrease in quetiapine serum concentrations was not seen. The proportion of requisitions with diagnoses indicating reimbursable use was 13% for the whole study period. Mean daily doses were slightly higher in the reimbursable group, but declined over time in these samples, as well. To our understanding, these results signal a trend towards lower prescribed doses of quetiapine, possibly reflecting drug repurposing and/or off-label use. The discrepancy in the decrease of doses versus serum concentrations may reflect the intake of higher doses than prescribed and/or inappropriate TDM sampling. Our findings show that TDM data have limitations when it comes to making inferences about the use of quetiapine based on serum concentrations and clinical information on the requisitions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗药物监测材料中 2001-2019 年挪威喹硫平使用者的剂量、血清浓度和诊断。
过去十年间,全球范围内有各种渠道报道了越来越多的喹硫平标示外使用情况。我们希望调查治疗药物监测(TDM)数据是如何反映这一现象的。我们从挪威中部的一家TDM服务机构获得了2001-2019年期间的喹硫平血清浓度测量申请单,并对其年龄、性别、喹硫平剂量趋势、血清浓度和诊断指标进行了分析。共有 7459 人提交了 19 759 份申请。喹硫平的日剂量每年减少24毫克(95% CI:-25.61至-21.48,p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
126
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Basic & Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology is an independent journal, publishing original scientific research in all fields of toxicology, basic and clinical pharmacology. This includes experimental animal pharmacology and toxicology and molecular (-genetic), biochemical and cellular pharmacology and toxicology. It also includes all aspects of clinical pharmacology: pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, therapeutic drug monitoring, drug/drug interactions, pharmacogenetics/-genomics, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacovigilance, pharmacoeconomics, randomized controlled clinical trials and rational pharmacotherapy. For all compounds used in the studies, the chemical constitution and composition should be known, also for natural compounds.
期刊最新文献
Effects of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Alcohol Use Disorder Fluvoxamine Inhibited NLRP3 and NF-κB Inflammatory Pathways and Maintained Genital Functions by Ameliorating CD-MPR, KISS-1, AQP4 and Claudin-1 Expressions In Vivo Investigation of the Effects of Nonylphenol on the Pituitary–Adrenal Axis and Pineal Gland in Male Rats Addressing Improper Medicine Storage Practices: Commentary on Louhisalmi et  al.'s Study Plasma NGAL, suPAR, KIM-1 and GDF-15 for Improving Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimation in Older Hospitalized Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1