[Electrophysiological technique for treatment of chronic prostatiti: Curative effect observation].

Q4 Medicine 中华男科学杂志 Pub Date : 2024-07-01

Song Wang, Jian-Xin Hu, Shan Wang, Chao Peng, Ji Cai, Min Ding

{"title":"[Electrophysiological technique for treatment of chronic prostatiti: Curative effect observation].","authors":"Song Wang, Jian-Xin Hu, Shan Wang, Chao Peng, Ji Cai, Min Ding","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To observe the clinical effect of electrophysiological technique in treating chronic prostatitis.Methods: Choose 40 patients of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (chronicprostatis/chronicpelvicpainsyndrome, CP/CPPS) in People's Hospital in Zhijin and People's hospital in Guizhou Province from January 2022 to April 2023, The patients were randomly divided into control group (n=20) and treatment group (n=20). The treatment group received low-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation combined with drug therapy, while the control group received drug therapy alone. The improvement of prostatitis symptom score (NIH-CPSI) and International Prostatitis Symptom score (IPSS) before and after treatment was compared and analyzed.Results: A total of 37 patients were followed up (1 patient in the treatment group withdrew due to hypersensitivity to the electrode; 2 patients in the control group were lost to follow-up. )There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups (P > 0.05). The NIH-CPSI score and IPSS score before and after treatment were compared between the two groups, and the difference was statistically significant (P< 0.05). The IPSS score of the two groups after treatment was compared, the average reduction of the treatment group was 15.84±0.92 points, and that of the control group was 7.17±0.40 points, and the difference was statistically significant (t=4.792, P< 0.05). The NIH-CPSI score of the two groups after treatment was compared, and the average reduction was 17.47±0.92 points in the treatment group and 10.56±0.49 points in the control group. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (t=6.654, P< 0.05).Conclusion: The effect of electrophysiological combined drug therapy is obviously better than that of simple drug therapy. Electrophysiological therapy for chronic prostatitis has definite clinical effect and is worth promoting and applying.","PeriodicalId":24012,"journal":{"name":"中华男科学杂志","volume":"30 7","pages":"611-615"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华男科学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To observe the clinical effect of electrophysiological technique in treating chronic prostatitis.

Methods: Choose 40 patients of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (chronicprostatis/chronicpelvicpainsyndrome, CP/CPPS) in People's Hospital in Zhijin and People's hospital in Guizhou Province from January 2022 to April 2023, The patients were randomly divided into control group (n=20) and treatment group (n=20). The treatment group received low-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation combined with drug therapy, while the control group received drug therapy alone. The improvement of prostatitis symptom score (NIH-CPSI) and International Prostatitis Symptom score (IPSS) before and after treatment was compared and analyzed.

Results: A total of 37 patients were followed up (1 patient in the treatment group withdrew due to hypersensitivity to the electrode; 2 patients in the control group were lost to follow-up. )There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups (P > 0.05). The NIH-CPSI score and IPSS score before and after treatment were compared between the two groups, and the difference was statistically significant (P< 0.05). The IPSS score of the two groups after treatment was compared, the average reduction of the treatment group was 15.84±0.92 points, and that of the control group was 7.17±0.40 points, and the difference was statistically significant (t=4.792, P< 0.05). The NIH-CPSI score of the two groups after treatment was compared, and the average reduction was 17.47±0.92 points in the treatment group and 10.56±0.49 points in the control group. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (t=6.654, P< 0.05).

Conclusion: The effect of electrophysiological combined drug therapy is obviously better than that of simple drug therapy. Electrophysiological therapy for chronic prostatitis has definite clinical effect and is worth promoting and applying.

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

[电生理技术治疗慢性前列腺炎：疗效观察]。

目的：观察电生理技术治疗慢性前列腺炎的临床效果：观察电生理技术治疗慢性前列腺炎的临床效果：选择2022年1月至2023年4月在贵州省织金县人民医院和贵州省人民医院就诊的40例慢性前列腺炎/慢性盆腔疼痛综合征（chronicprostatis/chronicpelvicpainsyndrome，CP/CPPS）患者，随机分为对照组（20例）和治疗组（20例）。治疗组接受低频神经肌肉电刺激联合药物治疗，对照组仅接受药物治疗。对比分析治疗前后前列腺炎症状评分（NIH-CPSI）和国际前列腺炎症状评分（IPSS）的改善情况：共对37名患者进行了随访（治疗组有1名患者因对电极过敏而退出，对照组有2名患者失去随访）。两组患者的基线数据无明显差异（P>0.05）。两组患者治疗前后的 NIH-CPSI 评分和 IPSS 评分比较，差异有统计学意义（P< 0.05）。比较两组治疗后的 IPSS 评分，治疗组平均（15.84±0.92）分，对照组平均（7.17±0.40）分，差异有统计学意义（t=4.792，P<0.05）。比较两组治疗后的 NIH-CPSI 评分，治疗组平均降低（17.47±0.92）分，对照组平均降低（10.56±0.49）分，差异有统计学意义（t=4.792，P<0.05）。两组比较差异有统计学意义（t=6.654，P< 0.05）：结论：电生理联合药物治疗效果明显优于单纯药物治疗。电生理治疗慢性前列腺炎临床疗效确切，值得推广应用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

中华男科学杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

5367

期刊介绍： National journal of andrology was founded in June 1995. It is a core journal of andrology and reproductive medicine, published monthly, and is publicly distributed at home and abroad. The main columns include expert talks, monographs (basic research, clinical research, evidence-based medicine, traditional Chinese medicine), reviews, clinical experience exchanges, case reports, etc. Priority is given to various fund-funded projects, especially the 12th Five-Year National Support Plan and the National Natural Science Foundation funded projects. This journal is included in about 20 domestic databases, including the National Science and Technology Paper Statistical Source Journal (China Science and Technology Core Journal), the Source Journal of the China Science Citation Database, the Statistical Source Journal of the China Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database (CAJCED), the Full-text Collection Journal of the China Journal Full-text Database (CJFD), the Overview of the Chinese Core Journals (2017 Edition), and the Source Journal of the Top Academic Papers of China's Fine Science and Technology Journals (F5000). It has been included in the full text of the American Chemical Abstracts, the American MEDLINE, the American EBSCO, and the database.