{"title":"[Traditional Chinese medicinal compress combined with herbal fumigation for acute epididymitis: A clinical observation].","authors":"Xin Zhao, Yu Yu, Ao-Mei Li, Wei Shang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To observe the clinical efficacy of traditional Chinese medicinal (TCM) compress combined with herbal fumigation in the treatment of acute epididymitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 74 cases of acute epididymitis treated in our hospital from December 2021 to December 2023. Using the single blind and random number methods, we divided the patients into a trial (n = 37) and a control group (n = 37). On the basis of routine medication with antibiotics, we treated the patients in the trial group by TCM compress combined with herbal fumigation and those in the control group by dyed pure water compress combined with herbal fumigation. At 3, 7 and 14 days of treatment, we obtained the pain scores and maximum epididymal diameters from the patients and compared them between the two groups before and after treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no statistically significant differences between the control and trial groups in the baseline pain scores (6.79 vs 6.85, P>0.05) and maximum epididymal diameters of the patients ([1.61 ± 0.39] vs [1.59 ± 0.42] cm, P>0.05) or in the pain scores after 3 days of treatment (4.63 ± 0.95 vs 4.45 ± 1.87, P>0.05). Compared with the controls, the patients of the trial group showed significantly lower pain scores (3.78 ±1.03 vs 1.02±0.36, P<0.05) and a higher overall effectiveness rate (75.68% vs 91.89%, P<0.05) at 7 days, and markedly shorter maximum epididymal diameters at 3 days ([1.45 ± 0.38] vs [1.23 ± 0.72] cm, P<0.05) and 7 days ([1.21 ± 0.29] vs [0.98 ± 0.15] cm, P<0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed between the control and trial groups in the pain scores (0.79 ± 1.12 vs 0.67 ± 0.86, P>0.05), maximum epididymal diameters ([0.94 ± 0.33] vs [0.92 ± 0.21] cm, P>0.05) or overall effectiveness rate (91.89% vs 97.30%, P>0.05) after 14 days of treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>On the basis of routine medication with antibiotics, TCM compress combined with herbal fumigation can effectively relieve pain, reduce local swelling, accelerate recovery and shorten the course of treatment in patients with acute epididymitis, and is therefore worthy of clinical promotion and application.</p>","PeriodicalId":24012,"journal":{"name":"中华男科学杂志","volume":"30 7","pages":"648-652"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华男科学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To observe the clinical efficacy of traditional Chinese medicinal (TCM) compress combined with herbal fumigation in the treatment of acute epididymitis.
Methods: This study included 74 cases of acute epididymitis treated in our hospital from December 2021 to December 2023. Using the single blind and random number methods, we divided the patients into a trial (n = 37) and a control group (n = 37). On the basis of routine medication with antibiotics, we treated the patients in the trial group by TCM compress combined with herbal fumigation and those in the control group by dyed pure water compress combined with herbal fumigation. At 3, 7 and 14 days of treatment, we obtained the pain scores and maximum epididymal diameters from the patients and compared them between the two groups before and after treatment.
Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the control and trial groups in the baseline pain scores (6.79 vs 6.85, P>0.05) and maximum epididymal diameters of the patients ([1.61 ± 0.39] vs [1.59 ± 0.42] cm, P>0.05) or in the pain scores after 3 days of treatment (4.63 ± 0.95 vs 4.45 ± 1.87, P>0.05). Compared with the controls, the patients of the trial group showed significantly lower pain scores (3.78 ±1.03 vs 1.02±0.36, P<0.05) and a higher overall effectiveness rate (75.68% vs 91.89%, P<0.05) at 7 days, and markedly shorter maximum epididymal diameters at 3 days ([1.45 ± 0.38] vs [1.23 ± 0.72] cm, P<0.05) and 7 days ([1.21 ± 0.29] vs [0.98 ± 0.15] cm, P<0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed between the control and trial groups in the pain scores (0.79 ± 1.12 vs 0.67 ± 0.86, P>0.05), maximum epididymal diameters ([0.94 ± 0.33] vs [0.92 ± 0.21] cm, P>0.05) or overall effectiveness rate (91.89% vs 97.30%, P>0.05) after 14 days of treatment.
Conclusion: On the basis of routine medication with antibiotics, TCM compress combined with herbal fumigation can effectively relieve pain, reduce local swelling, accelerate recovery and shorten the course of treatment in patients with acute epididymitis, and is therefore worthy of clinical promotion and application.
目的:观察中药敷贴联合中药熏蒸治疗急性附睾炎的临床疗效:观察中药敷贴联合中药熏蒸治疗急性附睾炎的临床疗效:研究对象为我院2021年12月至2023年12月收治的74例急性附睾炎患者。采用单盲法和随机数字法,将患者分为试验组(37 例)和对照组(37 例)。在常规使用抗生素的基础上,试验组患者采用中医敷贴结合中药熏蒸的方法进行治疗,对照组患者采用纯净水染色敷贴结合中药熏蒸的方法进行治疗。在治疗 3 天、7 天和 14 天时,我们采集了患者的疼痛评分和附睾最大直径,并对两组患者治疗前后的疼痛评分和附睾最大直径进行了比较:结果:对照组和试验组的基线疼痛评分(6.79 vs 6.85,P>0.05)、患者附睾最大直径([1.61 ± 0.39] vs [1.59 ± 0.42]cm,P>0.05)以及治疗3天后的疼痛评分(4.63 ± 0.95 vs 4.45 ± 1.87,P>0.05)差异均无统计学意义。与对照组相比,试验组患者在治疗14天后疼痛评分(3.78±1.03 vs 1.02±0.36,P0.05)、附睾最大直径([0.94±0.33] vs [0.92±0.21]cm,P>0.05)或总有效率(91.89% vs 97.30%,P>0.05)均明显降低:结论:在常规抗生素治疗的基础上,中药敷贴联合中药熏蒸治疗急性附睾炎,可有效缓解疼痛、减轻局部肿胀、加快康复、缩短疗程,值得临床推广应用。
期刊介绍:
National journal of andrology was founded in June 1995. It is a core journal of andrology and reproductive medicine, published monthly, and is publicly distributed at home and abroad. The main columns include expert talks, monographs (basic research, clinical research, evidence-based medicine, traditional Chinese medicine), reviews, clinical experience exchanges, case reports, etc. Priority is given to various fund-funded projects, especially the 12th Five-Year National Support Plan and the National Natural Science Foundation funded projects. This journal is included in about 20 domestic databases, including the National Science and Technology Paper Statistical Source Journal (China Science and Technology Core Journal), the Source Journal of the China Science Citation Database, the Statistical Source Journal of the China Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database (CAJCED), the Full-text Collection Journal of the China Journal Full-text Database (CJFD), the Overview of the Chinese Core Journals (2017 Edition), and the Source Journal of the Top Academic Papers of China's Fine Science and Technology Journals (F5000). It has been included in the full text of the American Chemical Abstracts, the American MEDLINE, the American EBSCO, and the database.