Intraurethral Instillation of Ketamine and Lidocaine versus Lidocaine for Male Rigid Cystoscopy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Q4 Medicine Kathmandu University Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-01
U Pradhan, P R Chalise, B R Luitel, S Kriti, S Devkota
{"title":"Intraurethral Instillation of Ketamine and Lidocaine versus Lidocaine for Male Rigid Cystoscopy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"U Pradhan, P R Chalise, B R Luitel, S Kriti, S Devkota","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Male rigid cystoscopy is one of the most common outpatient procedures in urology because of it lower cost, better optical area and better orientation compared with flexible devices. However, performing rigid cystoscopy is not only painful but equally apprehensive in awake male patients. Objective The study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of lidocaine gel and ketamine solution together compared with lidocaine gel alone during male rigid cystoscopy. Method A total of 76 male patients who visited the hospital for rigid cystoscopy were randomized into two groups before undergoing cystoscopy. The experimental group received 15 ml lidocaine with 2 ml (100 mg) Ketamine solution while the control group received 15 ml lidocaine gel with 2 ml Normal saline. Patient's heart rate and mean arterial pressure were recorded in five minutes interval till twenty minutes after completion of the procedure. The level of pain perception of all the patients was measured with Visual analogue scale (VAS) score, at the beginning, during and after cystoscopy. Independent sample t-test was used to compare outcome measures and p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Result Out of the total 70 patients analyzed at the end of study with 35 patients in each group, the VAS score in each stage were lower in lidocaine plus ketamine group compared to lidocaine gel alone. The difference was significant at the commencement and middle of the procedure (p < 0.05). Conclusion Intraurethral instillation of ketamine and lidocaine is more effective in reducing mean pain score during cystoscopy as compared to lidocaine alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":35493,"journal":{"name":"Kathmandu University Medical Journal","volume":"21 84","pages":"367-371"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kathmandu University Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Male rigid cystoscopy is one of the most common outpatient procedures in urology because of it lower cost, better optical area and better orientation compared with flexible devices. However, performing rigid cystoscopy is not only painful but equally apprehensive in awake male patients. Objective The study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of lidocaine gel and ketamine solution together compared with lidocaine gel alone during male rigid cystoscopy. Method A total of 76 male patients who visited the hospital for rigid cystoscopy were randomized into two groups before undergoing cystoscopy. The experimental group received 15 ml lidocaine with 2 ml (100 mg) Ketamine solution while the control group received 15 ml lidocaine gel with 2 ml Normal saline. Patient's heart rate and mean arterial pressure were recorded in five minutes interval till twenty minutes after completion of the procedure. The level of pain perception of all the patients was measured with Visual analogue scale (VAS) score, at the beginning, during and after cystoscopy. Independent sample t-test was used to compare outcome measures and p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Result Out of the total 70 patients analyzed at the end of study with 35 patients in each group, the VAS score in each stage were lower in lidocaine plus ketamine group compared to lidocaine gel alone. The difference was significant at the commencement and middle of the procedure (p < 0.05). Conclusion Intraurethral instillation of ketamine and lidocaine is more effective in reducing mean pain score during cystoscopy as compared to lidocaine alone.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尿道内灌注氯胺酮和利多卡因与利多卡因用于男性硬性膀胱镜检查:前瞻性随机对照试验。
背景男性硬性膀胱镜检查是泌尿外科最常见的门诊手术之一,因为与柔性设备相比,它成本更低、光学面积更大、定位更准确。然而,在清醒的男性患者中进行硬性膀胱镜检查不仅痛苦,而且同样令人担忧。本研究旨在评估男性硬性膀胱镜检查时利多卡因凝胶和氯胺酮溶液一起使用与单独使用利多卡因凝胶的疗效比较。方法 在接受膀胱镜检查前,将到医院接受硬性膀胱镜检查的 76 名男性患者随机分为两组。实验组接受 15 毫升利多卡因加 2 毫升(100 毫克)氯胺酮溶液,对照组接受 15 毫升利多卡因凝胶加 2 毫升生理盐水。在手术完成后的 20 分钟内,每隔五分钟记录一次患者的心率和平均动脉压。所有患者在膀胱镜检查开始、过程中和结束后的疼痛感水平均以视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分进行测量。结果比较采用独立样本 t 检验,P 值小于 0.05 为差异有统计学意义。结果 在研究结束时分析的 70 名患者(每组 35 人)中,利多卡因加氯胺酮组与单独使用利多卡因凝胶组相比,各阶段的 VAS 评分均较低。在手术开始阶段和中期,差异明显(P < 0.05)。结论 与单独使用利多卡因相比,尿道内灌注氯胺酮和利多卡因能更有效地降低膀胱镜检查过程中的平均疼痛评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Kathmandu University Medical Journal
Kathmandu University Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
期刊最新文献
Accuracy of Transvaginal Ultrasound Parameters and Bishop Score as Predictors of Successful Induction of Labor in Term High-Risk Pregnancy. An Unusual Presentation of Fatal Acute Haemorrhagic Pancreatitis in a Young Adult. Assessing Drug Utilization in the Emergency Medicine Department at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital Using WHO Drug Use Indicators. Assessment of Cardiopulmonary Fitness and Physical Activity in Health Science Students. Assessment of Oral Health and Nutritional Status of School Teachers in Dharamshala City, Himachal Pradesh.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1