Willingness to pay for cataract surgery and its associated factors in selected medical centers in Urmia, Iran.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation Pub Date : 2024-08-29 DOI:10.1186/s12962-024-00570-z
Fatemeh Rahmanzadeh, Cyrus Alinia, Behrouz Fathi, Hasan Yusefzadeh
{"title":"Willingness to pay for cataract surgery and its associated factors in selected medical centers in Urmia, Iran.","authors":"Fatemeh Rahmanzadeh, Cyrus Alinia, Behrouz Fathi, Hasan Yusefzadeh","doi":"10.1186/s12962-024-00570-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cataracts represent a significant public health issue and are the most prevalent vision disorder following refractive errors. They can restrict the economic, social, and psychological activities of those affected, thereby diminishing their quality of life. This study was undertaken to examine the willingness to pay for cataract surgery and the factors influencing this decision in selected medical centers in Urmia. The two-stage Heckman model was utilized to aid decision-making in financing this service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This research was a descriptive-analytical study evaluating the economic aspects of health interventions, conducted from the patient's perspective. In this cross-sectional study, a sample size of 217 patients with cataract issues was selected using Michel Carson's table. These patients were from Imam Khomeini Hospital and Aftab Urmia Surgery Center in 2023. Data was collected using a conditional valuation approach to determine the maximum amount patients were willing to pay, as gathered through a questionnaire. The factors influencing the willingness to pay for cataract surgery were estimated using the two-stage Heckman regression model. The final effect value of each variable was calculated using Stata version 14 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, 81.11% of participants (176 individuals) expressed a willingness to pay for cataract surgery, with the average amount they were willing to pay being $206.3. However, out of the 217 respondents, 41 rejected the proposed amounts and were not willing to pay anything. The results of the Hemken model indicated that the income of patients and the size of their households significantly influenced their willingness to pay for cataract surgery. However, other variables investigated did not have a significant impact.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study results revealed a significant influence of both income and household size on the likelihood of willingness to pay, as well as the extent of willingness to pay for cataract surgery. Consequently, it is crucial to formulate policies and provisions that guarantee access to cataract services, particularly for individuals from large households with low income and high costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47054,"journal":{"name":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","volume":"22 1","pages":"60"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363536/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-024-00570-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cataracts represent a significant public health issue and are the most prevalent vision disorder following refractive errors. They can restrict the economic, social, and psychological activities of those affected, thereby diminishing their quality of life. This study was undertaken to examine the willingness to pay for cataract surgery and the factors influencing this decision in selected medical centers in Urmia. The two-stage Heckman model was utilized to aid decision-making in financing this service.

Methods: This research was a descriptive-analytical study evaluating the economic aspects of health interventions, conducted from the patient's perspective. In this cross-sectional study, a sample size of 217 patients with cataract issues was selected using Michel Carson's table. These patients were from Imam Khomeini Hospital and Aftab Urmia Surgery Center in 2023. Data was collected using a conditional valuation approach to determine the maximum amount patients were willing to pay, as gathered through a questionnaire. The factors influencing the willingness to pay for cataract surgery were estimated using the two-stage Heckman regression model. The final effect value of each variable was calculated using Stata version 14 software.

Results: In this study, 81.11% of participants (176 individuals) expressed a willingness to pay for cataract surgery, with the average amount they were willing to pay being $206.3. However, out of the 217 respondents, 41 rejected the proposed amounts and were not willing to pay anything. The results of the Hemken model indicated that the income of patients and the size of their households significantly influenced their willingness to pay for cataract surgery. However, other variables investigated did not have a significant impact.

Conclusion: The study results revealed a significant influence of both income and household size on the likelihood of willingness to pay, as well as the extent of willingness to pay for cataract surgery. Consequently, it is crucial to formulate policies and provisions that guarantee access to cataract services, particularly for individuals from large households with low income and high costs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊朗乌尔米耶市部分医疗中心的白内障手术付费意愿及其相关因素。
引言白内障是一个重大的公共卫生问题,也是继屈光不正之后最普遍的视力障碍。白内障会限制患者的经济、社会和心理活动,从而降低他们的生活质量。本研究旨在考察乌尔米耶选定医疗中心的白内障手术支付意愿以及影响这一决定的因素。研究采用了两阶段赫克曼模型,以帮助做出为这项服务提供资金的决策:本研究是一项描述性分析研究,从患者的角度评估医疗干预措施的经济方面。在这项横断面研究中,使用米歇尔-卡森表选取了 217 名白内障患者作为样本。这些患者来自 2023 年的伊玛目霍梅尼医院和 Aftab Urmia 手术中心。数据收集采用条件估值法,通过问卷调查确定患者愿意支付的最高金额。采用两阶段赫克曼回归模型估算了影响白内障手术支付意愿的因素。每个变量的最终效应值使用 Stata 14 版软件进行计算:在这项研究中,81.11% 的参与者(176 人)表示愿意支付白内障手术费用,他们愿意支付的平均费用为 206.3 美元。然而,在 217 名受访者中,有 41 人拒绝接受建议的金额,不愿意支付任何费用。Hemken 模型的结果表明,患者的收入和家庭规模对其支付白内障手术费用的意愿有很大影响。结论:研究结果表明,白内障患者的收入和家庭规模对其支付白内障手术费用的意愿有显著影响:研究结果表明,收入和家庭规模对白内障手术的支付意愿以及支付意愿的程度均有显著影响。因此,制定相关政策和规定以保障白内障患者,尤其是低收入、高成本的大家庭成员获得白内障服务至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
59
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of cost-effectiveness analysis, including conceptual or methodological work, economic evaluations, and policy analysis related to resource allocation at a national or international level. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is aimed at health economists, health services researchers, and policy-makers with an interest in enhancing the flow and transfer of knowledge relating to efficiency in the health sector. Manuscripts are encouraged from researchers based in low- and middle-income countries, with a view to increasing the international economic evidence base for health.
期刊最新文献
Health system efficiency and equity in ASEAN: an empirical investigation. Coverage and distributional benefit-cost of rotavirus vaccine in Uganda: an analysis of routine health facility aggregated data. Cost-effectiveness of fenofibrate for preventing diabetic complications in Australia. Cost-effectiveness of high-dose vitamin D supplementation to reduce the occurrence of repeat episodes of pneumonia in children. Cost-effectiveness analysis of Tocilizumab compared to Adalimumab in the treatment of severe active rheumatoid arthritis in Iran.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1