Collateral is brain: Low perfusion triggers spreading depolarization and futile reperfusion after acute ischemic stroke.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1177/0271678X241270480
Anna Törteli, Réka Tóth, Ferenc Bari, Eszter Farkas, Ákos Menyhárt
{"title":"Collateral is brain: Low perfusion triggers spreading depolarization and futile reperfusion after acute ischemic stroke.","authors":"Anna Törteli, Réka Tóth, Ferenc Bari, Eszter Farkas, Ákos Menyhárt","doi":"10.1177/0271678X241270480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Futile reperfusion is a phenomenon of inadequate perfusion despite successful recanalization after acute ischemic stroke (AIS). It is associated with poor patient outcomes and has received increasing interest due to its clinical diagnosis becoming more common. However, the underlying mechanisms remain elusive, and experimental studies are focused on the pathological background of futile reperfusion. Our recent study has confirmed that poor primary collateralization plays a crucial role in the insufficiency of reperfusion after AIS in mice. Specifically, the absence of primary collaterals in the circle of Willis (CoW) promoted the development of spreading depolarizations (SDs) during AIS. In our experimental stroke model, the occurrence of SDs during ischemia always predicted futile reperfusion. Conversely, in mice with a complete CoW, no SDs were observed, and reperfusion was complete. Importantly, the human CoW displays variation in the primary collaterals in approximately 50% of the population. Therefore, futile reperfusion may result from SD evolution in AIS patients. Our purpose here is to emphasize the crucial role of SD in the development of futile reperfusion. We propose that adequate collateral recruitment can prevent SD occurrence, leading to improved reperfusion and AIS outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15325,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"1881-1887"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11529658/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X241270480","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Futile reperfusion is a phenomenon of inadequate perfusion despite successful recanalization after acute ischemic stroke (AIS). It is associated with poor patient outcomes and has received increasing interest due to its clinical diagnosis becoming more common. However, the underlying mechanisms remain elusive, and experimental studies are focused on the pathological background of futile reperfusion. Our recent study has confirmed that poor primary collateralization plays a crucial role in the insufficiency of reperfusion after AIS in mice. Specifically, the absence of primary collaterals in the circle of Willis (CoW) promoted the development of spreading depolarizations (SDs) during AIS. In our experimental stroke model, the occurrence of SDs during ischemia always predicted futile reperfusion. Conversely, in mice with a complete CoW, no SDs were observed, and reperfusion was complete. Importantly, the human CoW displays variation in the primary collaterals in approximately 50% of the population. Therefore, futile reperfusion may result from SD evolution in AIS patients. Our purpose here is to emphasize the crucial role of SD in the development of futile reperfusion. We propose that adequate collateral recruitment can prevent SD occurrence, leading to improved reperfusion and AIS outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
侧支就是大脑:急性缺血性脑卒中后,低灌注会引发蔓延性去极化和徒劳的再灌注。
再灌注失败是指急性缺血性卒中(AIS)后尽管再通路成功,但灌注不足的一种现象。它与患者的不良预后有关,由于其临床诊断越来越常见,因此受到越来越多的关注。然而,其潜在机制仍然难以捉摸,实验研究主要集中在无效再灌注的病理背景上。我们最近的研究证实,初级侧支不良在小鼠 AIS 后再灌注不足中起着关键作用。具体来说,Willis 圈(CoW)初级侧支的缺失促进了 AIS 期间扩张性去极化(SDs)的发展。在我们的中风实验模型中,缺血期间 SD 的发生总是预示着再灌注的失败。相反,在具有完全CoW的小鼠中,没有观察到SD,再灌注也是完全的。重要的是,人类约有 50% 的 CoW 在初级脉络上存在变异。因此,AIS 患者的 SD 演变可能导致再灌注无效。我们在此强调 SD 在无效再灌注中的关键作用。我们建议,充分的侧支募集可以防止 SD 的发生,从而改善再灌注和 AIS 的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
300
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: JCBFM is the official journal of the International Society for Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, which is committed to publishing high quality, independently peer-reviewed research and review material. JCBFM stands at the interface between basic and clinical neurovascular research, and features timely and relevant research highlighting experimental, theoretical, and clinical aspects of brain circulation, metabolism and imaging. The journal is relevant to any physician or scientist with an interest in brain function, cerebrovascular disease, cerebral vascular regulation and brain metabolism, including neurologists, neurochemists, physiologists, pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, neuroradiologists, neurosurgeons, neuropathologists and neuroscientists.
期刊最新文献
Cerebral microvascular physiology associated with white matter lesion burden differs by level of vascular risk in typically aging older adults. Associations of life-course cardiovascular risk factors with late-life cerebral haemodynamics. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of mitochondria transfer in models of central nervous system disease. Macrovascular blood flow and microvascular cerebrovascular reactivity are regionally coupled in adolescence. A dangerous liaison: Spreading depolarization and tissue acidification in cerebral ischemia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1