Family medicine viewed through the public lens: A national cross-sectional study in Lebanon.

IF 1.1 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-26 DOI:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_268_24
Manar Shalak, Manoj Nepal, Yasmina Al Ghadban, Jumana Antoun, Maya Romani
{"title":"Family medicine viewed through the public lens: A national cross-sectional study in Lebanon.","authors":"Manar Shalak, Manoj Nepal, Yasmina Al Ghadban, Jumana Antoun, Maya Romani","doi":"10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_268_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Family medicine (FM) is a medical specialty that provides continuing, comprehensive health care for the individual and the family. This study aimed to describe Lebanese citizens' knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward FM as a specialty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a national cross-sectional phone-based survey targeting the knowledge of the public about FM and its scope of practice. Questions were asked whether participants had primary health care doctors and their specialties.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 373 participants were included, with a response rate of 85.2%. Two-thirds were aware of the specialty of FM, while only 16.6% of the participants had previously visited a family physician. Most participants (69.7%) had a doctor they regularly consulted. One-third of participants had a general practitioner as their regular doctor. More than 80% of the participants agreed that FM physicians treat all family members with common and chronic diseases. Around 60% to 75% of participants knew that family physicians provide medical care to children, treat patients with psychiatric impairments, and perform minor surgeries. There was a significant gap in the participants' knowledge of FM physicians' role in managing obstetric or gynecologic patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite public awareness of FM, limited understanding and system challenges hinder its utilization in Lebanon. Educational campaigns, government-supported FM practices, and collaborations with public health initiatives are crucial to bridging the knowledge gap and establishing FM as the cornerstone of primary care. This knowledge gap challenges the specialty's identity and necessitates promoting FM as the cornerstone of primary care, potentially requiring a system-wide endorsement.</p>","PeriodicalId":15856,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11368271/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_268_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Family medicine (FM) is a medical specialty that provides continuing, comprehensive health care for the individual and the family. This study aimed to describe Lebanese citizens' knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward FM as a specialty.

Methods: This is a national cross-sectional phone-based survey targeting the knowledge of the public about FM and its scope of practice. Questions were asked whether participants had primary health care doctors and their specialties.

Results: A total of 373 participants were included, with a response rate of 85.2%. Two-thirds were aware of the specialty of FM, while only 16.6% of the participants had previously visited a family physician. Most participants (69.7%) had a doctor they regularly consulted. One-third of participants had a general practitioner as their regular doctor. More than 80% of the participants agreed that FM physicians treat all family members with common and chronic diseases. Around 60% to 75% of participants knew that family physicians provide medical care to children, treat patients with psychiatric impairments, and perform minor surgeries. There was a significant gap in the participants' knowledge of FM physicians' role in managing obstetric or gynecologic patients.

Conclusion: Despite public awareness of FM, limited understanding and system challenges hinder its utilization in Lebanon. Educational campaigns, government-supported FM practices, and collaborations with public health initiatives are crucial to bridging the knowledge gap and establishing FM as the cornerstone of primary care. This knowledge gap challenges the specialty's identity and necessitates promoting FM as the cornerstone of primary care, potentially requiring a system-wide endorsement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从公众视角看家庭医学:黎巴嫩全国横断面研究。
背景:家庭医学(FM)是一门为个人和家庭提供持续、全面医疗保健的医学专科。本研究旨在描述黎巴嫩公民对家庭医学这一专科的认识、态度和做法:这是一项全国性横断面电话调查,旨在了解公众对调频及其实践范围的认识。问题包括参与者是否有初级保健医生及其专业:共有 373 人参与了调查,回复率为 85.2%。三分之二的参与者知道调频的专业,而只有 16.6% 的参与者以前看过家庭医生。大多数参与者(69.7%)有定期咨询的医生。三分之一的参与者的固定医生是全科医生。超过 80% 的参与者认为,家庭医生会治疗所有家庭成员的常见病和慢性病。约有 60% 至 75% 的参与者知道家庭医生为儿童提供医疗服务、治疗精神障碍患者和进行小手术。参与者对家庭医生在管理产科或妇科病人方面的作用的了解存在很大差距:尽管公众对调频技术有所了解,但有限的认识和系统挑战阻碍了其在黎巴嫩的应用。教育活动、政府支持的妇产科实践以及与公共卫生倡议的合作对于缩小知识差距并将妇产科作为初级保健的基石至关重要。这种知识差距对该专科的身份提出了挑战,因此有必要将调频作为初级保健的基石加以推广,这可能需要全系统的认可。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
7.10%
发文量
884
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cultural practices and beliefs followed for new born care in Santhal pargana - A cross sectional study. Effect of mindfulness-based intervention on perceived stress among breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Family medicine viewed through the public lens: A national cross-sectional study in Lebanon. Medical complications in pregnancy. Mental health and well-being amongst adolescents in today's times.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1