Evolutionary selection and morphological integration in the hand of modern humans.

IF 1.7 2区 生物学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY American Journal of Biological Anthropology Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1002/ajpa.25024
Mikel Arlegi, Carlos Lorenzo
{"title":"Evolutionary selection and morphological integration in the hand of modern humans.","authors":"Mikel Arlegi, Carlos Lorenzo","doi":"10.1002/ajpa.25024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To enhance our understanding of the evolutionary dynamics of the modern human hand by analyzing the degree of integration and ability to respond to selection pressures of each phalanx and metacarpal bone.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The sample comprised 96 adult individuals, both female and male, from Euro-American, Afro-American, and European populations. We collected 10 linear measurements from the 19 metacarpals and proximal, middle, and distal phalanges that constitute the five digits of the hand. Using these data, we constructed variance/covariance matrices to quantify the degree of integration and assess the hand ability to respond to selective pressures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Distal phalanges are the most evolvable and flexible elements, while being the least integrated and constrained. The thumb is similarly integrated as the second and third rays, while medial rays (fourth and fifth digits) are more integrated. However, the thumb presents different integration and response to selection patterns. No significant relationship was found between functionality and the indices of selection and integration. Finally, the correlation between hand and foot indices yielded significant results for conditional evolvability and flexibility.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings suggest different evolutionary trajectories for the metacarpal and distal phalanx in the modern human thumb, likely reflecting varying functional and developmental pressures. The first metacarpal, characterized by high flexibility and low evolvability, appears to have reached a stable, optimal morphology, under stabilizing selection. In contrast, the distal phalanx seems to have undergone directional evolution, suggesting specialization for a specific function. Comparisons between hands and feet suggest that these structures evolve differently under directional selection but similarly under stabilizing selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":29759,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Biological Anthropology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Biological Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.25024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To enhance our understanding of the evolutionary dynamics of the modern human hand by analyzing the degree of integration and ability to respond to selection pressures of each phalanx and metacarpal bone.

Materials and methods: The sample comprised 96 adult individuals, both female and male, from Euro-American, Afro-American, and European populations. We collected 10 linear measurements from the 19 metacarpals and proximal, middle, and distal phalanges that constitute the five digits of the hand. Using these data, we constructed variance/covariance matrices to quantify the degree of integration and assess the hand ability to respond to selective pressures.

Results: Distal phalanges are the most evolvable and flexible elements, while being the least integrated and constrained. The thumb is similarly integrated as the second and third rays, while medial rays (fourth and fifth digits) are more integrated. However, the thumb presents different integration and response to selection patterns. No significant relationship was found between functionality and the indices of selection and integration. Finally, the correlation between hand and foot indices yielded significant results for conditional evolvability and flexibility.

Discussion: The findings suggest different evolutionary trajectories for the metacarpal and distal phalanx in the modern human thumb, likely reflecting varying functional and developmental pressures. The first metacarpal, characterized by high flexibility and low evolvability, appears to have reached a stable, optimal morphology, under stabilizing selection. In contrast, the distal phalanx seems to have undergone directional evolution, suggesting specialization for a specific function. Comparisons between hands and feet suggest that these structures evolve differently under directional selection but similarly under stabilizing selection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现代人手部的进化选择和形态整合。
研究目的通过分析每个指骨和掌骨的整合程度和对选择压力的反应能力,加深我们对现代人类手部进化动态的了解:样本包括来自欧美、非美和欧洲人群的 96 名成年男女个体。我们收集了构成手部五个指头的 19 个掌骨和近节、中节和远节指骨的 10 个线性测量值。利用这些数据,我们构建了方差/协方差矩阵来量化整合程度,并评估手部对选择性压力做出反应的能力:结果:远端指骨是最具进化性和灵活性的元素,同时也是最不整合和受限的元素。拇指的整合程度与第二和第三指骨相似,而内侧指骨(第四和第五指骨)的整合程度更高。然而,拇指呈现出不同的整合性和对选择模式的反应。在功能性与选择和整合指数之间没有发现明显的关系。最后,手部和足部指数之间的相关性在条件可进化性和灵活性方面产生了显著结果:讨论:研究结果表明,现代人拇指的掌骨和远端指骨有着不同的进化轨迹,这可能反映了不同的功能和发育压力。第一掌骨具有高灵活性和低进化性的特点,在稳定选择的作用下,第一掌骨似乎达到了稳定的最佳形态。与此相反,远端指骨似乎经历了定向进化,这表明其具有特定的功能。手和脚的比较表明,这些结构在定向选择下的进化方式不同,但在稳定选择下的进化方式相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The intersectional effects of sex and socioeconomic status on risk of mortality in industrializing England. Dying of pestilence: Stature and mortality from the Black Death in 14th-century Kyrgyzstan. Technical note: Does scan resolution or downsampling impact the analysis of trabecular bone architecture? Evolutionary selection and morphological integration in the hand of modern humans. "How Handy was early hominin 'know-how'?" An experimental approach exploring efficient early stone tool use.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1