A risk science perspective on the treatment of uncertainty in EIAs: An illustrative case from Norwegian EIA regulation

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environmental Impact Assessment Review Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107656
Kjartan Bjørnsen, Terje Aven
{"title":"A risk science perspective on the treatment of uncertainty in EIAs: An illustrative case from Norwegian EIA regulation","authors":"Kjartan Bjørnsen,&nbsp;Terje Aven","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Uncertainty is a central issue in environmental impact assessments (EIAs), as these assessments aim to predict future environmental consequences of proposed actions and development projects. Assessment, characterization, and management of such uncertainties have been discussed extensively in the literature on EIAs. Yet, calls are made for further work and improvements: There is a need for common terminology, principles and frameworks across specialized fields and applications. The present paper aims to contribute to this end by providing a risk science perspective on the understanding and treatment of uncertainties in EIAs. This perspective provides generic knowledge on concepts, principles, approaches, models and methods for assessing, characterizing, communicating and handling risk and uncertainties. An EIA can be seen as a study of future consequences and associated uncertainties, which in risk science captures the essential features of the risk concept. Following this logic, we analyze and illustrate how EIA can be seen as a special case of risk assessment. By considering the Norwegian EIA regulation, as well as key Norwegian EIA guidelines, we further demonstrate how different aspects of EIAs can be strengthened by adopting this perspective, including conceptual clarity and understanding. The paper concludes that integrating risk science concepts into established EIA practice is not straightforward, but further work on this integration can enhance both the EIA and risk fields.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 107656"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524002439","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Uncertainty is a central issue in environmental impact assessments (EIAs), as these assessments aim to predict future environmental consequences of proposed actions and development projects. Assessment, characterization, and management of such uncertainties have been discussed extensively in the literature on EIAs. Yet, calls are made for further work and improvements: There is a need for common terminology, principles and frameworks across specialized fields and applications. The present paper aims to contribute to this end by providing a risk science perspective on the understanding and treatment of uncertainties in EIAs. This perspective provides generic knowledge on concepts, principles, approaches, models and methods for assessing, characterizing, communicating and handling risk and uncertainties. An EIA can be seen as a study of future consequences and associated uncertainties, which in risk science captures the essential features of the risk concept. Following this logic, we analyze and illustrate how EIA can be seen as a special case of risk assessment. By considering the Norwegian EIA regulation, as well as key Norwegian EIA guidelines, we further demonstrate how different aspects of EIAs can be strengthened by adopting this perspective, including conceptual clarity and understanding. The paper concludes that integrating risk science concepts into established EIA practice is not straightforward, but further work on this integration can enhance both the EIA and risk fields.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从风险科学的角度看环境影响评估中不确定性的处理:挪威环境影响评估法规的说明性案例
不确定性是环境影响评估(EIAs)的核心问题,因为这些评估旨在预测拟议行动和发展项目的未来环境后果。在有关环境影响评估的文献中,已经对这种不确定性的评估、特征描述和管理进行了广泛的讨论。然而,也有人呼吁进一步开展工作并加以改进:需要在各个专业领域和应用中使用通用的术语、原则和框架。本文旨在从风险科学的角度来理解和处理环境影响评估中的不确定性,从而为实现这一目标做出贡献。这一视角提供了评估、描述、交流和处理风险与不确定性的概念、原则、方法、模型和方法方面的通用知识。环境影响评估可被视为对未来后果和相关不确定性的研究,在风险科学中,它抓住了风险概念的基本特征。按照这一逻辑,我们分析并说明了如何将环境影响评估视为风险评估的一个特例。通过考虑挪威的环境影响评估法规以及挪威环境影响评估的主要指导方针,我们进一步说明了采用这一观点可以如何加强环境影响评估的不同方面,包括概念的清晰度和理解。本文的结论是,将风险科学概念纳入既定的环境影响评估实践并非一蹴而就,但进一步开展这方面的整合工作可以加强环境影响评估和风险领域的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
期刊最新文献
When differentiated carbon tax policy meets LBD of renewable energy and electrification of energy end-use: Policy implications of sectoral differentiation of carbon productivity and carbon emission Climate policy and carbon leakage: Evidence from the low-carbon city pilot program in China Reducing fertilizer and pesticide application through mandatory agri-environmental regulation: Insights from “Two Zero” policy in China Unveiling the heterogeneity of environmental impacts of China's coal washing plants by a configuration-specific life cycle assessment Moving in the landscape: Omnidirectional connectivity dynamics in China from 1985 to 2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1