Perceived organizational politics and employee voice: A resource perspective

IF 10.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Research Pub Date : 2024-09-07 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114935
Yanzhe Zhou , Jian-Min (James) Sun
{"title":"Perceived organizational politics and employee voice: A resource perspective","authors":"Yanzhe Zhou ,&nbsp;Jian-Min (James) Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Existing studies have yielded inconsistent findings regarding whether employees’ perceptions of organizational politics (POP) inhibit or promote their voice behaviors. These controversies highlight the premature nature of reaching a definitive conclusion regarding the influence of POP on voice. Adopting an expansive view of voice behavior, this study considers the foci of voice and, through the lens of the conservation of resources, proposes that POP has distinct indirect effects on two types of voice behaviors (organization-targeted voice and self-targeted voice) via ego depletion. Moreover, perceived managerial openness serves as a moderator in these indirect effects, specifically moderating the relationship between ego depletion and voice behaviors. The hypotheses are supported by a three-wave time-lagged survey involving 247 employees. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"186 ","pages":"Article 114935"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296324004399","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Existing studies have yielded inconsistent findings regarding whether employees’ perceptions of organizational politics (POP) inhibit or promote their voice behaviors. These controversies highlight the premature nature of reaching a definitive conclusion regarding the influence of POP on voice. Adopting an expansive view of voice behavior, this study considers the foci of voice and, through the lens of the conservation of resources, proposes that POP has distinct indirect effects on two types of voice behaviors (organization-targeted voice and self-targeted voice) via ego depletion. Moreover, perceived managerial openness serves as a moderator in these indirect effects, specifically moderating the relationship between ego depletion and voice behaviors. The hypotheses are supported by a three-wave time-lagged survey involving 247 employees. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
感知到的组织政治和员工声音:资源视角
关于员工对组织政治(POP)的认知会抑制还是促进他们的声音行为,现有研究得出的结论并不一致。这些争议凸显了就 POP 对话语权的影响得出明确结论的时机尚不成熟。本研究采用广义的话语权行为视角,考虑了话语权的焦点,并通过资源保护的视角,提出 POP 通过自我消耗对两种类型的话语权行为(组织目标话语权和自我目标话语权)具有明显的间接影响。此外,感知到的管理开放性在这些间接影响中起到调节作用,特别是调节自我耗竭与发声行为之间的关系。一项涉及 247 名员工的三波时滞调查支持了上述假设。本文还讨论了对理论和实践的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
期刊最新文献
Content dissimilarity and online review helpfulness: Contextual insights Editorial Board Preventing algorithm aversion: People are willing to use algorithms with a learning label Agility in marketing teams: An analysis of factors influencing the entry decision into a trendy social network Socio-politically silent brands: A double edged sword
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1