Critical Inclusiveness: Prejudice, principles, and the social acceptance of Muslim minorities

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL International Journal of Intercultural Relations Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.102046
{"title":"Critical Inclusiveness: Prejudice, principles, and the social acceptance of Muslim minorities","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.102046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Criticism of minority group practices is commonly examined in terms of prejudice and racism, but might also coexist with a non-prejudiced inclusive attitude. With latent profile analysis, we examined how Dutch and German (<em>N</em>=3712) majority members combine their perception of gender inequality among Muslim minorities, feelings towards Muslims as a minority group, and support of Muslim expressive rights. Three identified subgroups perceived that Muslim minorities engage in gender inequality practices. In addition to reflecting anti-Muslim prejudices, for a third of the population this perception co-exists with an inclusive attitude indicating that non-prejudiced individuals can still be critical of specific minority practices. The subgroups’ distinctiveness is validated using indirect prejudice measures and considering authoritarianism. The findings present a more nuanced picture of the ways in which majority members can perceive minorities and demonstrate that an inclusive orientation can coincide with being critical towards perceived minority beliefs and practices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48216,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147176724001159","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Criticism of minority group practices is commonly examined in terms of prejudice and racism, but might also coexist with a non-prejudiced inclusive attitude. With latent profile analysis, we examined how Dutch and German (N=3712) majority members combine their perception of gender inequality among Muslim minorities, feelings towards Muslims as a minority group, and support of Muslim expressive rights. Three identified subgroups perceived that Muslim minorities engage in gender inequality practices. In addition to reflecting anti-Muslim prejudices, for a third of the population this perception co-exists with an inclusive attitude indicating that non-prejudiced individuals can still be critical of specific minority practices. The subgroups’ distinctiveness is validated using indirect prejudice measures and considering authoritarianism. The findings present a more nuanced picture of the ways in which majority members can perceive minorities and demonstrate that an inclusive orientation can coincide with being critical towards perceived minority beliefs and practices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
批判性包容:偏见、原则和社会对穆斯林少数民族的接纳
对少数群体做法的批评通常从偏见和种族主义的角度进行研究,但也可能与不带偏见的包容态度并存。通过潜在特征分析,我们研究了荷兰和德国(N=3712)多数群体成员如何将他们对穆斯林少数群体中性别不平等的看法、对穆斯林作为少数群体的感受以及对穆斯林表达权利的支持结合起来。三个已确定的分组认为穆斯林少数群体有性别不平等的行为。除了反映出反穆斯林的偏见之外,三分之一的人的这种看法与包容的态度并存,表明没有偏见的人仍然可以对少数群体的具体做法持批评态度。利用间接偏见测量法并考虑到专制主义,验证了亚群体的独特性。研究结果更加细致地描述了多数群体成员看待少数群体的方式,并表明包容性取向可能与对少数群体信仰和习俗的批判并存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: IJIR is dedicated to advancing knowledge and understanding of theory, practice, and research in intergroup relations. The contents encompass theoretical developments, field-based evaluations of training techniques, empirical discussions of cultural similarities and differences, and critical descriptions of new training approaches. Papers selected for publication in IJIR are judged to increase our understanding of intergroup tensions and harmony. Issue-oriented and cross-discipline discussion is encouraged. The highest priority is given to manuscripts that join theory, practice, and field research design. By theory, we mean conceptual schemes focused on the nature of cultural differences and similarities.
期刊最新文献
Academic adaptation of international students in the chinese higher education environment: A case study with mixed methods Bright and dark sides: Does collective behavior past participation experience affect participation willingness? Sense of belongingness, discrimination, and mental health: Associations and buffering effects of sense of belonging on mental health among Finnish native and immigrant-origin youth Sea turtles stranded ashore: Sociocultural dissonance and identity conflicts in migration intentions of Chinese international student returnees 50+ years of psychological acculturation research: Progress and challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1