How are discussions linked? A link analysis study on GitHub Discussions

IF 3.7 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Journal of Systems and Software Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2024.112196
{"title":"How are discussions linked? A link analysis study on GitHub Discussions","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2024.112196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Software development requires collaborative efforts and consensus among developers, emphasizing the need for effective communication and knowledge sharing within the teams. In line with this, GitHub introduced GitHub Discussions, a collaborative communication feature for the community around an open-source or internal project. The user-friendly interface of Discussions facilitates easy sharing of links to different resources. Maintainers highlight this feature’s significance, enabling users to maintain a well-informed project environment. We hypothesize that link-sharing activities in Discussions contribute to disseminating project knowledge. To investigate this hypothesis, we conducted a mixed-method study combining qualitative and quantitative analysis based on a convenience sample of ten open-source projects. We aimed to gain insight into the scope and intentions behind these shared links. Our findings indicate that link-sharing activities are common in the Discussions. Users share links to resources directly or indirectly related to the project/repository. Discussions users share links to project documentation, source code, and issues, aiming to clarify concepts, provide supplementary information, offer context to questions, and suggest new features. These findings offer insights for project maintainers to understand Discussions usage better and enable the GitHub Engineering team to promote the feature adoption.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Systems and Software","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Systems and Software","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121224002401","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Software development requires collaborative efforts and consensus among developers, emphasizing the need for effective communication and knowledge sharing within the teams. In line with this, GitHub introduced GitHub Discussions, a collaborative communication feature for the community around an open-source or internal project. The user-friendly interface of Discussions facilitates easy sharing of links to different resources. Maintainers highlight this feature’s significance, enabling users to maintain a well-informed project environment. We hypothesize that link-sharing activities in Discussions contribute to disseminating project knowledge. To investigate this hypothesis, we conducted a mixed-method study combining qualitative and quantitative analysis based on a convenience sample of ten open-source projects. We aimed to gain insight into the scope and intentions behind these shared links. Our findings indicate that link-sharing activities are common in the Discussions. Users share links to resources directly or indirectly related to the project/repository. Discussions users share links to project documentation, source code, and issues, aiming to clarify concepts, provide supplementary information, offer context to questions, and suggest new features. These findings offer insights for project maintainers to understand Discussions usage better and enable the GitHub Engineering team to promote the feature adoption.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
讨论是如何链接的?GitHub 讨论的链接分析研究
软件开发需要开发人员之间的协同努力和共识,这就强调了团队内部有效沟通和知识共享的必要性。为此,GitHub 推出了 GitHub Discussions,这是一项围绕开源项目或内部项目的社区协作交流功能。讨论 "界面友好,便于分享不同资源的链接。维护者强调了这一功能的重要性,它使用户能够维护一个消息灵通的项目环境。我们假设,讨论区中的链接共享活动有助于传播项目知识。为了研究这一假设,我们以十个开源项目为样本,进行了定性和定量分析相结合的混合方法研究。我们旨在深入了解这些共享链接背后的范围和意图。我们的研究结果表明,链接共享活动在讨论中很常见。用户共享与项目/资源库直接或间接相关的资源链接。讨论用户共享项目文档、源代码和问题的链接,目的是澄清概念、提供补充信息、提供问题的来龙去脉以及建议新功能。这些发现为项目维护者更好地了解讨论区的使用情况提供了见解,并使 GitHub 工程团队能够促进功能的采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Systems and Software
Journal of Systems and Software 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
193
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Systems and Software publishes papers covering all aspects of software engineering and related hardware-software-systems issues. All articles should include a validation of the idea presented, e.g. through case studies, experiments, or systematic comparisons with other approaches already in practice. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: • Methods and tools for, and empirical studies on, software requirements, design, architecture, verification and validation, maintenance and evolution • Agile, model-driven, service-oriented, open source and global software development • Approaches for mobile, multiprocessing, real-time, distributed, cloud-based, dependable and virtualized systems • Human factors and management concerns of software development • Data management and big data issues of software systems • Metrics and evaluation, data mining of software development resources • Business and economic aspects of software development processes The journal welcomes state-of-the-art surveys and reports of practical experience for all of these topics.
期刊最新文献
FSECAM: A contextual thematic approach for linking feature to multi-level software architectural components Exploring emergent microservice evolution in elastic deployment environments An empirical study of AI techniques in mobile applications Information needs in bug reports for web applications Development and benchmarking of multilingual code clone detector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1