Doing good for political gain: the instrumental use of the SDGs as nonmarket strategies

IF 8.6 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of International Business Studies Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1057/s41267-024-00723-5
Christiaan Röell, Felix Arndt, Mirko H. Benischke, Rebecca Piekkari
{"title":"Doing good for political gain: the instrumental use of the SDGs as nonmarket strategies","authors":"Christiaan Röell, Felix Arndt, Mirko H. Benischke, Rebecca Piekkari","doi":"10.1057/s41267-024-00723-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are changing the way multinational enterprises (MNEs) engage with host governments. The SDGs offer MNEs a unique opportunity to build political influence by assisting governments in attaining a host country’s social needs. However, international business scholars have largely remained silent on how MNEs strategize to repurpose ‘doing good’ into political influence. Based on a multiple case study of four Western European MNE subsidiaries in Indonesia, we uncover the strategies that MNEs use to turn their SDG initiatives into political access and influence. Our study reveals three nonmarket strategies – SDG-directed cross-sector partnership, SDG-directed conflict management, and SDG-directed constituency building. These actionable strategies help MNEs manage the tensions arising from misaligned government priorities, high levels of perceived corruption, and skepticism toward foreign firms. Our findings advance the literature on international nonmarket strategy by explaining how MNE subsidiaries resolve these tensions and convert SDG-directed investments into political access and influence without succumbing to locally institutionalized norms of corruption. Finally, our study suggests that emerging-market governments may benefit from rewarding MNEs for their investments that contribute to the SDGs, as long as they provide clear guidance and multi-stakeholder platforms that foster effective collaborations with MNEs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Business Studies","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Business Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-024-00723-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are changing the way multinational enterprises (MNEs) engage with host governments. The SDGs offer MNEs a unique opportunity to build political influence by assisting governments in attaining a host country’s social needs. However, international business scholars have largely remained silent on how MNEs strategize to repurpose ‘doing good’ into political influence. Based on a multiple case study of four Western European MNE subsidiaries in Indonesia, we uncover the strategies that MNEs use to turn their SDG initiatives into political access and influence. Our study reveals three nonmarket strategies – SDG-directed cross-sector partnership, SDG-directed conflict management, and SDG-directed constituency building. These actionable strategies help MNEs manage the tensions arising from misaligned government priorities, high levels of perceived corruption, and skepticism toward foreign firms. Our findings advance the literature on international nonmarket strategy by explaining how MNE subsidiaries resolve these tensions and convert SDG-directed investments into political access and influence without succumbing to locally institutionalized norms of corruption. Finally, our study suggests that emerging-market governments may benefit from rewarding MNEs for their investments that contribute to the SDGs, as long as they provide clear guidance and multi-stakeholder platforms that foster effective collaborations with MNEs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为政治利益而行善:将可持续发展目标作为非市场战略的工具性运用
联合国可持续发展目标(SDGs)正在改变跨国企业(MNEs)与东道国政府接触的方式。可持续发展目标为跨国企业提供了一个独特的机会,通过协助东道国政府满足其社会需求来建立政治影响力。然而,对于跨国企业如何制定战略,将 "行善 "转化为政治影响力,国际商业学者大多保持沉默。基于对四家西欧跨国企业在印尼子公司的多案例研究,我们揭示了跨国企业将其可持续发展目标倡议转化为政治准入和影响力的策略。我们的研究揭示了三种非市场战略--以可持续发展目标为导向的跨部门伙伴关系、以可持续发展目标为导向的冲突管理和以可持续发展目标为导向的选区建设。这些可行的战略有助于跨国企业管理因政府优先事项不一致、腐败严重以及对外国企业持怀疑态度而产生的紧张局势。我们的研究结果解释了跨国企业子公司如何解决这些矛盾,并将可持续发展目标导向的投资转化为政治参与和影响力,同时又不屈服于当地制度化的腐败规范,从而推动了国际非市场战略文献的发展。最后,我们的研究表明,只要新兴市场政府提供明确的指导和多方利益相关者平台,促进与跨国企业的有效合作,就可以从奖励跨国企业为可持续发展目标做出贡献的投资中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: The Selection Committee for the JIBS Decade Award is pleased to announce that the 2023 award will be presented to Anthony Goerzen, Christian Geisler Asmussen, and Bo Bernhard Nielsen for their article titled "Global cities and multinational enterprise location strategy," published in JIBS in 2013 (volume 44, issue 5, pages 427-450). The prestigious JIBS Decade Award, sponsored by Palgrave Macmillan, recognizes the most influential paper published in the Journal of International Business Studies from a decade earlier. The award will be presented at the annual AIB conference. To be eligible for the JIBS Decade Award, an article must be one of the top five most cited papers published in JIBS for the respective year. The Selection Committee for this year included Kaz Asakawa, Jeremy Clegg, Catherine Welch, and Rosalie L. Tung, serving as the Committee Chair and JIBS Editor-in-Chief, all from distinguished universities around the world.
期刊最新文献
Beyond global mobility: how human capital shapes the MNE in the 21st century How does colonial history matter for expatriate adjustment? The case of Brazilians in Portugal User language and cultural product innovation: insights from the global mobile gaming industry The boundaries of the law: can US private enforcement discipline foreign firms? International business research that moves Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1