Strategic design for Research and Innovation through a participatory approach: lessons learnt in a Veterinary Public Health Institution.

IF 0.5 4区 农林科学 Q4 VETERINARY SCIENCES Veterinaria italiana Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI:10.12834/VetIt.2565.23329.2
Valeria Mariano, Romano Zilli, Eda Maria Flores Rodas, Raniero Lorenzetti, Annalisa Paternò, Marina Bagni, Evgeniya Titarenco
{"title":"Strategic design for Research and Innovation through a participatory approach: lessons learnt in a Veterinary Public Health Institution.","authors":"Valeria Mariano, Romano Zilli, Eda Maria Flores Rodas, Raniero Lorenzetti, Annalisa Paternò, Marina Bagni, Evgeniya Titarenco","doi":"10.12834/VetIt.2565.23329.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The article describes the results and the experience gained in using a participatory approach to design a strategic development plan (SDP) in a veterinary public health institute. The bottom-up approach utilised was co-designed between the units of \"Research and Innovation\" and \"Training\". It included a survey administered to the institute staff (570 people) to collect inputs on three relevant areas: i) innovative research topics; ii) innovation needed to improve services; iii) new tools to carry out activities. After the survey, the following criteria were used to prioritise the research topics: appropriateness, relevance, capacity, impact and innovativeness. Based on the priority topics identified, small working groups were set up on a voluntary basis. The working groups, following the EuropeAid method, co-designed a SDP, set over a three-year period, with indications on aims, objectives, outputs, activities, SMART indicators, means of verification and targets. The method proved useful in continuing the process of institutional innovation, especially by stimulating the participation and commitment of younger innovative staff at the bottom of the hierarchical pyramid. The integration of the described method into regular management procedures would be desirable, to achieve more effective results.</p>","PeriodicalId":23550,"journal":{"name":"Veterinaria italiana","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinaria italiana","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12834/VetIt.2565.23329.2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article describes the results and the experience gained in using a participatory approach to design a strategic development plan (SDP) in a veterinary public health institute. The bottom-up approach utilised was co-designed between the units of "Research and Innovation" and "Training". It included a survey administered to the institute staff (570 people) to collect inputs on three relevant areas: i) innovative research topics; ii) innovation needed to improve services; iii) new tools to carry out activities. After the survey, the following criteria were used to prioritise the research topics: appropriateness, relevance, capacity, impact and innovativeness. Based on the priority topics identified, small working groups were set up on a voluntary basis. The working groups, following the EuropeAid method, co-designed a SDP, set over a three-year period, with indications on aims, objectives, outputs, activities, SMART indicators, means of verification and targets. The method proved useful in continuing the process of institutional innovation, especially by stimulating the participation and commitment of younger innovative staff at the bottom of the hierarchical pyramid. The integration of the described method into regular management procedures would be desirable, to achieve more effective results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过参与式方法进行研究与创新战略设计:从兽医公共卫生机构中汲取的经验教训。
文章介绍了一家兽医公共卫生研究所采用参与式方法设计战略发展计划(SDP)所取得的成果和经验。所采用的自下而上的方法是由 "研究与创新 "和 "培训 "两个单位共同设计的。它包括对研究所工作人员(570 人)进行调查,以收集三个相关领域的意见:i) 创新研究课题;ii) 改进服务所需的创新;iii) 开展活动的新工具。调查结束后,根据以下标准确定了研究课题的优先次序:适当性、相关性、能力、影 响和创新性。根据确定的优先主题,自愿成立了小型工作组。这些工作组按照欧洲援助方法,共同设计了一个为期三年的战略发展计划,其中说明了目的、目标、产出、活动、SMART 指标、核查手段和具体目标。事实证明,这种方法有助于继续推进机构创新进程,特别是通过激励处于金字塔底层的年轻 创新人员的参与和承诺。为了取得更有效的成果,最好将所述方法纳入常规管理程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinaria italiana
Veterinaria italiana VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal was created as the Croce Azzurra in 1950. A quarterly peer-reviewed journal devoted to veterinary public health and other aspects of veterinary science and medicine, Veterinaria Italiana is published by the Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell’Abruzzo e del Molise ‘G. Caporale’ (Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell''Abruzzo e del Molise) in Teramo, Italy. The goal of the journal is to provide an international platform for veterinary public health information from Italy and other countries, particularly those in Eastern Europe and Africa, Asia and South America. Veterinarians and veterinary public health specialists are encouraged to share their knowledge and experience on this platform.
期刊最新文献
SPREAD: Spatiotemporal Pathogen Relationships and Epidemiological Analysis Dashboard. Being prepared for an avian influenza epidemic with a One Health approach: a cartographic study to identify animal carcasses burial sites in central Italy. Grading Habitats for Ticks by Mapping a Suitability Index based on Remotely Sensed Data and Meta® population dataset in Aosta Valley, NW Italy. Using scenario tree modelling to evaluate the probability of freedom from Enzootic bovine leukosis (EBL) in Italy and Slovenia. Communication Breakdown - Of Disease Clusters, a Trillium and One Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1