Shade Outcome of 3Y, 4Y, 5Y Monolithic Zirconia on Colored Annodized Titanium

Katie Senkiw DMD, MAJ, DC
{"title":"Shade Outcome of 3Y, 4Y, 5Y Monolithic Zirconia on Colored Annodized Titanium","authors":"Katie Senkiw DMD, MAJ, DC","doi":"10.1016/j.dentre.2024.100133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>OBJECTIVES</h3><p>Zirconia has become a restorative material of choice on implant supported restorations due to its ability to obscure discoloration of metal abutments. This project observed if anodization of a titanium abutment minimizes the effect on the final restoration shade and if yttria content is correlated with the stability of the resultant shade.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>Six titanium abutments were milled based on a specific design and annodized at variable voltages: unanodized, 11V (bronze), 31V (blue), 54V (green), 64V (yellow), and 76V (pink). Sixty A2 monolithic zirconia crowns of 3Y, 4Y, and 5Y (Dentsply Sirona Cercon HT, IPS ZirCad MT, and Dentsply Sirona Cercon XT) were designed with 1mm measured uniform thickness over the titanium abutment. Spectrophotometer measurements were obtained on a control sample, and again over each abutment color. The ΔE00 was calculated for each sample for each abutment color/voltage.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>One way ANOVA for each sample set of 3Y, 4Y, and 5y zirconia materials found a highly significant (p&lt;.0001) difference between different anodized abutments. For all samples, blue showed the highest mean ΔE00 values which were significantly higher than all five groups (P&lt;.0001). The lowest mean ΔE00 for 3Y samples was unanodized titanium (p&lt;.05). The lowest ΔE00 for 4Y and 5Y samples was yellow (p&lt;.05). No pairwise comparisons were significant (p&gt;/=.26). A two-way ANOVA found no significant difference amongst type of material (p=.048).</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>Significant differences in shade were found utilizing varying voltages of anodized custom abutments. The yttria content of the zirconia had no overall effect on shade when placed over varying voltages of anodized custom abutments.</p></div><div><h3>IMPLICATIONS</h3><p>This study provides information on whether anodized titanium custom abutments under monolithic zirconia restorations influence the overall shade. This study provides recommendations regarding material choices and how different yttria content or translucencies of zirconia can alter the esthetic outcome of a final restoration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100364,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Review","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772559624000567/pdfft?md5=91f29f2eaef9f349c08b735017c9e35e&pid=1-s2.0-S2772559624000567-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772559624000567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Zirconia has become a restorative material of choice on implant supported restorations due to its ability to obscure discoloration of metal abutments. This project observed if anodization of a titanium abutment minimizes the effect on the final restoration shade and if yttria content is correlated with the stability of the resultant shade.

METHODS

Six titanium abutments were milled based on a specific design and annodized at variable voltages: unanodized, 11V (bronze), 31V (blue), 54V (green), 64V (yellow), and 76V (pink). Sixty A2 monolithic zirconia crowns of 3Y, 4Y, and 5Y (Dentsply Sirona Cercon HT, IPS ZirCad MT, and Dentsply Sirona Cercon XT) were designed with 1mm measured uniform thickness over the titanium abutment. Spectrophotometer measurements were obtained on a control sample, and again over each abutment color. The ΔE00 was calculated for each sample for each abutment color/voltage.

RESULTS

One way ANOVA for each sample set of 3Y, 4Y, and 5y zirconia materials found a highly significant (p<.0001) difference between different anodized abutments. For all samples, blue showed the highest mean ΔE00 values which were significantly higher than all five groups (P<.0001). The lowest mean ΔE00 for 3Y samples was unanodized titanium (p<.05). The lowest ΔE00 for 4Y and 5Y samples was yellow (p<.05). No pairwise comparisons were significant (p>/=.26). A two-way ANOVA found no significant difference amongst type of material (p=.048).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant differences in shade were found utilizing varying voltages of anodized custom abutments. The yttria content of the zirconia had no overall effect on shade when placed over varying voltages of anodized custom abutments.

IMPLICATIONS

This study provides information on whether anodized titanium custom abutments under monolithic zirconia restorations influence the overall shade. This study provides recommendations regarding material choices and how different yttria content or translucencies of zirconia can alter the esthetic outcome of a final restoration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
彩色阳极氧化钛上 3Y、4Y、5Y 整体氧化锆的色调结果
目的由于氧化锆能够遮盖金属基台的变色,因此已成为种植体支持修复体的首选修复材料。本项目观察钛基台的阳极氧化处理是否能最大程度地减少对最终修复体色泽的影响,以及钇含量是否与最终色泽的稳定性相关。方法根据特定设计铣制六个钛基台,并在不同电压下进行阳极氧化处理:未阳极氧化、11V(青铜)、31V(蓝色)、54V(绿色)、64V(黄色)和 76V(粉红色)。设计了 60 个 3Y、4Y 和 5Y 的 A2 整体氧化锆牙冠(Dentsply Sirona Cercon HT、IPS ZirCad MT 和 Dentsply Sirona Cercon XT),在钛基台上测量的均匀厚度为 1mm。对对照样本进行分光光度计测量,并再次对每种基台颜色进行测量。结果对 3Y、4Y 和 5Y 氧化锆材料的每组样品进行单向方差分析后发现,不同阳极氧化基台之间的差异非常显著 (p<.0001)。在所有样本中,蓝色样本的平均 ΔE00 值最高,明显高于所有五组样本(P< .0001)。3Y 样品中平均 ΔE00 值最低的是非阳极氧化钛(P< .05)。4Y 和 5Y 样品中平均 ΔE00 最低的是黄色(P< .05)。成对比较无显著性差异(p>/=.26)。通过双向方差分析发现,材料类型之间没有显著差异(p=.048)。在不同电压的阳极氧化定制基台上放置氧化锆时,氧化锆的钇含量对整体色调没有影响。本研究就材料选择以及氧化锆的不同钇含量或半透明度如何改变最终修复体的美学效果提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Soft tissue management as part of peri‑implantitis treatment: When, why and how? Engineered Small Extra-Cellular Vesicles for Endogenous Mesenchymal Stem Cells Recruitment and in situ Periodontal Tissue Regeneration Periodontitis Gingival Tissue Exosomes Cross and Compromise Human BBB in an In-Vitro 3D Model The Use of Phage Therapy in Reduction of Oral Cavity Bacteria: A Literature Review Will CAD/CAM Technology Increase the Effectiveness of Clinicians?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1