Listening ‘with’ children ‘to’ the more-than-human world: A diffractive analysis of the child and the challenge of sustainability

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Health Education Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1177/00178969241272865
Kathleen Theresa Bailey
{"title":"Listening ‘with’ children ‘to’ the more-than-human world: A diffractive analysis of the child and the challenge of sustainability","authors":"Kathleen Theresa Bailey","doi":"10.1177/00178969241272865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective:Listening to children has been frequently adopted by researchers working within a child’s rights paradigm, as an uncontested method that veritably represents children’s ‘voices’. Whether children can be understood to participate, and their voices represented veritably, when their lives are culturally situated and co-constructed with significant adults is debatable. The data this paper engages with were created by adopting Barad’s posthumanist methodology of diffraction to listen with children to the more-than-human world.Design/Method:Diffraction was deployed as both a creative knowledge-making practice and an analytical framework that sought insight into the ways in which children are affected by, and affect, ideologies of sustainability. Art-making was adopted as a method to enable children a medium for communication and expression. As children make sense of their social and material worlds through play, I considered it to be a form of performance art during the research. The art-making took place within a ‘wild’ park space in the UK with children age 18 months to 9 years old.Results:This paper engages with a sense-making story created during the research analysis to highlight one way in which children’s possibilities to know become foreclosed when they are filtered through societal constructions of the child as ‘vulnerable’ and how ideas of food production become framed as ‘taboo’ when talking to children.Conclusion:Children’s possibilities to contribute to discussion on issues that create sustainability dissonance seem to become limited. The agency attributed to children tasked with bringing about sustainability change seems questionable and implications for their health and well-being need to be considered.","PeriodicalId":47346,"journal":{"name":"Health Education Journal","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00178969241272865","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective:Listening to children has been frequently adopted by researchers working within a child’s rights paradigm, as an uncontested method that veritably represents children’s ‘voices’. Whether children can be understood to participate, and their voices represented veritably, when their lives are culturally situated and co-constructed with significant adults is debatable. The data this paper engages with were created by adopting Barad’s posthumanist methodology of diffraction to listen with children to the more-than-human world.Design/Method:Diffraction was deployed as both a creative knowledge-making practice and an analytical framework that sought insight into the ways in which children are affected by, and affect, ideologies of sustainability. Art-making was adopted as a method to enable children a medium for communication and expression. As children make sense of their social and material worlds through play, I considered it to be a form of performance art during the research. The art-making took place within a ‘wild’ park space in the UK with children age 18 months to 9 years old.Results:This paper engages with a sense-making story created during the research analysis to highlight one way in which children’s possibilities to know become foreclosed when they are filtered through societal constructions of the child as ‘vulnerable’ and how ideas of food production become framed as ‘taboo’ when talking to children.Conclusion:Children’s possibilities to contribute to discussion on issues that create sustainability dissonance seem to become limited. The agency attributed to children tasked with bringing about sustainability change seems questionable and implications for their health and well-being need to be considered.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与 "儿童一起 "倾听 "超越人类的世界":对儿童和可持续性挑战的衍射分析
目标:在儿童权利范式下开展工作的研究人员经常采用倾听儿童的方法,将其视为一种能够真实代表儿童 "声音 "的无可争议的方法。当儿童的生活处于文化环境中并与重要的成年人共同建构时,他们是否能被理解为参与其中,他们的声音是否能被真实地表达出来,这一点值得商榷。设计/方法:衍射既是一种创造性的知识创造实践,也是一种分析框架,旨在深入了解儿童受可持续发展意识形态影响的方式。艺术创作作为一种方法,为儿童提供了交流和表达的媒介。由于儿童通过游戏来理解他们的社会和物质世界,因此我认为这是研究期间的一种行为艺术形式。结果:本文通过研究分析过程中创造的一个感性认识故事,强调了当儿童被社会构建为 "弱势 "时,他们的认识可能性被剥夺的一种方式,以及当与儿童交谈时,食品生产的想法是如何被框定为 "禁忌 "的。儿童在实现可持续发展变革中的作用似乎值得怀疑,他们的健康和福祉也需要考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Health Education Journal is a leading peer reviewed journal established in 1943. It carries original papers on health promotion and education research, policy development and good practice.
期刊最新文献
Students', parents' and teachers' perspectives on comprehensive school-based sleep promotion. The effect of an educational intervention on healthy lifestyle knowledge and behaviour among middle-aged women Men’s experiences of HeadsUpGuys: A strength-based case study Listening ‘with’ children ‘to’ the more-than-human world: A diffractive analysis of the child and the challenge of sustainability Anatomically correct models for visually impaired learners: Teachers’ perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1