Changing Medical Student Perceptions of Mental Illness Through a Psychiatry Clinical Clerkship: A Longitudinal Qualitative Study

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Academic Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1007/s40596-024-02035-0
Amy E. Manley, Lucy Biddle, Jelena Savović, Paul Moran
{"title":"Changing Medical Student Perceptions of Mental Illness Through a Psychiatry Clinical Clerkship: A Longitudinal Qualitative Study","authors":"Amy E. Manley, Lucy Biddle, Jelena Savović, Paul Moran","doi":"10.1007/s40596-024-02035-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objective</h3><p>This study sought to understand whether perceptions of mental illness change during the course of students’ psychiatry clerkships, and what facilitates such change.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Using a longitudinal qualitative study design, the authors followed up 14 medical students, interviewing them before, during, and after their psychiatric clerkship.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Prior to clerkships, students perceived psychiatric patients to be dangerous, fragile, hard to treat, and to exert a disproportionate emotional toll on clinicians. Stigma was reinforced by safety measures including the provision of alarms, but this improved following “real life” engagement with patients. Students experienced little emotional distress from clinical contacts, particularly those where they led the consultation. Pre-existing beliefs about mental illness being hard to “fix” showed less change over time. Although uncommon, when staff referred to patients using pejorative language, students emulated these negative attitudes.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Among medical students, direct patient contact plays an important role in counteracting pre-existing negative attitudes towards mental illness. This can be facilitated by supportive supervisors, clinical teams allocating students a clear practical role, involving patients in teaching, and roleplay to alleviate potential concerns about seeing patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7069,"journal":{"name":"Academic Psychiatry","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-024-02035-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study sought to understand whether perceptions of mental illness change during the course of students’ psychiatry clerkships, and what facilitates such change.

Methods

Using a longitudinal qualitative study design, the authors followed up 14 medical students, interviewing them before, during, and after their psychiatric clerkship.

Results

Prior to clerkships, students perceived psychiatric patients to be dangerous, fragile, hard to treat, and to exert a disproportionate emotional toll on clinicians. Stigma was reinforced by safety measures including the provision of alarms, but this improved following “real life” engagement with patients. Students experienced little emotional distress from clinical contacts, particularly those where they led the consultation. Pre-existing beliefs about mental illness being hard to “fix” showed less change over time. Although uncommon, when staff referred to patients using pejorative language, students emulated these negative attitudes.

Conclusions

Among medical students, direct patient contact plays an important role in counteracting pre-existing negative attitudes towards mental illness. This can be facilitated by supportive supervisors, clinical teams allocating students a clear practical role, involving patients in teaching, and roleplay to alleviate potential concerns about seeing patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过精神病学临床实习改变医学生对精神疾病的看法:纵向定性研究
结果在实习之前,学生们认为精神病患者是危险的、脆弱的、难以治疗的,而且会对临床医生造成极大的情感伤害。包括提供警报器在内的安全措施强化了耻辱感,但在与病人 "真实接触 "后,这种耻辱感有所改善。学生在临床接触中,尤其是在他们主导咨询的情况下,几乎没有受到情绪上的困扰。关于精神疾病难以 "治愈 "的原有观念随着时间的推移变化较小。结论在医科学生中,直接接触病人在抵消先前存在的对精神疾病的负面态度方面发挥着重要作用。这可以通过支持性导师、临床团队为学生分配明确的实际角色、让患者参与教学以及角色扮演来减轻学生对看病的潜在担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
157
期刊介绍: Academic Psychiatry is the international journal of the American Association of Chairs of Departments of Psychiatry, American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training, Association for Academic Psychiatry, and Association of Directors of Medical Student Education in Psychiatry. Academic Psychiatry publishes original, scholarly work in psychiatry and the behavioral sciences that focuses on innovative education, academic leadership, and advocacy. The scope of the journal includes work that furthers knowledge and stimulates evidence-based advances in academic psychiatry in the following domains: education and training, leadership and administration, career and professional development, ethics and professionalism, and health and well-being.
期刊最新文献
Implementing an Interactive Self-screening Psychological Distress Tool for Residents and Fellows. Moral Distress, Hope, and the Carceral Experience. The Need for Artificial Intelligence Literacy in Psychiatry Residency Training. Opportunities and Barriers of Generative Artificial Intelligence in the Training of Psychiatrists: A Competencies-Based Perspective. Evaluation of an Interprofessional Educational Intervention in Mental Health and Intellectual and Developmental Disability for Health and Social Service Trainees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1