A Study on the Design of Incentive Contracts for Platform Economy Regulation Based on Dual Principal–Agents

IF 2.3 4区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Systems Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.3390/systems12090343
Ruibi Zhang, Jinhe Zhu, Ming Lei
{"title":"A Study on the Design of Incentive Contracts for Platform Economy Regulation Based on Dual Principal–Agents","authors":"Ruibi Zhang, Jinhe Zhu, Ming Lei","doi":"10.3390/systems12090343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A system of incentives can be established to encourage several parties to unite as a community of interest and become jointly committed to the platform economic governance. The platform economy involves progressively more complex subjects of interest and relationships, which are not the typical principal–agent one-time cooperative relationship. This study investigates the problem of regulatory incentives in the platform economy, specifically focusing on the relationship between the government, platform enterprises, and merchants. It analyzes this issue under conditions of asymmetric information by constructing and solving a dual principal–agent model. The findings indicate the following: (1) the government’s incentives and regulatory mechanisms can be considered as interchangeable to some extent, with decisions made by evaluating their respective costs; (2) the government’s optimal incentives and regulations ultimately shape the self-regulatory behavior of merchants through platform enterprises; and (3) the optimal level of incentives for both the government and the platform enterprise is influenced by factors such as the ability coefficient, the social transformation coefficient, and the merchants’ reliance on the platform enterprise. Additionally, the optimal effort level of the platform enterprise and the merchants increases with higher levels of the regulatory effort, risk sensitivity coefficient, and ability coefficient. A win–win scenario and a long-term, stable cooperative partnership can be reached by the three parties under the ideal incentive intensity. The study’s conclusions can serve as a theoretical foundation and support for the creation of incentive contracts for platform economy regulation.","PeriodicalId":36394,"journal":{"name":"Systems","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systems","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12090343","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A system of incentives can be established to encourage several parties to unite as a community of interest and become jointly committed to the platform economic governance. The platform economy involves progressively more complex subjects of interest and relationships, which are not the typical principal–agent one-time cooperative relationship. This study investigates the problem of regulatory incentives in the platform economy, specifically focusing on the relationship between the government, platform enterprises, and merchants. It analyzes this issue under conditions of asymmetric information by constructing and solving a dual principal–agent model. The findings indicate the following: (1) the government’s incentives and regulatory mechanisms can be considered as interchangeable to some extent, with decisions made by evaluating their respective costs; (2) the government’s optimal incentives and regulations ultimately shape the self-regulatory behavior of merchants through platform enterprises; and (3) the optimal level of incentives for both the government and the platform enterprise is influenced by factors such as the ability coefficient, the social transformation coefficient, and the merchants’ reliance on the platform enterprise. Additionally, the optimal effort level of the platform enterprise and the merchants increases with higher levels of the regulatory effort, risk sensitivity coefficient, and ability coefficient. A win–win scenario and a long-term, stable cooperative partnership can be reached by the three parties under the ideal incentive intensity. The study’s conclusions can serve as a theoretical foundation and support for the creation of incentive contracts for platform economy regulation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于双委托代理的平台经济监管激励合同设计研究
可以建立激励制度,鼓励多方联合成为利益共同体,共同致力于平台经济治理。平台经济涉及的利益主体和关系逐渐复杂,不是典型的委托代理一次性合作关系。本研究探讨平台经济中的监管激励问题,特别关注政府、平台企业和商家之间的关系。它通过构建和求解一个双委托代理模型,分析了信息不对称条件下的这一问题。研究结果表明(1)政府的激励机制和监管机制在一定程度上可以相互替代,通过评估各自的成本做出决策;(2)政府的最优激励机制和监管机制最终通过平台企业形成商家的自律行为;(3)政府和平台企业的最优激励水平受能力系数、社会转型系数以及商家对平台企业的依赖程度等因素的影响。此外,监管力度、风险敏感系数和能力系数越高,平台企业和商户的最佳努力程度也越高。在理想的激励强度下,三方可以实现共赢,建立长期稳定的合作伙伴关系。研究结论可为平台经济监管激励契约的建立提供理论基础和支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Systems
Systems Decision Sciences-Information Systems and Management
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
204
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Study of the Main Mathematical Models Used in Mobility, Storage, Pickup and Delivery in Urban Logistics: A Systematic Review One-Bit In, Two-Bit Out: Network-Based Metrics of Papers Can Be Largely Improved by Including Only the External Citation Counts without the Citation Relations Nash–Cournot Equilibrium and Its Impact on Network Transmission Congestion Integrating System Perspectives to Optimize Ecosystem Service Provision in Urban Ecological Development The Influence of Machine Learning on Enhancing Rational Decision-Making and Trust Levels in e-Government
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1