Green innovation for a sustainable environment: Modeling the new green knowledge production function for OECD countries

IF 3.5 4区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Natural Resources Forum Pub Date : 2024-08-26 DOI:10.1111/1477-8947.12552
Ferhat Özbay
{"title":"Green innovation for a sustainable environment: Modeling the new green knowledge production function for OECD countries","authors":"Ferhat Özbay","doi":"10.1111/1477-8947.12552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The world community faces serious challenges such as climate change, biological loss, and environmental degradation. Developing ecological technologies is vital for coping with these unreversible crises. This study proposed a modified green knowledge production function to achieve sustainable development goals and generate policies for promoting environmental technologies. It examined the impact of market demands, environmental research and development expenditures, human capital, and environmental protection policies on the production of green environment technologies. Panel data included 16 OECD countries from 1990 to 2019. Data analysis strategies included the Gengenbach, Urbain, and Westerlund panel co‐integration test, fully modified least squares, mean group dynamic least squares, and estimators such as feasible generalized least squares and panel‐corrected standard errors for robust checks. A novel panel causality test via a half‐panel jackknife estimator was also applied for causality analyses. The findings showed that human capital, market size, and environmental policy stringency played significant roles in producing environmental technologies and innovations. Although environmental expenditures made by the government positively affected the supply of green innovation, no statistically significant results were observed. The study highlights the importance of enhancing environmental innovation factors by promoting policies, including human capital development, environmental sanctions, and market demands for a sustainable environment.","PeriodicalId":49777,"journal":{"name":"Natural Resources Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Resources Forum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12552","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The world community faces serious challenges such as climate change, biological loss, and environmental degradation. Developing ecological technologies is vital for coping with these unreversible crises. This study proposed a modified green knowledge production function to achieve sustainable development goals and generate policies for promoting environmental technologies. It examined the impact of market demands, environmental research and development expenditures, human capital, and environmental protection policies on the production of green environment technologies. Panel data included 16 OECD countries from 1990 to 2019. Data analysis strategies included the Gengenbach, Urbain, and Westerlund panel co‐integration test, fully modified least squares, mean group dynamic least squares, and estimators such as feasible generalized least squares and panel‐corrected standard errors for robust checks. A novel panel causality test via a half‐panel jackknife estimator was also applied for causality analyses. The findings showed that human capital, market size, and environmental policy stringency played significant roles in producing environmental technologies and innovations. Although environmental expenditures made by the government positively affected the supply of green innovation, no statistically significant results were observed. The study highlights the importance of enhancing environmental innovation factors by promoting policies, including human capital development, environmental sanctions, and market demands for a sustainable environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
促进可持续环境的绿色创新:经合组织国家新的绿色知识生产函数建模
国际社会面临着气候变化、生物损失和环境退化等严峻挑战。发展生态技术对于应对这些不可逆转的危机至关重要。本研究提出了一个修正的绿色知识生产函数,以实现可持续发展目标,并制定促进环境技术的政策。研究考察了市场需求、环境研发支出、人力资本和环境保护政策对绿色环境技术生产的影响。面板数据包括 1990 年至 2019 年的 16 个经合组织国家。数据分析策略包括 Gengenbach、Urbain 和 Westerlund 面板协整检验、完全修正最小二乘法、均值组动态最小二乘法,以及用于稳健性检验的可行广义最小二乘法和面板校正标准误差等估计方法。在因果关系分析中,还采用了一种新的面板因果关系检验方法,即半面板杰克刀估计器。研究结果表明,人力资本、市场规模和环境政策的严格程度在产生环境技术和创新方面发挥了重要作用。虽然政府的环保支出对绿色创新的供给产生了积极影响,但在统计上没有发现显著结果。这项研究强调了通过促进政策(包括人力资本发展、环境制裁和可持续环境的市场需求)来增强环境创新因素的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Natural Resources Forum
Natural Resources Forum 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Natural Resources Forum, a United Nations Sustainable Development Journal, focuses on international, multidisciplinary issues related to sustainable development, with an emphasis on developing countries. The journal seeks to address gaps in current knowledge and stimulate policy discussions on the most critical issues associated with the sustainable development agenda, by promoting research that integrates the social, economic, and environmental dimensions of sustainable development. Contributions that inform the global policy debate through pragmatic lessons learned from experience at the local, national, and global levels are encouraged. The Journal considers articles written on all topics relevant to sustainable development. In addition, it dedicates series, issues and special sections to specific themes that are relevant to the current discussions of the United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD). Articles must be based on original research and must be relevant to policy-making. Criteria for selection of submitted articles include: 1) Relevance and importance of the topic discussed to sustainable development in general, both in terms of policy impacts and gaps in current knowledge being addressed by the article; 2) Treatment of the topic that incorporates social, economic and environmental aspects of sustainable development, rather than focusing purely on sectoral and/or technical aspects; 3) Articles must contain original applied material drawn from concrete projects, policy implementation, or literature reviews; purely theoretical papers are not entertained.
期刊最新文献
Trade dependence and cultural distance: An analysis of economic interactions and humanistic exchanges between China and ASEAN countries Can energy intensity, clean energy utilization, economic expansion, and financial development contribute to ecological progress in Iceland? A quantile‐on‐quantile KRLS analysis The nexus of foreign aid, institutional quality, and climate‐related financial policies: Evidence from the global database Impact of foreign direct investment on methane emissions in agriculture: An empirical evidence based on Sub‐Saharan Africa Sustainable development goals, sustainable finance, and financial inclusion: An awareness perspective of business graduates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1