Patterns of hair pulling in trichotillomania: An ecological momentary assessment study

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100910
{"title":"Patterns of hair pulling in trichotillomania: An ecological momentary assessment study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Trichotillomania (TTM) research lacks an ecologically valid phenomenological description despite increasing research efforts. Previous studies primarily rely on retrospective cross-sectional data, emphasizing the need for longitudinal high-frequency assessments to capture the variability of hair pulling.</p><p>The objective of this study was to describe hair pulling patterns and episode characteristics by means of ecological momentary assessment (EMA), and to compare those parameters between focused and automatic episodes.</p><p>Study procedures included an online screening, a diagnostic interview via telephone, a comprehensive self-report questionnaire and a 10-day EMA-protocol (7 EMAs/day).</p><p>Data from 61 individuals who met diagnostic criteria for TTM (age: <em>M</em> = 29.3, <em>SD</em> = 7.47; 92% female) were analyzed (3948 EMAs; 1217 episodes). Participants reported a mean number of 2.00 (<em>SD</em> = 2.31; range: 0–4.9) episodes per day. One third did not report any days without episodes. Hair pulling showed a relatively even distribution throughout the day. Most prominent triggers were tension and visual/tactile cues. The latter were more relevant in focused episodes, whereas “habit/routine” scored higher in automatic episodes.</p><p>The results suggest that hair pulling occurs not sporadic but is rather present in daily life. Using real-time data from a clinical sample, the study enhances our comprehension of the phenomenology of TTM which may ultimately advance TTM research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221136492400054X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trichotillomania (TTM) research lacks an ecologically valid phenomenological description despite increasing research efforts. Previous studies primarily rely on retrospective cross-sectional data, emphasizing the need for longitudinal high-frequency assessments to capture the variability of hair pulling.

The objective of this study was to describe hair pulling patterns and episode characteristics by means of ecological momentary assessment (EMA), and to compare those parameters between focused and automatic episodes.

Study procedures included an online screening, a diagnostic interview via telephone, a comprehensive self-report questionnaire and a 10-day EMA-protocol (7 EMAs/day).

Data from 61 individuals who met diagnostic criteria for TTM (age: M = 29.3, SD = 7.47; 92% female) were analyzed (3948 EMAs; 1217 episodes). Participants reported a mean number of 2.00 (SD = 2.31; range: 0–4.9) episodes per day. One third did not report any days without episodes. Hair pulling showed a relatively even distribution throughout the day. Most prominent triggers were tension and visual/tactile cues. The latter were more relevant in focused episodes, whereas “habit/routine” scored higher in automatic episodes.

The results suggest that hair pulling occurs not sporadic but is rather present in daily life. Using real-time data from a clinical sample, the study enhances our comprehension of the phenomenology of TTM which may ultimately advance TTM research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拔毛症患者的拔毛模式:生态学瞬间评估研究
尽管研究力度不断加大,但对嗜毛症(TTM)的研究却缺乏生态学上有效的现象描述。本研究的目的是通过生态瞬间评估(EMA)来描述拔毛模式和发作特征,并比较集中发作和自动发作的参数。研究程序包括在线筛查、电话诊断访谈、综合自我报告问卷和为期 10 天的 EMA 方案(每天 7 次 EMA)。研究分析了 61 名符合 TTM 诊断标准的患者(年龄:M = 29.3,SD = 7.47;92% 为女性)的数据(3948 次 EMA;1217 次发作)。参与者报告的平均发作次数为每天 2.00 次(SD = 2.31;范围:0-4.9)。有三分之一的人没有报告过任何一天没有发作。拔毛现象在一天中的分布相对均匀。最主要的诱因是紧张和视觉/触觉暗示。结果表明,拔毛现象并非偶发,而是存在于日常生活中。这项研究利用临床样本的实时数据,加深了我们对 TTM 现象的理解,最终可能会推动 TTM 研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
46
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders (JOCRD) is an international journal that publishes high quality research and clinically-oriented articles dealing with all aspects of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and related conditions (OC spectrum disorders; e.g., trichotillomania, hoarding, body dysmorphic disorder). The journal invites studies of clinical and non-clinical (i.e., student) samples of all age groups from the fields of psychiatry, psychology, neuroscience, and other medical and health sciences. The journal''s broad focus encompasses classification, assessment, psychological and psychiatric treatment, prevention, psychopathology, neurobiology and genetics. Clinical reports (descriptions of innovative treatment methods) and book reviews on all aspects of OCD-related disorders will be considered, as will theoretical and review articles that make valuable contributions. Suitable topics for manuscripts include: -The boundaries of OCD and relationships with OC spectrum disorders -Validation of assessments of obsessive-compulsive and related phenomena -OCD symptoms in diverse social and cultural contexts -Studies of neurobiological and genetic factors in OCD and related conditions -Experimental and descriptive psychopathology and epidemiological studies -Studies on relationships among cognitive and behavioral variables in OCD and related disorders -Interpersonal aspects of OCD and related disorders -Evaluation of psychological and psychiatric treatment and prevention programs, and predictors of outcome.
期刊最新文献
Group metacognitive therapy for pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder: A pilot study The scientific status of safety behaviors in body dysmorphic disorder Patterns of hair pulling in trichotillomania: An ecological momentary assessment study Assessing factors of adherence and efficacy: A randomized controlled trial of a fully automated self-help A-EBT website Efficacy and feasibility of web-based ACT-Enhanced behavioral treatment for skin picking in adults: A randomized waitlist-controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1