Yuxin Yang, Xuan Xiong, Xiaofei Wang, Qionglan Dong, Lingai Pan
{"title":"Prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia by metal-coated endotracheal tubes: a meta-analysis","authors":"Yuxin Yang, Xuan Xiong, Xiaofei Wang, Qionglan Dong, Lingai Pan","doi":"10.1186/s13054-024-05095-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to evaluate whether endotracheal tubes (ETTs) with a metal coating reduce the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) compared to uncoated ETTs. An extensive literature review was conducted to find studies that compared metal-coated ETT with uncoated ETT across four databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The search parameters were set from the inception of each database until June 2024. The primary outcome measures were the rates of VAP and hospital mortality. Two independent researchers carried out the literature selection, data extraction, and quality evaluation. Data analysis was performed with RevMan 5.4.1. Furthermore, a Deeks funnel plot was used to evaluate potential publication bias in the studies included. Following the screening process, five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) encompassing a total of 2157 patients were identified. In terms of the primary outcome, the VAP incidence was found to be lower in the group utilizing metal-coated ETT compared to those with uncoated ETT, demonstrating a statistically significant difference [RR = 0.71, 95% CI (0.54–0.95), P = 0.02]. No notable difference in mortality rates was observed between the two groups [RR = 1.05, 95% CI (0.86–1.27), P = 0.65]. Concerning secondary outcomes, two studies were evaluated to compare the mechanical ventilation duration (RR = 0.60, 95% CI (− 0.52, 1.72), P = 0.29, I2 = 97%) and intensive care unit (ICU) stay for both patient groups (RR = 0.47, 95% CI (− 1.02, 1.95), P = 0.54, I2 = 50%). Due to the marked heterogeneity, a comparison of mechanical ventilation length between the two patient groups was not feasible. However, both studies suggested no significant difference in ventilation duration between patients using metal-coated ETT and those with uncoated ETT. Metal-coated ETT show a lower occurrence of VAP compared to the uncoated ETT. Nevertheless, they do not considerably decrease the length of mechanical ventilation, the duration of ICU admission, nor do they reduce hospital mortality rates. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ , identifier CRD42024560618.","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"329 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05095-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate whether endotracheal tubes (ETTs) with a metal coating reduce the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) compared to uncoated ETTs. An extensive literature review was conducted to find studies that compared metal-coated ETT with uncoated ETT across four databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The search parameters were set from the inception of each database until June 2024. The primary outcome measures were the rates of VAP and hospital mortality. Two independent researchers carried out the literature selection, data extraction, and quality evaluation. Data analysis was performed with RevMan 5.4.1. Furthermore, a Deeks funnel plot was used to evaluate potential publication bias in the studies included. Following the screening process, five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) encompassing a total of 2157 patients were identified. In terms of the primary outcome, the VAP incidence was found to be lower in the group utilizing metal-coated ETT compared to those with uncoated ETT, demonstrating a statistically significant difference [RR = 0.71, 95% CI (0.54–0.95), P = 0.02]. No notable difference in mortality rates was observed between the two groups [RR = 1.05, 95% CI (0.86–1.27), P = 0.65]. Concerning secondary outcomes, two studies were evaluated to compare the mechanical ventilation duration (RR = 0.60, 95% CI (− 0.52, 1.72), P = 0.29, I2 = 97%) and intensive care unit (ICU) stay for both patient groups (RR = 0.47, 95% CI (− 1.02, 1.95), P = 0.54, I2 = 50%). Due to the marked heterogeneity, a comparison of mechanical ventilation length between the two patient groups was not feasible. However, both studies suggested no significant difference in ventilation duration between patients using metal-coated ETT and those with uncoated ETT. Metal-coated ETT show a lower occurrence of VAP compared to the uncoated ETT. Nevertheless, they do not considerably decrease the length of mechanical ventilation, the duration of ICU admission, nor do they reduce hospital mortality rates. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ , identifier CRD42024560618.
本研究旨在评估与无涂层气管插管(ETT)相比,有金属涂层的气管插管(ETT)是否能降低呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的发病率。我们进行了广泛的文献综述,在四个数据库中找到了比较金属涂层 ETT 和无涂层 ETT 的研究:PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library 和 Web of Science。搜索参数设置从每个数据库建立之初到 2024 年 6 月。主要结果指标为 VAP 发生率和住院死亡率。两名独立研究人员进行了文献筛选、数据提取和质量评估。数据分析使用 RevMan 5.4.1 进行。此外,还使用 Deeks 漏斗图评估了纳入研究中潜在的发表偏倚。经过筛选,确定了五项随机对照试验(RCT),共涉及 2157 名患者。在主要结果方面,使用金属涂层 ETT 组的 VAP 发生率低于使用无涂层 ETT 组,差异具有统计学意义[RR = 0.71,95% CI (0.54-0.95),P = 0.02]。两组死亡率无明显差异[RR = 1.05,95% CI (0.86-1.27),P = 0.65]。关于次要结果,对两项研究进行了评估,以比较两组患者的机械通气持续时间(RR = 0.60,95% CI (- 0.52, 1.72),P = 0.29,I2 = 97%)和重症监护室(ICU)停留时间(RR = 0.47,95% CI (- 1.02, 1.95),P = 0.54,I2 = 50%)。由于存在明显的异质性,因此无法对两组患者的机械通气时间进行比较。不过,两项研究均表明,使用金属涂层 ETT 的患者与使用无涂层 ETT 的患者在通气时间上没有明显差异。与无涂层 ETT 相比,金属涂层 ETT 的 VAP 发生率较低。尽管如此,金属涂层 ETT 并没有显著缩短机械通气时间和重症监护病房的住院时间,也没有降低住院死亡率。系统综述注册:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ ,标识符为 CRD42024560618。
期刊介绍:
Critical Care is an esteemed international medical journal that undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to maintain its high quality standards. Its primary objective is to enhance the healthcare services offered to critically ill patients. To achieve this, the journal focuses on gathering, exchanging, disseminating, and endorsing evidence-based information that is highly relevant to intensivists. By doing so, Critical Care seeks to provide a thorough and inclusive examination of the intensive care field.