Medical Assistance in Dying in Quebec: A Continuum Between Teams' Accountability and Interdisciplinary Support Groups' Assumption of Responsibility.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH International Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2024-08-29 DOI:10.3389/ijph.2024.1607407
Catherine Perron,Eric Racine,Marie-Eve Bouthillier
{"title":"Medical Assistance in Dying in Quebec: A Continuum Between Teams' Accountability and Interdisciplinary Support Groups' Assumption of Responsibility.","authors":"Catherine Perron,Eric Racine,Marie-Eve Bouthillier","doi":"10.3389/ijph.2024.1607407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives\r\nIn the province of Quebec, Canada, interdisciplinary support groups (ISGs) are mandated to support those who are involved in the clinical, administrative, legal and ethical aspects of medical assistance in dying (MAiD). This article presents the results of a mixed-method, multi-phase study carried out in 2021 on ISGs with the aim to describe current ISG practices, critically analyze them and make recommendations on promising practices for provincial implementation.\r\n\r\nMethod\r\nSemi-structured interviews (42) and focus groups (7) with coordinators of 24 ISGs were used to identify promising practices and confirm their utility with participants.\r\n\r\nResults\r\nWe have distributed the ISGs along what we coined an \"ISG continuum.\" Between teams' accountability (decentralization) and ISGs' assumption of responsibility for MAiD requests (centralization), a middle ground approach, focused on the value of support, should be favored.\r\n\r\nConclusion\r\nThe structuring of ISGs and their practices is intimately linked to their values. Harmonization of ISGs and their practices, while considering their specific values and contexts, can contribute to the equity and quality of services intended for those who request MAiD and those who support them.","PeriodicalId":14322,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2024.1607407","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives In the province of Quebec, Canada, interdisciplinary support groups (ISGs) are mandated to support those who are involved in the clinical, administrative, legal and ethical aspects of medical assistance in dying (MAiD). This article presents the results of a mixed-method, multi-phase study carried out in 2021 on ISGs with the aim to describe current ISG practices, critically analyze them and make recommendations on promising practices for provincial implementation. Method Semi-structured interviews (42) and focus groups (7) with coordinators of 24 ISGs were used to identify promising practices and confirm their utility with participants. Results We have distributed the ISGs along what we coined an "ISG continuum." Between teams' accountability (decentralization) and ISGs' assumption of responsibility for MAiD requests (centralization), a middle ground approach, focused on the value of support, should be favored. Conclusion The structuring of ISGs and their practices is intimately linked to their values. Harmonization of ISGs and their practices, while considering their specific values and contexts, can contribute to the equity and quality of services intended for those who request MAiD and those who support them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
魁北克的临终医疗援助:团队问责制与跨学科支持小组责任承担之间的连续性。
目的在加拿大魁北克省,跨学科支持小组(ISGs)的任务是为参与临终医疗协助(MAiD)的临床、行政、法律和伦理方面的人员提供支持。本文介绍了 2021 年针对跨学科支持小组开展的一项多阶段混合方法研究的结果,目的是描述跨学科支持小组的现行做法,对其进行批判性分析,并就有前途的做法提出建议,以供各省实施。方法对 24 个跨学科支持小组的协调员进行了半结构式访谈(42 次),并开展了焦点小组(7 次),以确定有前途的做法,并向参与者确认这些做法的实用性。在小组负责制(权力下放)和综合服务小组对千年发展目标申请负责制(权力集中)之间,我们倾向于采用一种以支持价值为重点的中间方法。协调 ISG 及其做法,同时考虑到其具体的价值观和背景,有助于提高为申请千年发展目标评估的人和支持他们的人提供的服务的公平性和质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Public Health
International Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
269
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Public Health publishes scientific articles relevant to global public health, from different countries and cultures, and assembles them into issues that raise awareness and understanding of public health problems and solutions. The Journal welcomes submissions of original research, critical and relevant reviews, methodological papers and manuscripts that emphasize theoretical content. IJPH sometimes publishes commentaries and opinions. Special issues highlight key areas of current research. The Editorial Board''s mission is to provide a thoughtful forum for contemporary issues and challenges in global public health research and practice.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Evaluation of the Antibiotic Resistance Profile of Staphylococcus aureus Isolated From Breeders and Livestock. Comparison of Causes of Mortality Between Hospitalized Unsheltered Homeless Patients and Non-Homeless Sex and Age-Matched Controls: A Retrospective Case-Control Study. Determinants of Utilization of Antenatal Care Services Among Women of Childbearing Age in Jigawa State, Nigeria. An Improved Air Health Index Based on Short-Term Cardiovascular Effects in Tianjin, China. Global Burden of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Among Children and Adolescents: A Comprehensive Analysis (1990-2019).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1