Analysis of assisted reproductive outcomes in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia and early‐stage endometrial cancer after fertility‐sparing treatment

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics Pub Date : 2024-09-15 DOI:10.1002/ijgo.15898
Jiaheng Li, Mengnuo Li, Yijiang Li, Xianling Zhao, Yichun Guan, Xiaoqiong Yuan, Shanshan Du, Caihua Zhang, Wenxia Liu, Bingnan Ren
{"title":"Analysis of assisted reproductive outcomes in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia and early‐stage endometrial cancer after fertility‐sparing treatment","authors":"Jiaheng Li, Mengnuo Li, Yijiang Li, Xianling Zhao, Yichun Guan, Xiaoqiong Yuan, Shanshan Du, Caihua Zhang, Wenxia Liu, Bingnan Ren","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.15898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveTo explore the assisted reproductive outcomes of patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) and early‐stage endometrial cancer (EEC) who achieved complete remission after conservative treatment and to provide reference for clinical selection of appropriate conservative treatment.MethodThis retrospective cohort study included seven patients with EEC and 62 patients with AEH who underwent in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection at the Reproductive Center of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between August 2015 and October 2023. The authors divided the participants into two groups based on the type of fertility‐sparing treatment received: the oral medication group and the levonorgestrel‐releasing intrauterine system (LNG‐IUS) group. The primary outcome was the cumulative clinical pregnancy rate. Secondary outcomes included clinical pregnancy rate per transfer cycle, embryo utilization rate, and high‐quality embryo rate.ResultsThe LNG‐IUS group had a significantly higher rate of usable embryos compared with the oral medication group (80.8% vs 91.1%, <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.005) and also had a thinner endometrial thickness on the day of embryo transfer. The cumulative clinical pregnancy rate was higher in the LNG‐IUS group compared with the medication group (46.7% vs 78.9%, <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.037), and the difference was statistically significant.ConclusionFor patients with AEH and EEC with fertility needs, the conservative treatment method of LNG‐IUS can achieve better assisted reproductive outcomes.","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15898","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveTo explore the assisted reproductive outcomes of patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) and early‐stage endometrial cancer (EEC) who achieved complete remission after conservative treatment and to provide reference for clinical selection of appropriate conservative treatment.MethodThis retrospective cohort study included seven patients with EEC and 62 patients with AEH who underwent in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection at the Reproductive Center of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between August 2015 and October 2023. The authors divided the participants into two groups based on the type of fertility‐sparing treatment received: the oral medication group and the levonorgestrel‐releasing intrauterine system (LNG‐IUS) group. The primary outcome was the cumulative clinical pregnancy rate. Secondary outcomes included clinical pregnancy rate per transfer cycle, embryo utilization rate, and high‐quality embryo rate.ResultsThe LNG‐IUS group had a significantly higher rate of usable embryos compared with the oral medication group (80.8% vs 91.1%, P = 0.005) and also had a thinner endometrial thickness on the day of embryo transfer. The cumulative clinical pregnancy rate was higher in the LNG‐IUS group compared with the medication group (46.7% vs 78.9%, P = 0.037), and the difference was statistically significant.ConclusionFor patients with AEH and EEC with fertility needs, the conservative treatment method of LNG‐IUS can achieve better assisted reproductive outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非典型子宫内膜增生和早期子宫内膜癌患者接受保胎治疗后的辅助生殖效果分析
目的 探讨经保守治疗后病情完全缓解的非典型子宫内膜增生症(AEH)和早期子宫内膜癌(EEC)患者的辅助生殖效果,为临床选择合适的保守治疗方法提供参考。方法这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2015年8月至2023年10月期间在郑州大学第三附属医院生殖中心接受体外受精或卵胞浆内单精子注射的7例EEC患者和62例AEH患者。作者根据接受的保胎治疗类型将参与者分为两组:口服药物组和左炔诺孕酮释放宫内系统(LNG-IUS)组。主要结果是累积临床妊娠率。结果与口服药物组相比,LNG-IUS 组的可用胚胎率明显更高(80.8% vs 91.1%,P = 0.005),胚胎移植当天的子宫内膜厚度也更薄。LNG-IUS 组的累积临床妊娠率高于药物组(46.7% vs 78.9%,P = 0.037),差异有统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
期刊最新文献
Routine ultrasound does not improve instrument placement at operative vaginal delivery: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Beyond borders: The global impact of violating reproductive human rights. Trustworthiness criteria for meta-analyses of randomized controlled studies: OBGYN Journal guidelines. Menstrual management using the etonogestrel implant in individuals with intellectual disabilities in Joinville, Brazil. Anticoagulant therapy in pregnant women with mechanical and bioprosthetic heart valves.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1