Diagnostic Value of Artificial Intelligence in Minimal Breast Lesions Based on Real-Time Dynamic Ultrasound Imaging

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL International Journal of General Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI:10.2147/ijgm.s479969
Chen Qu, Fei Xia, Ling Chen, Hong-Jian Li, Wei-Min Li
{"title":"Diagnostic Value of Artificial Intelligence in Minimal Breast Lesions Based on Real-Time Dynamic Ultrasound Imaging","authors":"Chen Qu, Fei Xia, Ling Chen, Hong-Jian Li, Wei-Min Li","doi":"10.2147/ijgm.s479969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Purpose:</strong> : To explore the diagnostic value of artificial intelligence (AI)-based on real-time dynamic ultrasound imaging system for minimal breast lesions.<br/><strong>Patients and Methods:</strong> Minimal breast lesions with a maximum diameter of ≤ 10mm were selected in this prospective study. The ultrasound equipment and AI system were activated Simultaneously. The ultrasound imaging video is connected to the server of AI system to achieve simultaneous output of AI and ultrasound scanning. Dynamic observation of breast lesions was conducted via ultrasound. And these lesions were evaluated and graded according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification system through deep learning (DL) algorithms in AI. Surgical pathology was taken as the gold standard, and ROC curves were drawn to determine the area under the curve (AUC) and the optimal threshold values of BI-RADS. The diagnostic efficacy was compared with the use of a BI-RADS category &gt; 3 as the threshold for clinically intervening in diagnosing minimal breast cancers.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> 291 minimal breast lesions were enrolled in the study, of which 228 were benign (78.35%) and 63 were malignant (21.65%). The AUC of the ROC curve was 0.833, with the best threshold value &gt; 4A. When using &gt;BI-RADS 3 and &gt;BI-RADS 4A as threshold values, the sensitivity and negative predictive value for minimal breast cancers were higher for &gt;BI-RADS 3 than &gt;BI-RADS 4A (100% vs 65.08%, 100% vs 89.91%, P values &lt; 0.001). However, the corresponding specificity, positive predictive value, and accuracy were lower than those for &gt;BI-RADS 4A (42.11% vs 85.96%, 32.31% vs 56.16%, and 54.64% vs 81.44%, P values &lt; 0.001).<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> The AI-based real-time dynamic ultrasound imaging system shows good capacity in diagnosing minimal breast lesions, which is helpful for early diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer, and improves the prognosis of patients. However, it still results in some missed diagnoses and misdiagnoses of minimal breast cancers.<br/><br/><strong>Keywords:</strong> Breast cancer, ultrasound, artificial intelligence, diagnostic<br/>","PeriodicalId":14131,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of General Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of General Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/ijgm.s479969","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: : To explore the diagnostic value of artificial intelligence (AI)-based on real-time dynamic ultrasound imaging system for minimal breast lesions.
Patients and Methods: Minimal breast lesions with a maximum diameter of ≤ 10mm were selected in this prospective study. The ultrasound equipment and AI system were activated Simultaneously. The ultrasound imaging video is connected to the server of AI system to achieve simultaneous output of AI and ultrasound scanning. Dynamic observation of breast lesions was conducted via ultrasound. And these lesions were evaluated and graded according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification system through deep learning (DL) algorithms in AI. Surgical pathology was taken as the gold standard, and ROC curves were drawn to determine the area under the curve (AUC) and the optimal threshold values of BI-RADS. The diagnostic efficacy was compared with the use of a BI-RADS category > 3 as the threshold for clinically intervening in diagnosing minimal breast cancers.
Results: 291 minimal breast lesions were enrolled in the study, of which 228 were benign (78.35%) and 63 were malignant (21.65%). The AUC of the ROC curve was 0.833, with the best threshold value > 4A. When using >BI-RADS 3 and >BI-RADS 4A as threshold values, the sensitivity and negative predictive value for minimal breast cancers were higher for >BI-RADS 3 than >BI-RADS 4A (100% vs 65.08%, 100% vs 89.91%, P values < 0.001). However, the corresponding specificity, positive predictive value, and accuracy were lower than those for >BI-RADS 4A (42.11% vs 85.96%, 32.31% vs 56.16%, and 54.64% vs 81.44%, P values < 0.001).
Conclusion: The AI-based real-time dynamic ultrasound imaging system shows good capacity in diagnosing minimal breast lesions, which is helpful for early diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer, and improves the prognosis of patients. However, it still results in some missed diagnoses and misdiagnoses of minimal breast cancers.

Keywords: Breast cancer, ultrasound, artificial intelligence, diagnostic
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于实时动态超声波成像的人工智能对乳腺微小病变的诊断价值
目的: :探索基于人工智能(AI)的实时动态超声成像系统对乳腺微小病变的诊断价值:这项前瞻性研究选择了最大直径≤ 10 毫米的乳腺微小病变。同时启动超声设备和人工智能系统。超声成像视频连接至人工智能系统服务器,实现人工智能和超声扫描同步输出。通过超声波对乳腺病变进行动态观察。通过人工智能中的深度学习(DL)算法,根据乳腺成像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)的分类系统对这些病变进行评估和分级。以手术病理为金标准,绘制 ROC 曲线以确定曲线下面积(AUC)和 BI-RADS 的最佳阈值。结果:研究共纳入 291 例乳腺微小病变,其中良性病变 228 例(78.35%),恶性病变 63 例(21.65%)。ROC曲线的AUC为0.833,最佳阈值为4A。以 BI-RADS 3 和 BI-RADS 4A 作为阈值时,BI-RADS 3 对极小乳腺癌的灵敏度和阴性预测值均高于 BI-RADS 4A(100% vs 65.08%,100% vs 89.91%,P 值为 0.001)。然而,相应的特异性、阳性预测值和准确性却低于 BI-RADS 4A(42.11% vs 85.96%、32.31% vs 56.16%、54.64% vs 81.44%,P 值为 0.001):基于人工智能的实时动态超声成像系统对乳腺微小病变具有良好的诊断能力,有助于乳腺癌的早期诊断和治疗,改善患者的预后。然而,该系统仍会导致一些极小乳腺癌的漏诊和误诊:乳腺癌 超声波 人工智能 诊断
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of General Medicine
International Journal of General Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1113
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of General Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on general and internal medicine, pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment protocols. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research and clinical studies across all disease areas. A key focus of the journal is the elucidation of disease processes and management protocols resulting in improved outcomes for the patient. Patient perspectives such as satisfaction, quality of life, health literacy and communication and their role in developing new healthcare programs and optimizing clinical outcomes are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, the International Journal of General Medicine will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Diagnostic Significance of Combined Measurement of Lipoprotein(a) and Neck Circumference in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease. Exploring Predictors of Long-Term Care Facility Admissions in Stroke Survivors: Insights from a Taiwanese Hospital-Based Study. Analysis of Characteristics and Prognostic Factors of Full-Frequency Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss with Hyperlipidemia. Helicobacter Pylori Infection as the Predominant High-Risk Factor for Gastric Cancer Recurrence Post-Gastrectomy: An 8-Year Multicenter Retrospective Study. The Role of Nitric Oxide, Lipocalin-2, and Proinflammatory Cytokines on Proteinuria and Insulin Resistance in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Subgroups.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1