Biologics for eosinophilic otitis media: a retrospective case study in a multidisciplinary center

Abstract

Purpose

Eosinophilic otitis media (EOM) is a difficult-to-treat otitis media characterized by eosinophilic accumulation in the middle ear mucosa and effusion. It is refractory to conventional treatments and is strongly associated with asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). The diagnostic criteria for EOM were established by IINO in 2011. With the recognition of type 2 inflammatory diseases, the gold standard of treatment is the systemic and topical administration of corticosteroids. Recently, several retrospective studies have demonstrated the efficacy of biologic treatments in EOM. We aimed to share our experience regarding the response of EOM after the use of biologics.

Methods

This is a retrospective observational analysis including patients with refractory EOM treated with different biologics (benralizumab, omalizumab, mepolizumab, dupilumab) for concomitant severe asthma, urticaria and/or severe uncontrolled CRSwNP from 2011 to 2023. Treatment effectiveness in terms of EOM severity was measured using medical Global Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness (GETE).

Results

We illustrated 4 clinical cases of uncontrolled comorbid EOM and demonstrated the complexity of multidisciplinary medical pathway with good response to biologics. We also observed that response to EOM and CRSwNP does not always follow that of asthma.

Conclusions

The results of our small sample were consistent with those found in the literature and showed control of EOM with biologics. We need a larger multicentric sample and methodology to confirm these results and to compare the efficacy of different biologics.