Peter J. Castagna, Dara E. Babinski, Daniel A. Waschbusch
{"title":"Callous-unemotional traits moderate the association between inhibitory control and disruptive behavior problems","authors":"Peter J. Castagna, Dara E. Babinski, Daniel A. Waschbusch","doi":"10.1007/s00787-024-02582-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The presence of callous-unemotional (CU) traits may not be unique to conduct disorder (CD) but also extend to oppositional defiant disorder (ODD). While a distinct neurocognitive profile characterizes CU traits, it remains unclear whether this CU-related neurocognitive profile differs between youth with CD and ODD. This study investigated whether CU traits moderate the relationship between inhibitory control and CD or ODD symptoms. We leveraged computational modeling to decompose task-based inhibitory control in a sample of 200 children (59.5% boys, 86.5% Caucasian), aged 8 to 15 years (<i>M</i> = 10.10, <i>SD</i> = 1.88), referred to an outpatient child diagnostic clinic focused on externalizing problems. Analyses examined whether CU traits moderated the relationship between inhibitory control and CD or ODD symptoms while controlling for ADHD symptoms and child demographics. The results indicated that the strength of the relationship between inhibitory control and CD and ODD symptoms varies as a function of CU traits. Specifically, CD was linked to a more cautious decision-making style when elevated CU traits were present, whereas ODD was associated with more efficient decision making. These findings suggest distinct neurocognitive profiles based on CU traits, which vary between CD and ODD. Clinically, this underscores the importance of tailoring interventions for CD-CU and ODD-CU, focusing on decision making processes rather than merely addressing impulsivity. This research contributes to a more nuanced understanding of the interaction between neurocognitive processes and disruptive behavior, with significant implications for both theoretical models and treatment approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":11856,"journal":{"name":"European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-024-02582-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The presence of callous-unemotional (CU) traits may not be unique to conduct disorder (CD) but also extend to oppositional defiant disorder (ODD). While a distinct neurocognitive profile characterizes CU traits, it remains unclear whether this CU-related neurocognitive profile differs between youth with CD and ODD. This study investigated whether CU traits moderate the relationship between inhibitory control and CD or ODD symptoms. We leveraged computational modeling to decompose task-based inhibitory control in a sample of 200 children (59.5% boys, 86.5% Caucasian), aged 8 to 15 years (M = 10.10, SD = 1.88), referred to an outpatient child diagnostic clinic focused on externalizing problems. Analyses examined whether CU traits moderated the relationship between inhibitory control and CD or ODD symptoms while controlling for ADHD symptoms and child demographics. The results indicated that the strength of the relationship between inhibitory control and CD and ODD symptoms varies as a function of CU traits. Specifically, CD was linked to a more cautious decision-making style when elevated CU traits were present, whereas ODD was associated with more efficient decision making. These findings suggest distinct neurocognitive profiles based on CU traits, which vary between CD and ODD. Clinically, this underscores the importance of tailoring interventions for CD-CU and ODD-CU, focusing on decision making processes rather than merely addressing impulsivity. This research contributes to a more nuanced understanding of the interaction between neurocognitive processes and disruptive behavior, with significant implications for both theoretical models and treatment approaches.
冷酷无情(CU)特质的存在可能并不是行为障碍(CD)所独有的,它也可能延伸至对立违抗障碍(ODD)。虽然CU特质具有独特的神经认知特征,但这种与CU相关的神经认知特征在CD和ODD青少年之间是否存在差异仍不清楚。本研究调查了CU特质是否会缓和抑制控制与CD或ODD症状之间的关系。我们利用计算模型分解了200名儿童(59.5%为男孩,86.5%为白种人)的任务型抑制控制,这些儿童的年龄在8至15岁之间(中=10.10,标差=1.88),他们被转介到一家专注于外化问题的儿童诊断门诊。在控制多动症症状和儿童人口统计学特征的情况下,研究分析了 CU 特征是否调节了抑制控制与 CD 或 ODD 症状之间的关系。结果表明,抑制控制与 CD 和 ODD 症状之间的关系强度随 CU 特质的变化而变化。具体地说,当CU特质升高时,CD与更谨慎的决策风格有关,而ODD则与更高效的决策有关。这些研究结果表明,基于CU特质的不同神经认知特征在CD和ODD之间存在差异。在临床上,这强调了针对 CD-CU 和 ODD-CU 定制干预措施的重要性,干预措施应侧重于决策过程,而不仅仅是解决冲动问题。这项研究有助于人们更细致地了解神经认知过程与破坏性行为之间的相互作用,对理论模型和治疗方法都具有重要意义。
期刊介绍:
European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry is Europe''s only peer-reviewed journal entirely devoted to child and adolescent psychiatry. It aims to further a broad understanding of psychopathology in children and adolescents. Empirical research is its foundation, and clinical relevance is its hallmark.
European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry welcomes in particular papers covering neuropsychiatry, cognitive neuroscience, genetics, neuroimaging, pharmacology, and related fields of interest. Contributions are encouraged from all around the world.