Mapping health-related quality of life of children and families receiving pediatric invasive home mechanical ventilation: a scoping review protocol

IF 6.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Systematic Reviews Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1186/s13643-024-02658-2
Keisha White Makinde, Maysara Mitchell, Alexandra F. Merz, Michael Youssef
{"title":"Mapping health-related quality of life of children and families receiving pediatric invasive home mechanical ventilation: a scoping review protocol","authors":"Keisha White Makinde, Maysara Mitchell, Alexandra F. Merz, Michael Youssef","doi":"10.1186/s13643-024-02658-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Children utilizing invasive home mechanical ventilation (administered via tracheostomy tube) receive intensive care at home without the support of trained staff typically present in an intensive care unit; within the context of worsening home nursing shortages, much of the 24/7 care burden falls to families which are likely under supported. Prior reviews have explored the quality of life of children receiving various forms of mechanical ventilation, without addressing the impact on the family. Additionally, the literature inconsistently differentiates the unique experience of families with children using invasive home mechanical ventilation from non-invasive, which has lower morbidity and mortality and requires less nursing care in the home. Therefore, our study aims to explore and map the existing literature regarding the impact of invasive home mechanical ventilation on the child and family’s quality of life. Identified gaps will inform future research focused on improving the family quality of life of children with invasive home mechanical ventilation. Five databases will be searched using keywords and controlled vocabulary to identify relevant studies: Ovid Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. English language studies will meet inclusion criteria if they include primary research studies of children or families of children utilizing invasive home mechanical ventilation at home and assess quality of life. Children and young adults aged 0–25 years will be included. We exclude studies of hospitalized children, studies focused solely on healthcare professional experiences or clinical outcomes, and those focused on the period surrounding discharge from admission for tracheostomy placement. Two independent reviewers will screen studies at the title/abstract and full-text levels. Two independent reviewers will extract data from relevant studies. Disagreements will be resolved by an independent third reviewer. A targeted grey literature search will be performed utilizing ProQuest, clinicaltrials.gov, WHO trial registry, Google Scholar, and professional societies. Findings will be presented in tables and figures along with a narrative summary. This scoping review seeks to map the literature and provide a descriptive report of the health-related quality of life of children using invasive home mechanical ventilation and their families. Open Science Framework https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/6GB84 Date of Registration: November 29, 2023.","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02658-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Children utilizing invasive home mechanical ventilation (administered via tracheostomy tube) receive intensive care at home without the support of trained staff typically present in an intensive care unit; within the context of worsening home nursing shortages, much of the 24/7 care burden falls to families which are likely under supported. Prior reviews have explored the quality of life of children receiving various forms of mechanical ventilation, without addressing the impact on the family. Additionally, the literature inconsistently differentiates the unique experience of families with children using invasive home mechanical ventilation from non-invasive, which has lower morbidity and mortality and requires less nursing care in the home. Therefore, our study aims to explore and map the existing literature regarding the impact of invasive home mechanical ventilation on the child and family’s quality of life. Identified gaps will inform future research focused on improving the family quality of life of children with invasive home mechanical ventilation. Five databases will be searched using keywords and controlled vocabulary to identify relevant studies: Ovid Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. English language studies will meet inclusion criteria if they include primary research studies of children or families of children utilizing invasive home mechanical ventilation at home and assess quality of life. Children and young adults aged 0–25 years will be included. We exclude studies of hospitalized children, studies focused solely on healthcare professional experiences or clinical outcomes, and those focused on the period surrounding discharge from admission for tracheostomy placement. Two independent reviewers will screen studies at the title/abstract and full-text levels. Two independent reviewers will extract data from relevant studies. Disagreements will be resolved by an independent third reviewer. A targeted grey literature search will be performed utilizing ProQuest, clinicaltrials.gov, WHO trial registry, Google Scholar, and professional societies. Findings will be presented in tables and figures along with a narrative summary. This scoping review seeks to map the literature and provide a descriptive report of the health-related quality of life of children using invasive home mechanical ventilation and their families. Open Science Framework https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/6GB84 Date of Registration: November 29, 2023.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绘制接受儿科有创家庭机械通气的儿童和家庭的健康相关生活质量图:范围界定审查协议
使用侵入性家庭机械通气(通过气管造口术置管)的患儿在家中接受重症监护,没有重症监护病房中训练有素的医护人员提供支持;在家庭护理人员短缺日益严重的情况下,全天候护理的重担大多落在了家庭身上,而这些家庭很可能得不到足够的支持。之前的综述探讨了接受各种形式机械通气的儿童的生活质量,但没有涉及对家庭的影响。此外,文献对使用有创家庭机械通气和无创家庭机械通气的患儿家庭的独特经历的区分并不一致,无创家庭机械通气的发病率和死亡率较低,需要的家庭护理也较少。因此,我们的研究旨在探索和绘制关于有创家庭机械通气对儿童和家庭生活质量影响的现有文献。所发现的不足将为未来的研究提供参考,这些研究的重点是改善有创家庭机械通气患儿的家庭生活质量。将使用关键词和控制词汇对五个数据库进行检索,以确定相关研究:Ovid Medline、Embase、Scopus 和 Cochrane Library。只要是对在家中使用有创家用机械通气的儿童或其家人进行的初级研究,并对生活质量进行评估的英语研究均符合纳入标准。我们将纳入 0-25 岁的儿童和青少年。我们将排除针对住院儿童的研究、仅关注医护人员经验或临床结果的研究,以及关注因气管造口术入院而出院前后的研究。两名独立审稿人将从标题/摘要和全文两个层面对研究进行筛选。两名独立审稿人将从相关研究中提取数据。如有异议,将由独立的第三位审稿人解决。将利用 ProQuest、clinicaltrials.gov、WHO 试验登记、Google Scholar 和专业学会进行有针对性的灰色文献检索。研究结果将以图表和叙述性摘要的形式呈现。本范围界定综述旨在绘制文献地图,并就使用有创家庭机械通气的儿童及其家人的健康相关生活质量提供描述性报告。开放科学框架 https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/6GB84 注册日期:2023 年 11 月 29 日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
期刊最新文献
Choice of primary healthcare providers among population in urban areas of low- and middle-income countries-a protocol for systematic review of literature. Computer-assisted screening in systematic evidence synthesis requires robust and well-evaluated stopping criteria. Patient-related prognostic factors for function and pain after shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. The psychometric properties of instruments measuring ethical sensitivity in nursing: a systematic review. Barriers and facilitators to enrollment in pediatric clinical trials: an overview of systematic reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1