Expectations about presence enhance the influence of content-specific expectations on low-level orientation judgements

IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Cognition Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105961
Joost Haarsma , Aaron Kaltenmaier , Stephen M. Fleming , Peter Kok
{"title":"Expectations about presence enhance the influence of content-specific expectations on low-level orientation judgements","authors":"Joost Haarsma ,&nbsp;Aaron Kaltenmaier ,&nbsp;Stephen M. Fleming ,&nbsp;Peter Kok","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Will something appear and if so, what will it be? Perceptual expectations can concern both the presence and content of a stimulus. However, it is unclear how these different types of expectations interact with each other in biasing perception. Here, we tested how expectations about stimulus presence and content differently affect perceptual inference. Across separate online discovery (<em>N</em> = 110) and replication samples (<em>N</em> = 218), participants were asked to judge both the presence and content (orientation) of noisy grating stimuli. Crucially, preceding compound cues simultaneously and orthogonally predicted both whether a grating was likely to appear as well as what its orientation would be. Across both samples we found that content cues affected both discrimination and presence judgements directly, namely by biasing the orientation judgements in the expected direction and enhancing confidence in stimulus presence on congruent trials. In contrast, presence cues did not affect discrimination judgements directly. Instead, presence cues influenced discrimination judgements indirectly by enhancing the effect of the orientation cues when expecting a stimulus to be present. This was the case on trials where a stimulus was present, as well as on grating-absent trials. Further, presence cues directly affected confidence in stimulus presence. This suggests that presence expectations may act as a regulatory volume knob for the influence of content expectations. Further, modelling revealed higher sensitivity in distinguishing between grating presence and absence following absence cues than presence cues, demonstrating an asymmetry between gathering evidence in favour of stimulus presence and absence. Finally, evidence for overweighted expectations being associated with hallucination-like perception was inconclusive. In sum, our results provide nuance to popular predictive processing accounts of perception by showing that expectations of presence and content have distinct but interacting roles in shaping conscious perception.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"254 ","pages":"Article 105961"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027724002476","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Will something appear and if so, what will it be? Perceptual expectations can concern both the presence and content of a stimulus. However, it is unclear how these different types of expectations interact with each other in biasing perception. Here, we tested how expectations about stimulus presence and content differently affect perceptual inference. Across separate online discovery (N = 110) and replication samples (N = 218), participants were asked to judge both the presence and content (orientation) of noisy grating stimuli. Crucially, preceding compound cues simultaneously and orthogonally predicted both whether a grating was likely to appear as well as what its orientation would be. Across both samples we found that content cues affected both discrimination and presence judgements directly, namely by biasing the orientation judgements in the expected direction and enhancing confidence in stimulus presence on congruent trials. In contrast, presence cues did not affect discrimination judgements directly. Instead, presence cues influenced discrimination judgements indirectly by enhancing the effect of the orientation cues when expecting a stimulus to be present. This was the case on trials where a stimulus was present, as well as on grating-absent trials. Further, presence cues directly affected confidence in stimulus presence. This suggests that presence expectations may act as a regulatory volume knob for the influence of content expectations. Further, modelling revealed higher sensitivity in distinguishing between grating presence and absence following absence cues than presence cues, demonstrating an asymmetry between gathering evidence in favour of stimulus presence and absence. Finally, evidence for overweighted expectations being associated with hallucination-like perception was inconclusive. In sum, our results provide nuance to popular predictive processing accounts of perception by showing that expectations of presence and content have distinct but interacting roles in shaping conscious perception.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对存在的预期会增强特定内容的预期对低层次定向判断的影响
会不会出现什么东西,如果会,是什么?知觉期望既可能涉及刺激物的存在,也可能涉及刺激物的内容。然而,目前还不清楚这些不同类型的期望在影响知觉方面是如何相互作用的。在这里,我们测试了对刺激存在和内容的预期如何以不同方式影响知觉推断。在独立的在线发现样本(N = 110)和复制样本(N = 218)中,参与者被要求判断噪声光栅刺激的存在和内容(方向)。最重要的是,前面的复合线索同时正交地预测了光栅是否可能出现以及光栅的方向。在这两个样本中,我们发现内容线索会直接影响辨别和出现判断,即通过使方向判断向预期方向偏移,并在一致的试验中增强对刺激出现的信心。相比之下,存在线索并不直接影响辨别判断。相反,当预期刺激物存在时,存在线索会增强方位线索的效果,从而间接影响辨别判断。在刺激物存在的试验和光栅不存在的试验中都是如此。此外,存在线索直接影响了对刺激物存在的信心。这表明,对刺激存在的预期可能会对内容预期的影响起到调节作用。此外,建模显示,在没有光栅提示的情况下,区分光栅存在和不存在的灵敏度要高于存在提示,这表明在收集有利于刺激存在和不存在的证据之间存在不对称。最后,过重的预期与幻觉样知觉相关的证据并不确定。总之,我们的研究结果表明,在形成有意识知觉的过程中,对刺激存在和刺激内容的预期具有截然不同但又相互影响的作用,从而为流行的知觉预测加工理论提供了新的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognition
Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
283
期刊介绍: Cognition is an international journal that publishes theoretical and experimental papers on the study of the mind. It covers a wide variety of subjects concerning all the different aspects of cognition, ranging from biological and experimental studies to formal analysis. Contributions from the fields of psychology, neuroscience, linguistics, computer science, mathematics, ethology and philosophy are welcome in this journal provided that they have some bearing on the functioning of the mind. In addition, the journal serves as a forum for discussion of social and political aspects of cognitive science.
期刊最新文献
The impact of rhythm on visual attention disengagement in newborns and 2-month-old infants Exploring power-law behavior in human gaze shifts across tasks and populations Editorial Board Altercentric bias in preverbal infants' encoding of object kind Rational choices elicit stronger sense of agency in brain and behavior
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1