Attitudes of patients with IVF/ICSI toward human embryo in vitro culture beyond 14 days

IF 3.4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING Regenerative Therapy Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.reth.2024.09.005
Yukitaka Kiya , Saori Watanabe , Kana Harada , Hideki Yui , Yoshimi Yashiro , Kaori Muto
{"title":"Attitudes of patients with IVF/ICSI toward human embryo in vitro culture beyond 14 days","authors":"Yukitaka Kiya ,&nbsp;Saori Watanabe ,&nbsp;Kana Harada ,&nbsp;Hideki Yui ,&nbsp;Yoshimi Yashiro ,&nbsp;Kaori Muto","doi":"10.1016/j.reth.2024.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>When the International Society for Stem Cell Research revised its 2021 guidelines, it reversed its ban on the <em>in vitro</em> culture of human embryos beyond 14 days. However, despite widespread recognition of the importance of public debate on embryo research, it remains unclear how patients who have undergone in vitro fertilization (IVF) and/or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) perceive this change in the guidelines. Three focus group interviews were conducted with IVF/ICSI patients to understand their opinions on extending the in vitro culture of human embryos beyond 14 days. Thematic analysis revealed a primarily favorable attitude toward the extension of in vitro embryo culture, identifying six reasons for this positive perspective. However, two reasons for negative attitudes were identified, along with some concerns that need to be addressed. To facilitate an open discussion, the following suggestions were made to the government and scientific community. The government and scientific community should provide sufficient knowledge to IVF/ICSI patients about research before discussions. It's important to consider diverse views on embryo models, including distrust and resistance. Ensuring IVF/ICSI patients' psychological safety is essential. “Public conversations” with citizens, including IVF/ICSI patients, should be promoted, and their opinions should be considered as part of a broader public spectrum.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20895,"journal":{"name":"Regenerative Therapy","volume":"26 ","pages":"Pages 831-836"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352320424001664/pdfft?md5=cb2954e50dcb6360aac3c414c5ff6288&pid=1-s2.0-S2352320424001664-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regenerative Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352320424001664","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When the International Society for Stem Cell Research revised its 2021 guidelines, it reversed its ban on the in vitro culture of human embryos beyond 14 days. However, despite widespread recognition of the importance of public debate on embryo research, it remains unclear how patients who have undergone in vitro fertilization (IVF) and/or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) perceive this change in the guidelines. Three focus group interviews were conducted with IVF/ICSI patients to understand their opinions on extending the in vitro culture of human embryos beyond 14 days. Thematic analysis revealed a primarily favorable attitude toward the extension of in vitro embryo culture, identifying six reasons for this positive perspective. However, two reasons for negative attitudes were identified, along with some concerns that need to be addressed. To facilitate an open discussion, the following suggestions were made to the government and scientific community. The government and scientific community should provide sufficient knowledge to IVF/ICSI patients about research before discussions. It's important to consider diverse views on embryo models, including distrust and resistance. Ensuring IVF/ICSI patients' psychological safety is essential. “Public conversations” with citizens, including IVF/ICSI patients, should be promoted, and their opinions should be considered as part of a broader public spectrum.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
IVF/ICSI 患者对人类胚胎体外培养超过 14 天的态度
国际干细胞研究学会在修订其 2021 年指导方针时,撤销了对人类胚胎体外培养超过 14 天的禁令。然而,尽管人们普遍认识到就胚胎研究进行公开辩论的重要性,但接受体外受精(IVF)和/或卵胞浆内单精子显微注射(ICSI)的患者如何看待指南中的这一变化仍不清楚。我们对 IVF/ICSI 患者进行了三次焦点小组访谈,以了解他们对将人类胚胎体外培养延长至 14 天以上的看法。主题分析表明,他们对延长体外胚胎培养的时间主要持赞成态度,并为这种积极观点找出了六个原因。不过,也发现了两个持否定态度的原因,以及一些需要解决的问题。为了促进公开讨论,向政府和科学界提出了以下建议。政府和科学界应在讨论前向 IVF/ICSI 患者提供足够的研究知识。必须考虑对胚胎模型的不同看法,包括不信任和抵制。确保 IVF/ICSI 患者的心理安全至关重要。应促进与包括 IVF/ICSI 患者在内的公民进行 "公开对话",并将他们的意见作为更广泛的公众范围的一部分加以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Regenerative Therapy
Regenerative Therapy Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.30%
发文量
106
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Regenerative Therapy is the official peer-reviewed online journal of the Japanese Society for Regenerative Medicine. Regenerative Therapy is a multidisciplinary journal that publishes original articles and reviews of basic research, clinical translation, industrial development, and regulatory issues focusing on stem cell biology, tissue engineering, and regenerative medicine.
期刊最新文献
Approach of design for air mass balance in an aseptic processing area for cell-based products Therapeutic effects of mesenchymal stem cell conditioned media on streptozotocin-induced diabetes in Wistar rats Research of in vivo reprogramming toward clinical applications in regenerative medicine: A concise review A scientometric and visualization analysis of 3D printing scaffolds for vascularized bone tissue engineering over the last decade. Extracellular vesicles originating from the mechanical microenvironment in the pathogenesis and applications for cardiovascular diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1