Linking meta-learning to meta-structure.

IF 16.6 1区心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Behavioral and Brain Sciences Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1017/S0140525X24000232

Malte Schilling, Helge J Ritter, Frank W Ohl

引用次数: 0

Abstract

We propose that a principled understanding of meta-learning, as aimed for by the authors, benefits from linking the focus on learning with an equally strong focus on structure, which means to address the question: What are the meta-structures that can guide meta-learning?

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

将元学习与元结构联系起来。

我们建议，作者所希望的对元学习的原则性理解，得益于将对学习的关注与同样强烈的对结构的关注联系起来，这意味着要解决这样一个问题：能够指导元学习的元结构是什么？能够指导元学习的元结构是什么？

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 医学-行为科学

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

1.70%

发文量

353

期刊介绍： Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) is a highly respected journal that employs an innovative approach called Open Peer Commentary. This format allows for the publication of noteworthy and contentious research from various fields including psychology, neuroscience, behavioral biology, and cognitive science. Each article is accompanied by 20-40 commentaries from experts across these disciplines, as well as a response from the author themselves. This unique setup creates a captivating forum for the exchange of ideas, critical analysis, and the integration of research within the behavioral and brain sciences, spanning topics from molecular neurobiology and artificial intelligence to the philosophy of the mind.

期刊最新文献

Bayes beyond the predictive distribution. Challenges of meta-learning and rational analysis in large worlds. Combining meta-learned models with process models of cognition. Integrative learning in the lens of meta-learned models of cognition: Impacts on animal and human learning outcomes. Is human compositionality meta-learned?