Assessment of Racial, Ethnic, and Sex-Based Disparities in Time-to-Antibiotics and Sepsis Outcomes in a Large Multihospital Cohort.

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000006428
Theodore R Pak, Sarimer M Sánchez, Caroline S McKenna, Chanu Rhee, Michael Klompas
{"title":"Assessment of Racial, Ethnic, and Sex-Based Disparities in Time-to-Antibiotics and Sepsis Outcomes in a Large Multihospital Cohort.","authors":"Theodore R Pak, Sarimer M Sánchez, Caroline S McKenna, Chanu Rhee, Michael Klompas","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To characterize associations between race/ethnicity/sex, time-to-antibiotics, and mortality in patients with suspected sepsis or septic shock.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study, with race/ethnicity/sex as the exposure, and time-to-antibiotics (relative to emergency department arrival) and in-hospital mortality as the outcome.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Five Massachusetts hospitals.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Forty-nine thousand six hundred nine adults admitted 2015-2022 with suspected sepsis or septic shock (blood cultures drawn and IV antibiotics administered within 24 hr of arrival, plus evidence of organ dysfunction for sepsis, and hypotension or lactate ≥ 4.0 mmol/L for septic shock).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Among included patients, 22,598 (46%) were women, 36,626 (75%) were White, and 4,483 (9.2%) were Black. Women had longer median time-to-antibiotics than men when presenting with either suspected sepsis (203 vs. 190 min) or septic shock (160 vs. 142 min). Differences in time-to-antibiotics for women vs. men persisted after adjusting for age, race, comorbidities, source of infection, and severity of illness (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] for 3-6 vs. < 3 hr; 1.16 [95% CI, 1.07-1.25] for sepsis and aOR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.01-1.18] for septic shock). Median time-to-antibiotics was also longer for Black vs. White patients for both sepsis (215 vs. 194 min; aOR for 3-6 vs. < 3 hr; 1.24 [95% CI, 1.06-1.45]) and septic shock (median 159 vs. 148 min; aOR, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.12-1.55]). There was no association between race/ethnicity/sex and in-hospital mortality for sepsis without shock; however, women with septic shock had higher mortality (aOR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.04-1.29) vs. men. Higher mortality for women with septic shock persisted when also adjusting for time-to-antibiotics (aOR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.03-1.32).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a large cohort of patients with sepsis, time-to-antibiotics was longer for both women and Black patients even after detailed risk-adjustment. Women with septic shock had higher adjusted in-hospital mortality than men, but this association was not moderated by time-to-antibiotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006428","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To characterize associations between race/ethnicity/sex, time-to-antibiotics, and mortality in patients with suspected sepsis or septic shock.

Design: Retrospective cohort study, with race/ethnicity/sex as the exposure, and time-to-antibiotics (relative to emergency department arrival) and in-hospital mortality as the outcome.

Setting: Five Massachusetts hospitals.

Patients: Forty-nine thousand six hundred nine adults admitted 2015-2022 with suspected sepsis or septic shock (blood cultures drawn and IV antibiotics administered within 24 hr of arrival, plus evidence of organ dysfunction for sepsis, and hypotension or lactate ≥ 4.0 mmol/L for septic shock).

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: Among included patients, 22,598 (46%) were women, 36,626 (75%) were White, and 4,483 (9.2%) were Black. Women had longer median time-to-antibiotics than men when presenting with either suspected sepsis (203 vs. 190 min) or septic shock (160 vs. 142 min). Differences in time-to-antibiotics for women vs. men persisted after adjusting for age, race, comorbidities, source of infection, and severity of illness (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] for 3-6 vs. < 3 hr; 1.16 [95% CI, 1.07-1.25] for sepsis and aOR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.01-1.18] for septic shock). Median time-to-antibiotics was also longer for Black vs. White patients for both sepsis (215 vs. 194 min; aOR for 3-6 vs. < 3 hr; 1.24 [95% CI, 1.06-1.45]) and septic shock (median 159 vs. 148 min; aOR, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.12-1.55]). There was no association between race/ethnicity/sex and in-hospital mortality for sepsis without shock; however, women with septic shock had higher mortality (aOR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.04-1.29) vs. men. Higher mortality for women with septic shock persisted when also adjusting for time-to-antibiotics (aOR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.03-1.32).

Conclusions: In a large cohort of patients with sepsis, time-to-antibiotics was longer for both women and Black patients even after detailed risk-adjustment. Women with septic shock had higher adjusted in-hospital mortality than men, but this association was not moderated by time-to-antibiotics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估大型多医院队列中抗生素使用时间和败血症结果的种族、人种和性别差异。
目的描述疑似败血症或脓毒性休克患者的种族/民族/性别、使用抗生素的时间与死亡率之间的关系:设计:回顾性队列研究,以种族/民族/性别为暴露对象,以使用抗生素的时间(相对于到达急诊科的时间)和院内死亡率为结果:马萨诸塞州五家医院:2015年至2022年入院的49,699名疑似败血症或脓毒性休克的成人(入院24小时内抽血培养并静脉注射抗生素,败血症患者有器官功能障碍的证据,脓毒性休克患者有低血压或乳酸≥4.0 mmol/L):无:在纳入的患者中,22,598 名(46%)为女性,36,626 名(75%)为白人,4,483 名(9.2%)为黑人。在出现疑似败血症(203 分钟对 190 分钟)或脓毒性休克(160 分钟对 142 分钟)时,女性使用抗生素的中位时间比男性长。在对年龄、种族、合并症、感染源和病情严重程度进行调整后,女性与男性在使用抗生素时间上的差异依然存在(调整后的赔率比 [aOR] 为 3-6 小时 vs. < 3 小时;脓毒症为 1.16 [95% CI, 1.07-1.25],脓毒性休克为 1.09 [95% CI, 1.01-1.18])。在败血症(215 分钟对 194 分钟;3-6 小时对小于 3 小时的 aOR 为 1.24 [95% CI,1.06-1.45])和脓毒性休克(中位 159 分钟对 148 分钟;aOR 为 1.32 [95% CI,1.12-1.55])方面,黑人患者使用抗生素的中位时间也比白人患者长(215 分钟对 194 分钟;3-6 小时对小于 3 小时的 aOR 为 1.24 [95% CI,1.06-1.45])。在无休克的脓毒症患者中,种族/民族/性别与院内死亡率之间没有关联;但是,与男性相比,女性脓毒性休克患者的死亡率更高(aOR,1.16;95% CI,1.04-1.29)。如果同时考虑使用抗生素的时间,女性脓毒性休克患者的死亡率仍然较高(aOR,1.16;95% CI,1.03-1.32):在一个大型脓毒症患者队列中,即使经过详细的风险调整,女性和黑人患者使用抗生素的时间也更长。女性脓毒性休克患者的调整后院内死亡率高于男性,但这种关联并不因使用抗生素的时间而有所缓和。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic Uncertainty Among Critically Ill Children Admitted to the PICU: A Multicenter Study. An International Factorial Vignette-Based Survey of Intubation Decisions in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure. Effect of a Machine Learning-Derived Early Warning Tool With Treatment Protocol on Hypotension During Cardiac Surgery and ICU Stay: The Hypotension Prediction 2 (HYPE-2) Randomized Clinical Trial. Intestinal Drug Absorption After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage and Elective Neurosurgery: Insights From Esomeprazole Pharmacokinetics. Ketamine Versus Etomidate for Rapid Sequence Intubation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1