Reference values for respiratory muscle strength measured with the S-Index Test in well-trained athletes, e-sports athletes and age-matched controls.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY Experimental Physiology Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1113/EP091938
Tomasz Kowalski, Adrian Wilk, Andrzej Klusiewicz, Wojciech Pawliczek, Szczepan Wiecha, Beata Szczepańska, Jadwiga Malczewska-Lenczowska
{"title":"Reference values for respiratory muscle strength measured with the S-Index Test in well-trained athletes, e-sports athletes and age-matched controls.","authors":"Tomasz Kowalski, Adrian Wilk, Andrzej Klusiewicz, Wojciech Pawliczek, Szczepan Wiecha, Beata Szczepańska, Jadwiga Malczewska-Lenczowska","doi":"10.1113/EP091938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Respiratory function assessment is crucial in optimizing athletic performance, safeguarding respiratory health, and ensuring athletes can perform at their peak potential while minimizing the risk of respiratory-related issues. The S-Index Test is a dynamic evaluation of respiratory muscle strength. However, no comprehensive reference values regarding the S-Index Test have been reported yet. A total of 597 participants performed the S-Index Test. They were either well-trained athletes (WTA), or e-sports athletes (ESA), or age-matched controls (AMC) groups. The differences in S-Index Test results between sexes and for group-sex, and performance calibre tier-sex interactions were examined. The relationships between S-Index Test results and age, anthropometric indices and training experience were assessed. Reference values for all the groups were provided. Amongst athletes, the highest values were observed in swimmers and rowers, and the lowest in figure skaters and runners. The S-Index Test results were different for the group-sex interaction (P = 0.004, 151.6 ± 29.0 cmH<sub>2</sub>O for WTA males and 109.8 ± 21.6 cmH<sub>2</sub>O for WTA females, 136.7 ± 28.0 cmH<sub>2</sub>O for ESA males and 101.8 ± 22.0 cmH<sub>2</sub>O for ESA females, 128.7 ± 28.8 cmH<sub>2</sub>O for AMC males and 70.3 ± 24.7 cmH<sub>2</sub>O for AMC females) and higher in males than females (P < 0.001, 145.1 ± 30.5 cmH<sub>2</sub>O for males and 100.8 ± 27.6 cmH<sub>2</sub>O for females). The higher athletic level, presented as performance calibre tier, was not linked to higher respiratory muscle strength in the WTA group (P = 0.094). However, the Bonferroni correction revealed that except for the singular tier in females, there was a significant effect for all the other tiers and sexes (P < 0.001). The obtained results confirm that regardless of the level of physical activity, the anthropometric features are positively linked with respiratory muscle strength. Furthermore, age and training experience were positively correlated with the S-Index Test results in the WTA group.</p>","PeriodicalId":12092,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1113/EP091938","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Respiratory function assessment is crucial in optimizing athletic performance, safeguarding respiratory health, and ensuring athletes can perform at their peak potential while minimizing the risk of respiratory-related issues. The S-Index Test is a dynamic evaluation of respiratory muscle strength. However, no comprehensive reference values regarding the S-Index Test have been reported yet. A total of 597 participants performed the S-Index Test. They were either well-trained athletes (WTA), or e-sports athletes (ESA), or age-matched controls (AMC) groups. The differences in S-Index Test results between sexes and for group-sex, and performance calibre tier-sex interactions were examined. The relationships between S-Index Test results and age, anthropometric indices and training experience were assessed. Reference values for all the groups were provided. Amongst athletes, the highest values were observed in swimmers and rowers, and the lowest in figure skaters and runners. The S-Index Test results were different for the group-sex interaction (P = 0.004, 151.6 ± 29.0 cmH2O for WTA males and 109.8 ± 21.6 cmH2O for WTA females, 136.7 ± 28.0 cmH2O for ESA males and 101.8 ± 22.0 cmH2O for ESA females, 128.7 ± 28.8 cmH2O for AMC males and 70.3 ± 24.7 cmH2O for AMC females) and higher in males than females (P < 0.001, 145.1 ± 30.5 cmH2O for males and 100.8 ± 27.6 cmH2O for females). The higher athletic level, presented as performance calibre tier, was not linked to higher respiratory muscle strength in the WTA group (P = 0.094). However, the Bonferroni correction revealed that except for the singular tier in females, there was a significant effect for all the other tiers and sexes (P < 0.001). The obtained results confirm that regardless of the level of physical activity, the anthropometric features are positively linked with respiratory muscle strength. Furthermore, age and training experience were positively correlated with the S-Index Test results in the WTA group.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在训练有素的运动员、电子竞技运动员和年龄匹配的对照组中使用 S 指数测试测量呼吸肌力量的参考值。
呼吸功能评估对于优化运动表现、保护呼吸健康、确保运动员发挥出最佳潜能,同时最大限度地降低呼吸相关问题的风险至关重要。S-Index 测试是对呼吸肌力量的动态评估。然而,目前还没有关于 S-Index 测试综合参考值的报告。共有 597 名参与者进行了 S-Index 测试。他们或是训练有素的运动员(WTA),或是电子竞技运动员(ESA),或是年龄匹配的对照组(AMC)。研究考察了不同性别间 S-Index 测试结果的差异、组别与性别间的差异以及成绩等级与性别间的交互作用。还评估了 S-Index 测试结果与年龄、人体测量指数和训练经验之间的关系。提供了所有组别的参考值。在运动员中,游泳和赛艇运动员的数值最高,花样滑冰和跑步运动员的数值最低。S-Index 测试结果在组别-性别交互作用中存在差异(P = 0.004,WTA 男性为 151.6 ± 29.0 cmH2O,WTA 女性为 109.8 ± 21.6 cmH2O;ESA 男性为 136.7 ± 28.0 cmH2O,ESA 女性为 101.8 ± 22.0 cmH2O)。男性高于女性(男性为 P 2O,女性为 100.8 ± 27.6 cmH2O)。在 WTA 组中,较高的运动水平(以成绩等级表示)与较高的呼吸肌强度无关(P = 0.094)。然而,Bonferroni 校正显示,除了女性的单一级别外,其他级别和性别都有显著影响(P = 0.094)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Experimental Physiology
Experimental Physiology 医学-生理学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
262
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Experimental Physiology publishes research papers that report novel insights into homeostatic and adaptive responses in health, as well as those that further our understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms in disease. We encourage papers that embrace the journal’s orientation of translation and integration, including studies of the adaptive responses to exercise, acute and chronic environmental stressors, growth and aging, and diseases where integrative homeostatic mechanisms play a key role in the response to and evolution of the disease process. Examples of such diseases include hypertension, heart failure, hypoxic lung disease, endocrine and neurological disorders. We are also keen to publish research that has a translational aspect or clinical application. Comparative physiology work that can be applied to aid the understanding human physiology is also encouraged. Manuscripts that report the use of bioinformatic, genomic, molecular, proteomic and cellular techniques to provide novel insights into integrative physiological and pathophysiological mechanisms are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Iliac branch endoprosthesis for endovascular treatment of complex aorto-iliac aneurysms - from device design to practical experience: how to translate physiology considerations into clinical applications. Impaired glucose tolerance and insulin resistance in a prenatally-androgenized rat model of polycystic ovary syndrome in later life. The effect of female breast surface area on cutaneous thermal sensation, wetness perception and epidermal properties. Unveiling the role of melatonin-related gene CSNK1D in osteoclastogenesis and its implications for osteoporosis treatment. My journey from an early researcher to an aspiring medic: A dance from bench to bedside.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1