Chloramphenicol versus ceftriaxone for the treatment of pneumonia and sepsis in elderly patients with advanced dementia and functional disability. A propensity-weighted retrospective cohort study.

Abstract

Background: Sepsis and pneumonia in the elderly comprise a significant portion of medical admissions. Chloramphenicol has been used in Israel for treatment of bacterial infections, without evidence regarding its efficacy and safety.

Objectives: We aimed to examine whether chloramphenicol was associated with similar outcomes to ceftriaxone, for treatment of sepsis and pneumonia in the elderly with dementia and functional disability.

Methods: Patients over 75, with dementia and functional disability, admitted to the internal medicine ward at Beilinson Hospital between 2011 and 2021, with community-acquired aspiration pneumonia or sepsis of undetermined source were included. Patients with mild dementia and independent in their activities of daily living were excluded. Primary outcome was 30- and 90-day all-cause mortality. A propensity-weighted multivariable model was constructed using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Results were expressed as OR with 95% CI.

Results: In total, 1558 patients were included: 512 treated with chloramphenicol and 1046 with ceftriaxone. The cohort consisted of elderly patients (mean age 87 ± 6.2 years) with comorbidities; 30- and 90-day all-cause mortality were similar [222/512 (43.3%) versus 439/1046 (41.9%) P = 0.602, and 261/512 (50.9%) versus 556/1046 (53.1%) P = 0.419, respectively]. Propensity-weighted, logistic multivariable analysis for 30- and 90-day all-cause mortality revealed similar mortality rates for chloramphenicol and ceftriaxone (OR 1.049 95% CI 0.217-1.158, OR 0.923 95% CI 0.734-1.112, respectively).

Conclusion: In this retrospective cohort of elderly debilitated patients hospitalized with pneumonia and sepsis, we found no difference in 30- and 90-day mortality between those treated with chloramphenicol or ceftriaxone. Further studies should determine the efficacy and safety of chloramphenicol in this population.