The predictive value of transvaginal cervical length and cervical angle ultrasonography in term delivery outcomes: a cohort study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1080/14767058.2024.2406344
Ghazal Tajeran, Roya Derakhshan, Fatemeh Jayervand, Maryam Rahimi, Parisa Hajari, Neda Hashemi
{"title":"The predictive value of transvaginal cervical length and cervical angle ultrasonography in term delivery outcomes: a cohort study.","authors":"Ghazal Tajeran, Roya Derakhshan, Fatemeh Jayervand, Maryam Rahimi, Parisa Hajari, Neda Hashemi","doi":"10.1080/14767058.2024.2406344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Various techniques have been proposed to predict and evaluate the timing and conditions of childbirth in pregnant women at different stages of pregnancy. Providing precise methods for forecasting childbirth status can reduce the burden on the healthcare system. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of transvaginal sonography of cervical length (CL) and cervical angle (CA) on full-term delivery outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cohort study analyzed 151 pregnant women between 37 and 42 weeks of gestational age who were treated at Rasoul Akram Hospital affiliated with Iran University of Medical Sciences from June 2023 to January 2024. All Participants received transvaginal examinations. This study evaluated the accuracy of CL and CA by transvaginal sonography in predicting outcomes like vaginal delivery, cesarean section, necessity for labor induction, and the rate of Premature Rupture of Membranes (PROM). The study used the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve to determine the optimal cutoff for predicting birth outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the pregnant women was 28.9 ± 4.22 years, while the average duration of pregnancy was 39.8 ± 2.11 weeks. Cesarean delivery was performed on 45 individuals (29.8%) and 106 (70.1%) underwent vaginal delivery. The mean CL overall stood at 21.2 ± 6.4 mm. PROM was observed in 41 cases (27.1%) among full-term pregnancies. A significant difference was noted in mean CL between the cesarean and vaginal delivery groups (24.2 ± 2.4 vs. 20.1 ± 2.1 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.001). The predictive value of a CL measuring 21 mm for cesarean delivery was 72.2% sensitive and 79.1% specific. Similarly, a CL of 22 mm showed 66.6% sensitivity and 80.2% specificity for labor induction. Regarding PROM in full-term pregnancies, a CL assessment demonstrated 59.8% sensitivity and 69.1% specificity. Finally, a CA of 115.2° exhibited 70.3% sensitivity and 78.4% specificity in predicting vaginal delivery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study showed that evaluating CL and CA via transvaginal sonography demonstrated adequate diagnostic accuracy in predicting spontaneous birth, need for labor induction, cesarean delivery, and incidence of PROM in full-term pregnant women. This method is suggested to be an accurate and appropriate way to predict delivery results.</p>","PeriodicalId":50146,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","volume":"37 1","pages":"2406344"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2024.2406344","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Various techniques have been proposed to predict and evaluate the timing and conditions of childbirth in pregnant women at different stages of pregnancy. Providing precise methods for forecasting childbirth status can reduce the burden on the healthcare system. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of transvaginal sonography of cervical length (CL) and cervical angle (CA) on full-term delivery outcomes.

Methods: This cohort study analyzed 151 pregnant women between 37 and 42 weeks of gestational age who were treated at Rasoul Akram Hospital affiliated with Iran University of Medical Sciences from June 2023 to January 2024. All Participants received transvaginal examinations. This study evaluated the accuracy of CL and CA by transvaginal sonography in predicting outcomes like vaginal delivery, cesarean section, necessity for labor induction, and the rate of Premature Rupture of Membranes (PROM). The study used the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve to determine the optimal cutoff for predicting birth outcomes.

Results: The mean age of the pregnant women was 28.9 ± 4.22 years, while the average duration of pregnancy was 39.8 ± 2.11 weeks. Cesarean delivery was performed on 45 individuals (29.8%) and 106 (70.1%) underwent vaginal delivery. The mean CL overall stood at 21.2 ± 6.4 mm. PROM was observed in 41 cases (27.1%) among full-term pregnancies. A significant difference was noted in mean CL between the cesarean and vaginal delivery groups (24.2 ± 2.4 vs. 20.1 ± 2.1 mm, p = 0.001). The predictive value of a CL measuring 21 mm for cesarean delivery was 72.2% sensitive and 79.1% specific. Similarly, a CL of 22 mm showed 66.6% sensitivity and 80.2% specificity for labor induction. Regarding PROM in full-term pregnancies, a CL assessment demonstrated 59.8% sensitivity and 69.1% specificity. Finally, a CA of 115.2° exhibited 70.3% sensitivity and 78.4% specificity in predicting vaginal delivery.

Conclusion: The present study showed that evaluating CL and CA via transvaginal sonography demonstrated adequate diagnostic accuracy in predicting spontaneous birth, need for labor induction, cesarean delivery, and incidence of PROM in full-term pregnant women. This method is suggested to be an accurate and appropriate way to predict delivery results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经阴道宫颈长度和宫颈角超声波检查对足月分娩结果的预测价值:一项队列研究。
背景:人们提出了各种技术来预测和评估孕妇在不同孕期的分娩时间和条件。提供预测分娩状况的精确方法可减轻医疗系统的负担。本研究旨在评估经阴道超声检查宫颈长度(CL)和宫颈角度(CA)对足月分娩结果的预测价值:这项队列研究分析了 2023 年 6 月至 2024 年 1 月期间在伊朗医科大学附属拉苏尔-阿克拉姆医院接受治疗的 151 名孕龄介于 37 周和 42 周之间的孕妇。所有参与者均接受了经阴道检查。本研究评估了经阴道超声检查的 CL 和 CA 在预测阴道分娩、剖宫产、引产必要性和胎膜早破(PROM)率等结果方面的准确性。研究采用接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)来确定预测分娩结果的最佳临界值:孕妇的平均年龄为(28.9±4.22)岁,平均怀孕时间为(39.8±2.11)周。45人(29.8%)进行了剖宫产,106人(70.1%)进行了阴道分娩。平均CL值为(21.2 ± 6.4)毫米。在足月妊娠中,有 41 例(27.1%)观察到 PROM。剖宫产组和阴道分娩组的平均CL有明显差异(24.2 ± 2.4 vs. 20.1 ± 2.1 mm,p = 0.001)。21毫米的CL对剖宫产的预测价值为72.2%的敏感性和79.1%的特异性。同样,22 毫米的 CL 对引产的敏感性为 66.6%,特异性为 80.2%。关于足月妊娠的 PROM,CL 评估的敏感性为 59.8%,特异性为 69.1%。最后,CA 115.2°在预测阴道分娩方面的敏感性为 70.3%,特异性为 78.4%:本研究表明,通过经阴道超声波检查评估CL和CA,在预测足月孕妇的自然分娩、引产需求、剖宫产和PROM发生率方面具有足够的诊断准确性。这种方法被认为是预测分娩结果的准确而恰当的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The official journal of The European Association of Perinatal Medicine, The Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies and The International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. The journal publishes a wide range of peer-reviewed research on the obstetric, medical, genetic, mental health and surgical complications of pregnancy and their effects on the mother, fetus and neonate. Research on audit, evaluation and clinical care in maternal-fetal and perinatal medicine is also featured.
期刊最新文献
Meta-analysis of the efficacy of different blue light therapy methods for neonatal jaundice. A meta-analysis of metformin and insulin on maternal outcome and neonatal outcome in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus. Outcomes in low-risk patients before and after an institutional policy offering 39-week elective induction of labor. Serotype distribution, antimicrobial resistance, and molecular characterization of group B Streptococcus isolates from Chinese pregnant woman. Accuracy of transcutaneous bilirubinometry in term infants after phototherapy: a prospective observational study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1