A study on physicians' knowledge and practices of asthma management in Angola.

IF 2 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.5826/mrm.2024.968
Nsiku Lutete, Margarete Arrais, Jorge M R Gama, Luis Taborda-Barata
{"title":"A study on physicians' knowledge and practices of asthma management in Angola.","authors":"Nsiku Lutete, Margarete Arrais, Jorge M R Gama, Luis Taborda-Barata","doi":"10.5826/mrm.2024.968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Asthma is the most common chronic non-communicable disease in children and one of the most common in adults, and the majority of asthma-related deaths are attributed to middle- and low-income countries. Physicians' knowledge and practice have been recognized as fundamental elements in the approach to the asthmatic patient with an impact on the treatment and control of the disease. This study aimed to assess the knowledge and practice of Angolan physicians in the management of asthma, as well as to identify the main gaps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>It was a cross-sectional study carried out in Angola. The data were collected through an online questionnaire to assess the knowledge about asthma among the physicians and the Physicians Practice Assessment Questionnaire. Categorical variables were described with frequencies and percentages. All associations between good practice and possible predictors were established with logistic regression analysis. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 204 physicians throughout Angola participated; the majority of whom were female, aged -between 31 and 40, and from the Luanda province. The average percentage of correct answers for all domains was 65.8% (±SD11.1%). The lowest percentages were in the answers about the diagnosis, drugs, and the signs of an asthma attack. Out of the 204 participants, 81.9% of physicians confirmed seeing patients with asthma. The average percentage of them who reported practicing asthma management based on recommended guidelines was 59.8% (±SD27.8%). More than half of the physicians did not achieve that percentage. The lowest percentages of correct answers concerned assessment of the inhaler technique, provision of a written referral for asthma education, and use of the GINA guidelines to assess the patient's asthma control. Concerning the predictors of best practices, our results showed that being a physician of older age and with more work experience, as well as having the category of specialist were significant predictors of adherence to recommended practices for asthma management.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The physicians' level of knowledge about asthma was moderate, but there are important practical gaps in asthma management regarding standard guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":51135,"journal":{"name":"Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11414511/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5826/mrm.2024.968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Asthma is the most common chronic non-communicable disease in children and one of the most common in adults, and the majority of asthma-related deaths are attributed to middle- and low-income countries. Physicians' knowledge and practice have been recognized as fundamental elements in the approach to the asthmatic patient with an impact on the treatment and control of the disease. This study aimed to assess the knowledge and practice of Angolan physicians in the management of asthma, as well as to identify the main gaps.

Methods: It was a cross-sectional study carried out in Angola. The data were collected through an online questionnaire to assess the knowledge about asthma among the physicians and the Physicians Practice Assessment Questionnaire. Categorical variables were described with frequencies and percentages. All associations between good practice and possible predictors were established with logistic regression analysis. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: A total of 204 physicians throughout Angola participated; the majority of whom were female, aged -between 31 and 40, and from the Luanda province. The average percentage of correct answers for all domains was 65.8% (±SD11.1%). The lowest percentages were in the answers about the diagnosis, drugs, and the signs of an asthma attack. Out of the 204 participants, 81.9% of physicians confirmed seeing patients with asthma. The average percentage of them who reported practicing asthma management based on recommended guidelines was 59.8% (±SD27.8%). More than half of the physicians did not achieve that percentage. The lowest percentages of correct answers concerned assessment of the inhaler technique, provision of a written referral for asthma education, and use of the GINA guidelines to assess the patient's asthma control. Concerning the predictors of best practices, our results showed that being a physician of older age and with more work experience, as well as having the category of specialist were significant predictors of adherence to recommended practices for asthma management.

Conclusions: The physicians' level of knowledge about asthma was moderate, but there are important practical gaps in asthma management regarding standard guidelines.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于安哥拉医生对哮喘管理的认识和实践的研究。
背景:哮喘是儿童最常见的慢性非传染性疾病,也是成人最常见的疾病之一,大多数与哮喘有关的死亡病例发生在中等收入和低收入国家。医生的知识和实践被认为是治疗哮喘患者的基本要素,对疾病的治疗和控制具有重要影响。本研究旨在评估安哥拉医生在哮喘治疗方面的知识和实践,并找出主要差距:这是一项在安哥拉进行的横断面研究。数据通过在线问卷调查和医生实践评估问卷调查收集,以评估医生对哮喘的了解程度。分类变量以频率和百分比进行描述。通过逻辑回归分析确定了良好实践与可能的预测因素之间的所有关联。结果安哥拉全国共有204名医生参加了调查,其中大多数为女性,年龄在31至40岁之间,来自罗安达省。所有领域的平均正确率为65.8%(±SD11.1%)。正确率最低的是关于诊断、药物和哮喘发作征兆的答案。在 204 名参与者中,81.9% 的医生确认曾接诊过哮喘患者。其中根据推荐指南进行哮喘管理的平均比例为 59.8%(±SD27.8%)。超过一半的医生没有达到这一比例。正确答案的最低百分比涉及吸入器技术评估、提供哮喘教育书面转介以及使用 GINA 指南评估患者的哮喘控制情况。关于最佳实践的预测因素,我们的研究结果表明,年龄较大、工作经验较丰富以及拥有专科医生类别的医生是坚持哮喘管理推荐实践的重要预测因素:结论:医生对哮喘的了解程度尚可,但在哮喘管理的标准指南方面还存在很大的实际差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine is the official journal of the Italian Respiratory Society - Società Italiana di Pneumologia (IRS/SIP). The journal publishes on all aspects of respiratory medicine and related fields, with a particular focus on interdisciplinary and translational research. The interdisciplinary nature of the journal provides a unique opportunity for researchers, clinicians and healthcare professionals across specialties to collaborate and exchange information. The journal provides a high visibility platform for the publication and dissemination of top quality original scientific articles, reviews and important position papers documenting clinical and experimental advances.
期刊最新文献
Indoor air bacterial quality and associated factors in prison inmate cells of East Hararghe Zone and Harari Regional State, Eastern Ethiopia. Gorham-Stout disease and multiple cervical lymphangiomas: case report. The association between smoking/vaping habits and self-reported respiratory symptoms. Clinical utility of bedside Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the diagnosis of pneumonia in elderly patients: Comparison with clinical, -radiological and ultrasound diagnosis. An Italian Delphi Consensus on the Triple inhalation Therapy in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1