[Effects of working time recording from the perspective of surgeons].

Ralf Kramer, Swen Günther, Ilker Yasin Eyüpoglu, Tareq Juratli, Witold Polanski
{"title":"[Effects of working time recording from the perspective of surgeons].","authors":"Ralf Kramer, Swen Günther, Ilker Yasin Eyüpoglu, Tareq Juratli, Witold Polanski","doi":"10.1007/s00104-024-02154-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since 2023 the law in Germany has required that working times are recorded in the field of surgery.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The consequences of recording of the working hours in surgery are the main topic of this study. The search for ways of harmonization in the team to counteract a limited availability of personnel requires knowledge of the position of surgeons on the issue in question.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study design is based on the situational approach of organizational research and encompasses 20 qualitative interviews and 186 datasets of an online questionnaire with 24 questions. For the evaluation group comparisons were carried out using the ANOVA analysis. The target groups were surgeons working in German hospitals. The study has an explorative character due to the targeted selection of samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of the online survey showed a strong support for working time recording among surgeons with a general agreement of 82% and a consensus at all levels from residents to medical directors. Less than 50% of the assistants and medical specialists saw an improvement via an in-house dialogue, in comparison to senior physicians and medical directors. The right to compensatory time off by other employees represents a greater burden for senior physicians and chief physicians.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The decisive result shows that there is a preference for transponder-based systems, especially among surgeons with long working hours. The problems of transparency and the right to compensatory time off, often associated with a lack of personnel, demonstrate the necessity for an improved communication and strategic personnel planning in hospitals. Surgeons have differentiated views on the transparent exchange on the topic of the working hours performed.</p>","PeriodicalId":72588,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-024-02154-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Since 2023 the law in Germany has required that working times are recorded in the field of surgery.

Objectives: The consequences of recording of the working hours in surgery are the main topic of this study. The search for ways of harmonization in the team to counteract a limited availability of personnel requires knowledge of the position of surgeons on the issue in question.

Material and methods: The study design is based on the situational approach of organizational research and encompasses 20 qualitative interviews and 186 datasets of an online questionnaire with 24 questions. For the evaluation group comparisons were carried out using the ANOVA analysis. The target groups were surgeons working in German hospitals. The study has an explorative character due to the targeted selection of samples.

Results: The results of the online survey showed a strong support for working time recording among surgeons with a general agreement of 82% and a consensus at all levels from residents to medical directors. Less than 50% of the assistants and medical specialists saw an improvement via an in-house dialogue, in comparison to senior physicians and medical directors. The right to compensatory time off by other employees represents a greater burden for senior physicians and chief physicians.

Discussion: The decisive result shows that there is a preference for transponder-based systems, especially among surgeons with long working hours. The problems of transparency and the right to compensatory time off, often associated with a lack of personnel, demonstrate the necessity for an improved communication and strategic personnel planning in hospitals. Surgeons have differentiated views on the transparent exchange on the topic of the working hours performed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[从外科医生的角度看工作时间记录的影响]。
背景:自 2023 年起,德国法律要求记录外科领域的工作时间:本研究的主题是记录外科工作时间的后果。要在团队中寻找协调方法,以应对人员有限的情况,就必须了解外科医生对相关问题的立场:研究设计以组织研究的情境法为基础,包括 20 个定性访谈和 186 个包含 24 个问题的在线问卷数据集。为了进行评估,使用方差分析进行了分组比较。目标群体是在德国医院工作的外科医生。由于有针对性地选择了样本,因此本研究具有探索性:在线调查结果显示,外科医生对工作时间记录的支持率高达 82%,而且从住院医生到医务主任等各个级别的人员都达成了共识。与资深医生和医务主任相比,只有不到 50%的助理医生和医学专家认为通过内部对话可以得到改善。其他员工的补休权对资深医师和主任医师来说是更大的负担:讨论:决定性的结果表明,人们更倾向于使用基于应答器的系统,尤其是工作时间较长的外科医生。透明度和补休权问题往往与人员缺乏有关,这表明医院有必要加强沟通并制定战略性人事规划。外科医生对工作时间的透明交流有不同的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Klinische Studien. S2k-Leitlinie „Behandlung thermischer Verletzungen im Kindesalter“. [Trauma-associated vascular injuries and the vascular surgical/interventional options for vascular reconstruction]. ["Surgical foresight: beyond the routine" : The challenge of complex visceral surgical emergencies for young medical specialists and senior physicians]. [Conversion to outpatient treatment beyond the hybrid DRG-A view abroad].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1