Rare anatomical variants encountered during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in low resource conditions and the convenient concept of the safe zone of dissection: a prospective observational study at a single center.

Muad Gamil M Haidar, Nuha Ahmed H Sharaf, Suha Abdullah Saleh, Prashant Upadhyay
{"title":"Rare anatomical variants encountered during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in low resource conditions and the convenient concept of the safe zone of dissection: a prospective observational study at a single center.","authors":"Muad Gamil M Haidar, Nuha Ahmed H Sharaf, Suha Abdullah Saleh, Prashant Upadhyay","doi":"10.7602/jmis.2024.27.3.156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The severity of surrounding adhesions, anomalous anatomy, and technical issues are the main factors that complicate cholecystectomy. This study focused on determining the types and frequency of laparoscopic anatomical variations found during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in our limited-resources condition and on defining the safe zone of dissection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study was conducted at a single center in Aden, Yemen from 2012 to 2019. A total of 375 patients, comprising 355 females (94.7%) and 20 males (5.3%), presented with symptomatic gallbladders and underwent standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The regional laparoscopic variations were evaluated and recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 375 patients, 26 (6.9%) had laparoscopic anatomical variations, of whom 19 (73.1%) had vascular variations and seven (26.9%) had ductal variations. The anatomical variations included the following: double cystic artery of separated origin, seven cases (26.9%); Moynihan's hump, six (23.1%); double cystic artery of single origin, four (15.4%); thin long cystic duct, four (15.4%); subvesical duct, three (11.5%); and cystic artery hocking the cystic duct, two (7.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Biliary anatomical variations can be expected in any dissected zone. Most of the detected variants were associated with the cystic artery. An overlooked accessory cysto-biliary communication can cause complicated biliary leakage. A surgeon's skills and knowledge of laparoscopic anatomical variants are essential for performing a safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":73832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11416893/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2024.27.3.156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The severity of surrounding adhesions, anomalous anatomy, and technical issues are the main factors that complicate cholecystectomy. This study focused on determining the types and frequency of laparoscopic anatomical variations found during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in our limited-resources condition and on defining the safe zone of dissection.

Methods: This prospective study was conducted at a single center in Aden, Yemen from 2012 to 2019. A total of 375 patients, comprising 355 females (94.7%) and 20 males (5.3%), presented with symptomatic gallbladders and underwent standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The regional laparoscopic variations were evaluated and recorded.

Results: Of the 375 patients, 26 (6.9%) had laparoscopic anatomical variations, of whom 19 (73.1%) had vascular variations and seven (26.9%) had ductal variations. The anatomical variations included the following: double cystic artery of separated origin, seven cases (26.9%); Moynihan's hump, six (23.1%); double cystic artery of single origin, four (15.4%); thin long cystic duct, four (15.4%); subvesical duct, three (11.5%); and cystic artery hocking the cystic duct, two (7.7%).

Conclusion: Biliary anatomical variations can be expected in any dissected zone. Most of the detected variants were associated with the cystic artery. An overlooked accessory cysto-biliary communication can cause complicated biliary leakage. A surgeon's skills and knowledge of laparoscopic anatomical variants are essential for performing a safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在资源匮乏的条件下进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术时遇到的罕见解剖变异和便捷的解剖安全区概念:一个单一中心的前瞻性观察研究。
目的:周围粘连的严重程度、异常解剖结构和技术问题是导致胆囊切除术复杂化的主要因素。本研究的重点是确定在资源有限的条件下进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术时发现的腹腔镜解剖变异的类型和频率,并确定解剖安全区:这项前瞻性研究于 2012 年至 2019 年在也门亚丁的一个中心进行。共有 375 名患者接受了标准四孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术,其中包括 355 名女性(94.7%)和 20 名男性(5.3%)。对区域性腹腔镜变异进行了评估和记录:结果:在 375 名患者中,26 人(6.9%)有腹腔镜解剖变异,其中 19 人(73.1%)有血管变异,7 人(26.9%)有导管变异。解剖变异包括:分离起源的双膀胱动脉,7 例(26.9%);莫尼汉驼峰,6 例(23.1%);单一起源的双膀胱动脉,4 例(15.4%);细长膀胱导管,4 例(15.4%);膀胱下导管,3 例(11.5%);膀胱动脉与膀胱导管对接,2 例(7.7%):结论:任何解剖区域都可能出现胆道解剖变异。结论:任何解剖区域都可能出现胆道解剖变异,大多数发现的变异都与膀胱动脉有关。被忽视的附属膀胱胆管沟通可导致复杂的胆漏。外科医生的技能和对腹腔镜解剖变异的了解是进行安全腹腔镜胆囊切除术的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Acute peritonitis caused by a ruptured urachal cyst accompanied by omphalitis in an adult: a case report and literature review. Analyzing the emergence of surgical robotics in Africa: a scoping review of pioneering procedures, platforms utilized, and outcome meta-analysis. Assessment of mechanical bowel preparation prior to nephrectomy in the minimally invasive surgery era: insights from a national database analysis in the United States. Automated machine learning with R: AutoML tools for beginners in clinical research. Is prophylactic abdominal drainage mandatory in laparoscopic hemicolectomy?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1