Functional roles of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in dinotefuran and flupyrimin toxicity and their sublethal effects on Sogatella furcifera (Hemiptera: Delphacidae).

Ling Wu, Yongqi Li, Wenbing Ding, Hualiang He, Hongshuai Gao, Qiao Gao, Youzhi Li, Lin Qiu
{"title":"Functional roles of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in dinotefuran and flupyrimin toxicity and their sublethal effects on Sogatella furcifera (Hemiptera: Delphacidae).","authors":"Ling Wu, Yongqi Li, Wenbing Ding, Hualiang He, Hongshuai Gao, Qiao Gao, Youzhi Li, Lin Qiu","doi":"10.1093/jee/toae211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sogatella furcifera (Horváth) (Hemiptera: Delphacidae), a serious rice pest, has developed significant resistance to a wide range of pesticides. Neonicotinoid insecticides are currently the primary choice for controlling S. furcifera, yet their impact on the species remains poorly understood. In this study, we investigated the binding sites of a conventional insecticide (dinotefuran) and a novel insecticide (flupyrimin), and evaluated their sublethal effects on S. furcifera. Our results revealed that the LC50 of dinotefuran and flupyrimin were 2.51 mg/L and 2.80 mg/L in third-instar S. furcifera, respectively. RNA interference (RNAi) knockdown of S. furcifera nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) alpha2 subunit (Sfα2) and S. furcifera nAChR beta1 subunit (Sfβ1) significantly reduced the susceptibility to dinotefuran by 18.7% and 16.8%, respectively, but had no effect on flupyrimin. Reproduction of the F0 and F1 generations was significantly inhibited by the LC25 of both dinotefuran and flupyrimin. In the dinotefuran treatment at LC25, the intrinsic growth rate (r) and finite growth rate (λ) were reduced to 0.15 and 0.16 days, respectively; the mean generation time (T) increased to 27.77 days, and the relative fitness was only 0.76 compared to the control. Additionally, the relative fitness (Rf) of the flupyrimin-treated group was reduced to 0.93 and 0.86 times that of the control group. The population dynamics of S. furcifera are significantly affected by both dinotefuran and flupyrimin, making these insecticides valuable tools for integrated pest management and the rational use of insecticides.</p>","PeriodicalId":94077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of economic entomology","volume":" ","pages":"2618-2627"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of economic entomology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toae211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sogatella furcifera (Horváth) (Hemiptera: Delphacidae), a serious rice pest, has developed significant resistance to a wide range of pesticides. Neonicotinoid insecticides are currently the primary choice for controlling S. furcifera, yet their impact on the species remains poorly understood. In this study, we investigated the binding sites of a conventional insecticide (dinotefuran) and a novel insecticide (flupyrimin), and evaluated their sublethal effects on S. furcifera. Our results revealed that the LC50 of dinotefuran and flupyrimin were 2.51 mg/L and 2.80 mg/L in third-instar S. furcifera, respectively. RNA interference (RNAi) knockdown of S. furcifera nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) alpha2 subunit (Sfα2) and S. furcifera nAChR beta1 subunit (Sfβ1) significantly reduced the susceptibility to dinotefuran by 18.7% and 16.8%, respectively, but had no effect on flupyrimin. Reproduction of the F0 and F1 generations was significantly inhibited by the LC25 of both dinotefuran and flupyrimin. In the dinotefuran treatment at LC25, the intrinsic growth rate (r) and finite growth rate (λ) were reduced to 0.15 and 0.16 days, respectively; the mean generation time (T) increased to 27.77 days, and the relative fitness was only 0.76 compared to the control. Additionally, the relative fitness (Rf) of the flupyrimin-treated group was reduced to 0.93 and 0.86 times that of the control group. The population dynamics of S. furcifera are significantly affected by both dinotefuran and flupyrimin, making these insecticides valuable tools for integrated pest management and the rational use of insecticides.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
烟碱乙酰胆碱受体在二硝基呋喃和氟嘧啶胺毒性中的功能作用及其对毛皮索加特拉(半翅目:Delphacidae)的亚致死效应。
Sogatella furcifera (Horváth) (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) 是一种严重的水稻害虫,已对多种杀虫剂产生了明显的抗药性。新烟碱类杀虫剂是目前防治毛稻蓟马的主要选择,但它们对毛稻蓟马的影响仍鲜为人知。在这项研究中,我们调查了一种传统杀虫剂(敌稗)和一种新型杀虫剂(氟啶虫酰胺)的结合位点,并评估了它们对毛皮蝉的亚致死效应。结果表明,敌敌畏和氟嘧啶对三龄糠虾的半致死浓度分别为2.51毫克/升和2.80毫克/升。RNAi干扰(RNAi)敲除糠虾烟碱乙酰胆碱受体(nAChR)α2亚基(Sfα2)和糠虾nAChRβ1亚基(Sfβ1)可显著降低糠虾对克星的敏感性,分别降低18.7%和16.8%,但对氟嘧啶胺无影响。第 0 代和第 1 代的繁殖受到第呋喃丹和氟嘧啶胺 LC25 的显著抑制。与对照组相比,在LC25浓度下的敌稗处理中,其内在生长率(r)和有限生长率(λ)分别降低到0.15天和0.16天;平均世代时间(T)增加到27.77天,相对适合度仅为0.76。此外,氟哌噻吨处理组的相对适合度(Rf)分别降至对照组的0.93倍和0.86倍。糠虾的种群动态受到敌敌畏和氟嘧啶胺的显著影响,因此这两种杀虫剂是害虫综合防治和合理使用杀虫剂的重要工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the biocontrol potential of Episyrphus balteatus (Diptera: Syrphidae) on wheat aphids in northern China. Laboratory and in-home evaluations of consumer- and professional-grade cockroach baits. On-farm evaluation of swede midge (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) susceptibility among popular kale varieties. Comparison of colored sticky traps for Stomoxys calcitrans (Diptera: Muscidae) on dairy cattle farms in Saraburi province, Thailand. Impact of climate change on the distribution of the citrus longhorned beetle Anoplophora chinensis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) and its host plants, Castanea mollissima and Castanea seguinii: a predictive analysis using optimized MaxEnt models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1